Bare Knuckle Pickups Forum

Forum Ringside => Guitars, Amps and Effects => Topic started by: Stevepage on March 31, 2010, 10:33:47 AM

Title: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: Stevepage on March 31, 2010, 10:33:47 AM
If any one on here has one, please post pics.

I saw one in a shop yesterday along with a SG2000. Both were gorgeous and I loved the huge necks on them

I've even been thinking about trading my Carvin for a SG1000  :o
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: Philly Q on March 31, 2010, 10:39:32 AM
They have huge necks?  I was under the impression they were on the slimmish side. 

Now I'm even more frustrated that they're (reputedly) so heavy.  :(
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: d1dsj on March 31, 2010, 10:49:02 AM
They have huge necks?  I was under the impression they were on the slimmish side. 

Now I'm even more frustrated that they're (reputedly) so heavy.  :(

I have a 3000 and have played several 1000's and 2000's over the years and agree with Philly that the necks are relatively slim. Regarding the weight issue, they are heavy although I've played loads of LP.C's that were much heavier, the problem is that they don't carry that weight very well because of the strap button positions. I have moved the button from behind the neck on mine to half way around the top cut away and it's 10 x's more comfortable, doesn't feel as heavy and balances better. Although I favour my LP's the Yamaha is a much better built and finished guitar, but you have to have the balls to drill a hole to make it feel better!
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: Stevepage on March 31, 2010, 11:04:12 AM
The SG1000 I saw was a brand new one, so the necks may be different from older models? not entirely sure, but it was fatter than my Carvin's neck which is slightly fatter and more rounded to a USA Jackson neck.
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: Philly Q on March 31, 2010, 11:12:43 AM
Maybe it's a relative thing!  Jacksons are dead skinny, so you could go a couple of "sizes" bigger and still feel small compared with a Gibson neck.  :)

But perhaps they are using a bigger neck on the new models, that would be cool.
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: Stevepage on March 31, 2010, 11:15:26 AM
To compare to a Gibson's 59 profile neck, it's slimmer, but only a touch.

Should of used that comparison to begin with really  :lol:
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: Ratrod on March 31, 2010, 11:45:44 AM
I have a 400.

The fretboard is a bit less wide than a Gibson. Made for small oriental hands, I reckon. And yes they're heavy.

But they are rediculously good.
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: LazyNinja on March 31, 2010, 12:34:55 PM
They have huge necks?  I was under the impression they were on the slimmish side. 

Now I'm even more frustrated that they're (reputedly) so heavy.  :(

The SG1000 I had had a slim neck, but I have played a SG2000 that had a massive baseball bat neck. It varies I think.
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: MrBump on March 31, 2010, 01:04:24 PM
SG200 for me, the poor relation.  But what a guitar!  Slim-ish neck, feels quite wide.

Mark.
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: Catalyst77 on March 31, 2010, 04:50:27 PM
I have a SG500, just compared it to my les pauls and superstrats, it definately has the widest fatest neck of all my guitars.

I remember it turning up from Japan and thinking how uncomfortable it was; but then all of a sudden it seemed to feel great.

Maybe they're actually all the same and our hands are different sizes :lol:

they've been making these for ages so i'm sure there's loads of variations out there
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: WezV on March 31, 2010, 05:05:41 PM
last one i measured was an old SG2000, 20mm thick at the nut, 23mm at the 12th fret and a squarish D profile.   very comfortable, and is what i copied for my recent LP/PRS hybrid
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: MrBump on March 31, 2010, 05:12:34 PM
When I grow up I'm going to get one of the posher Yam SGs.

Or maybe have one built...  I can't think of any other guitar that I'd want to have custom built.

