Bare Knuckle Pickups Forum

Forum Ringside => Pickups => Topic started by: gorath23 on January 28, 2008, 09:31:33 PM

Title: EMG 81 output v. Nailbomb
Post by: gorath23 on January 28, 2008, 09:31:33 PM

Just a quick question, which of the above has a higher output? i.e. what hits the preamp harder? I'm talking about the regular Alnico NB. Not really interested in the various tonal differences as I've already got that covered. Thanks!

Title: EMG 81 output v. Nailbomb
Post by: indysmith on January 28, 2008, 09:34:57 PM

the 81 - it's battery powered :P

Title: EMG 81 output v. Nailbomb
Post by: MDV on January 29, 2008, 12:30:59 AM

81, by quite a bit. Maybe, completely subjectively, 25 or 30 % more.

Title: EMG 81 output v. Nailbomb
Post by: Scott674 on January 29, 2008, 12:49:10 AM

How come, then, when I switch guitars between 81's  (Well, actually EMG 707's), and my passive strat, there doesn't seem to be a volume difference really...  Just curious.  Thanks!

Title: EMG 81 output v. Nailbomb
Post by: Hell Hound on January 29, 2008, 07:43:23 AM

If you are usuing distortion it wont change the volume, just the gain. TRy that on a good clean channel, you'll see :)

Title: EMG 81 output v. Nailbomb
Post by: ericsabbath on January 29, 2008, 08:03:55 AM

i know it sounds cliche, but if you want output, go ceramic

Title: EMG 81 output v. Nailbomb
Post by: gorath23 on January 29, 2008, 05:49:27 PM

Thanks everyone, the point is I actually want less gain but still retain a really aggressive rhythm tone  :wink: . The Nailbomb sounds like exactly like what I want but I wanted something with less output for better clarity and ease when recording.  I find I have to run the preamp gain too low on my Engl (when using the EMG) to stop everything mushing up but it also means that the amp isn't really in its singing range. Lower output p'ups should mean I can turn the gain up a bit and let the amp breathe.

Title: EMG 81 output v. Nailbomb
Post by: Hell Hound on January 29, 2008, 07:33:34 PM

No BKPs will mush up ever, even the Warpigs :)

Title: EMG 81 output v. Nailbomb
Post by: indysmith on January 29, 2008, 08:15:02 PM

Quote from: Hell Hound

No BKPs will mush up ever, even the Warpigs :)

Obviously never played em thru a mesa :roll:  :P

Title: EMG 81 output v. Nailbomb
Post by: Hell Hound on January 29, 2008, 08:37:52 PM

I got pwned haha, but give me any pickup that wont muddy up throught a recto :lol: (just trolling :P )

Title: EMG 81 output v. Nailbomb
Post by: ericsabbath on January 29, 2008, 09:23:29 PM

Quote from: Hell Hound

I got pwned haha, but give me any pickup that wont muddy up throught a recto :lol: (just trolling :P )

lol
truth
but the miracle man sounded a lot clearer through my ex-recto than the holy diver, so i'd recommend ceramics for it
greenbacks instead of vintage 30's help a lot too, especially if you use a fronloaded cab
the greenbacks seems to focus and clean up the muddy mids and the frontloaded design helps to tighten up the loose bass

Title: EMG 81 output v. Nailbomb
Post by: gorath23 on January 29, 2008, 10:57:46 PM

It never ceases to amaze me how popular the Recto's are when Mesa also produce the underrated Mark IV....

Title: EMG 81 output v. Nailbomb
Post by: MDV on January 30, 2008, 12:15:17 PM

Quote from: gorath23

Thanks everyone, the point is I actually want less gain but still retain a really aggressive rhythm tone  :wink: . The Nailbomb sounds like exactly like what I want but I wanted something with less output for better clarity and ease when recording.  I find I have to run the preamp gain too low on my Engl (when using the EMG) to stop everything mushing up but it also means that the amp isn't really in its singing range. Lower output p'ups should mean I can turn the gain up a bit and let the amp breathe.

Lower gain aggressive rhythm = mids.

This


is


THA


PAYNEKEEEEELAHHHHHH