Bare Knuckle Pickups Forum

Forum Ringside => Guitars, Amps and Effects => Topic started by: MrBump on January 16, 2011, 10:24:34 AM

Title: I Agree With Roo!
Post by: MrBump on January 16, 2011, 10:24:34 AM: http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/FENDER-TELECASTER-CUSTOM-SHOP-12-STRING-SEA-FOAM-/390279146967?pt=UK_Musical_Instruments_Guitars_CV&hash=item5ade732dd7 (http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/FENDER-TELECASTER-CUSTOM-SHOP-12-STRING-SEA-FOAM-/390279146967?pt=UK_Musical_Instruments_Guitars_CV&hash=item5ade732dd7)

Check out the headstock on this monstrosity!!!

:lol:
Title: Re: I Agree With Roo!
Post by: kevinr on January 16, 2011, 10:28:18 AM: You could always play cricket with it!
Title: Re: I Agree With Roo!
Post by: Philly Q on January 16, 2011, 10:54:58 AM: It's not a pretty guitar.

But the title of this thread is really unfortunate. It's just feeding his obsession. It's like giving him licence to ramble on about bulbous bits, wasting tone wood, anyone who's ever played a Tele looking like a complete knob jockey, etc.....

(ad nauseam)
Title: Re: I Agree With Roo!
Post by: Elliot on January 16, 2011, 11:53:26 AM: 12 strings need a lot of headstock.

Personally, I like it.
Title: Re: I Agree With Roo!
Post by: gwEm on January 16, 2011, 12:03:51 PM: Quote from: Elliot on January 16, 2011, 11:53:26 AM
12 strings need a lot of headstock.

Personally, I like it.

i like the idea of the guitar, and would be happy to own it.. but i do agree with the others that its not pretty - though what better option for headstock would there be in this case?
Title: Re: I Agree With Roo!
Post by: shobet on January 16, 2011, 12:13:07 PM: I like it as well, I prefer that headstock to the hockey stick one they put on the Fender Electric XII.
Title: Re: I Agree With Roo!
Post by: FernandoDuarte on January 16, 2011, 04:47:38 PM: Will Roo start making excuses to keep going on this thread after he seems the Tele, as the other thread? :P
Title: Re: I Agree With Roo!
Post by: Telerocker on January 16, 2011, 05:55:55 PM: A twelve string needs a big headstock. It will be less elegant then a sixstring tele. But it's not too bad.
Title: Re: I Agree With Roo!
Post by: Roobubba on January 17, 2011, 06:33:22 PM: Quote from: Philly Q on January 16, 2011, 10:54:58 AM
It's not a pretty guitar.

But the title of this thread is really unfortunate. It's just feeding his obsession. It's like giving him licence to ramble on about bulbous bits, wasting tone wood, anyone who's ever played a Tele looking like a complete knob jockey, etc.....

(ad nauseam)

Looks like Philly is finally seeing the truth I speak! :) My work here is done :)

(ps I haven't clicked the link).

:)
Title: Re: I Agree With Roo!
Post by: Philly Q on January 17, 2011, 06:54:34 PM: Quote from: Roobubba on January 17, 2011, 06:33:22 PM
Looks like Philly is finally seeing the truth I speak! :) My work here is done :)

:lol: Not at all. But I've pretty much given up arguing.
Title: Re: I Agree With Roo!
Post by: Ian Price on January 17, 2011, 07:05:29 PM: Quote from: Roobubba on January 17, 2011, 06:33:22 PM
My work here is done :)

Does that mean you won't be posting on this forum again? :wink:
Title: Re: I Agree With Roo!
Post by: Antag on January 17, 2011, 07:54:37 PM: As Arnold Schwarzenegger once said: "You are one urgly muddfugga" (the guitar, that is :))
Title: Re: I Agree With Roo!
Post by: nfe on January 17, 2011, 08:08:32 PM: I like that headstock. It's completely in line with tele aesthetics, no frills, simplest thing that gets the job done vibe.