Apart from a really nice Tele maybe...
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: DavidRees on March 31, 2010, 06:36:53 PM
my modified SG500 with 15 -56 strings [for slide] and BK Manhattans :D
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: gordiji on March 31, 2010, 08:57:22 PM
I had a 1000 in the 80's and it was thin neck but very well made. I've never heard of the headstock fall of one.Recently i was thinking of getting a second hand one again, they can be had for 500- 750 so a bit of haggling,
a trip to the luthier, and new pup's perhaps for 1k(my limit).
While looking a few people reckoned the woods and' rapid construction ' methods mean they're not the same quality as the originals but i've never come accross a duff yamaha product. period .
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: Ratrod on April 01, 2010, 11:40:31 AM
I've never heard of the headstock fall of one.

That's because they put a little duck tail where the neck goes to the headstock. Very clever. Also the neck is set into the body like the mast of a ship. It's supported on all four sides. You'll probably pop off the top before the neck is seperated from the body.

Built like a tank.
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: MrBump on April 01, 2010, 11:43:11 AM
my modified SG500 with 15 -56 strings [for slide] and BK Manhattans :D

That looks VERY tasty, David...
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: Philly Q on April 01, 2010, 11:52:40 AM
I've never heard of the headstock fall of one.

That's because they put a little duck tail where the neck goes to the headstock. Very clever.

Is it also a multi-piece neck?  Less likely to break than one-piece mahogany.
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: LazyNinja on April 01, 2010, 12:17:17 PM
I've never heard of the headstock fall of one.

That's because they put a little duck tail where the neck goes to the headstock. Very clever.

Is it also a multi-piece neck?  Less likely to break than one-piece mahogany.

My 1000 had a three piece neck.
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: LazyNinja on April 01, 2010, 12:20:55 PM
While looking a few people reckoned the woods and' rapid construction ' methods mean they're not the same quality as the originals but i've never come accross a duff yamaha product. period .

Saying that, Yamaha do this process where they vibrate the guitars to get the guitars to have a "played in" feeling. Supposed to work great.
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: mikeluke on April 01, 2010, 02:55:02 PM
I shipped one at the end of last year that ParcelFarce managed to snap.... (SG2000)

Have an SG3000 on Evil Bay at present and will have a 'players' SG2000 up there shortly - if anyone is interested
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: Stevepage on April 01, 2010, 03:05:38 PM
I shipped one at the end of last year that ParcelFarce managed to snap.... (SG2000)

Have an SG3000 on Evil Bay at present and will have a 'players' SG2000 up there shortly - if anyone is interested

check your pms
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: GuiTony on April 01, 2010, 09:11:52 PM
I'm going to pick one up tomorrow - an early 80s SG1000.

 :D

Only taken me about 30 years to finally spend the ££s to get one!
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: MrBump on April 02, 2010, 11:20:50 AM
I'm going to pick one up tomorrow - an early 80s SG1000.

 :D

Only taken me about 30 years to finally spend the ££s to get one!

Well done!
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: d1dsj on April 02, 2010, 12:40:08 PM
Nice one, because of this thread thread I've been playing mine.... and now that strap button is in the right place (for me at least) it's a belter. Even the stock pick ups are awesome, I really hope you enjoy it fella!
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: GuiTony on April 02, 2010, 01:59:08 PM
Just collected it.

1982 vintage and all original. 

It's got a few knocks and scratches but nothing major.  Pots are a little scratchy, but that's easily fixed.  The truss rod needs a tweak or two to straighten the neck and sort out the action but - again - no biggie.

Just plugged it in (Epi Valve Jr, so no fancy fx or eq) and the sound of it  :o ... what an incredible range of tones, everything from almost-acoustic, through jazzy blues, out to classic rock.

These things fully deserve the reputation ...
Title: Re: Yamaha SG1000's
Post by: Ratrod on April 03, 2010, 12:28:50 PM
I've never heard of the headstock fall of one.

That's because they put a little duck tail where the neck goes to the headstock. Very clever.

Is it also a multi-piece neck?  Less likely to break than one-piece mahogany.

Mine has a one piece neck. The 400 is not as fancy as the higher numbers. The top of the range models are neck through.