Bare Knuckle Pickups Forum

Forum Ringside => Guitars, Amps and Effects => Topic started by: kellar on August 19, 2008, 06:00:19 PM

Title: Audacity or Reaper?
Post by: kellar on August 19, 2008, 06:00:19 PM: What software are you guys using to record? I currently use Audacity, but it seems laced with glitches and bugs. It has worked up to this point, but is getting rather annoying. I guess I can't complain too much seeing as how it is free. :lol:
I have read here that some are using Reaper. Is it better? Any other good programs out there? (assuming that I don't want to spend any money of course! :D)
Title: Re: Audacity or Reaper?
Post by: sgmypod on August 19, 2008, 06:20:30 PM: Cubase but have used reaper and audacity..reaper is better, updated regular..and bugs quickly iron out as remember can use vst plug ins and others and has quite nice free plugins as well (is the guy who coded winamp)
Title: Re: Audacity or Reaper?
Post by: kellar on August 19, 2008, 07:34:05 PM: Thanks man. I downloaded Reaper and dumped Audacity. Already seems to be a much better program. :D
Title: Re: Audacity or Reaper?
Post by: sgmypod on August 19, 2008, 07:52:37 PM: Yeah if could be bothered to re learn might have dumped cubase again for it
Title: Re: Audacity or Reaper?
Post by: Elliot on August 19, 2008, 10:56:12 PM: Reaper is great, good choice,

Try these free plugins http://www.kjaerhusaudio.com/classic-series.php
Title: Re: Audacity or Reaper?
Post by: _tom_ on August 20, 2008, 12:13:47 AM: Quote from: Elliot on August 19, 2008, 10:56:12 PM
Reaper is great, good choice,

Try these free plugins http://www.kjaerhusaudio.com/classic-series.php

+1 reaper is really good and easy to use. I use the kjaerhus classic compressor and it's great. I dont really know how to use it but it has a load of presets which seem to make things they're made for sound better so its all good :)
Title: Re: Audacity or Reaper?
Post by: Elliot on August 20, 2008, 07:53:15 AM: I agree - the Kjaerhus Master Limiter on the 'Master to CD' preset is great for that final mix down. I always also use the EQ 'more air' setting. The Kjaerhus presets are, unlike most presets, actually well thought out, useful and, better still, free.
Title: Re: Audacity or Reaper?
Post by: kellar on August 20, 2008, 03:31:58 PM: Thanks a lot guys! I am still trying to figuring the whole thing out. It seems rather difficult starting out, much different than the Audacity program that I have been using for the last year. But, it is a marked improvement over Audacity. :D
Title: Re: Audacity or Reaper?
Post by: _tom_ on August 20, 2008, 03:35:37 PM: If you need any help PM me, I can do basic things in it but if you need to do anything more advanced than recording, adding fx, vst instruments etc then I'm clueless :lol:
Title: Re: Audacity or Reaper?
Post by: Fikealox on August 21, 2008, 12:00:56 AM: Sorry for the newbish question, but I'm very much a stranger to computer recording... what is VST?
Title: Re: Audacity or Reaper?
Post by: _tom_ on August 21, 2008, 12:06:43 AM: I dont know what the initials stand for but I think they're just the effects plugins you use in DAWs such as Reaper, Cubase etc. VST instruments are synths which make the midi you program in actually make a sound, if that makes sense.
Title: Re: Audacity or Reaper?
Post by: Fikealox on August 21, 2008, 01:06:35 AM: That makes heaps of sense, Tom, thanks :)
Title: Re: Audacity or Reaper?
Post by: sgmypod on August 21, 2008, 09:33:13 AM: Virtual Standard Audio....they are anything from compressors, reverbs, instruments...it is a Steinberg thing....but reaper can use them, one of the reasons it's a good prog...because there are so many free ones for reaper itself..and then you can use the thousands that were designed for cubase