Bare Knuckle Pickups Forum

At The Back => Time Out => Topic started by: Afghan Dave on January 20, 2011, 07:55:14 PM

Title: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: Afghan Dave on January 20, 2011, 07:55:14 PM
http://www.bestofnamm.com/products/view/les-paul-retro-fit-floyd-rose

Here is one hot off the presses, Floyd Rose has added a version of his double locking tremolo that is made to easily fit on a Les Paul. No drilling required.


(http://www.bestofnamm.com/img/gallery_images/184_480_wide.jpg)
Title: Re: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: Jonny on January 20, 2011, 09:02:27 PM
So it sits on the studs? :o

C'est magnifique!
Title: Re: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: blue on January 21, 2011, 12:19:44 AM
Foyd Rose did a bridge like this some years ago, although it looked a bit different.  i actually have one sitting somewhere!  i'll see if i can find it.  i agree, it's a good idea, which is why i bought mine.  really must actaully install it sometime...
Title: Re: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: Philly Q on January 21, 2011, 12:39:48 AM
Foyd Rose did a bridge like this some years ago, although it looked a bit different.  i actually have one sitting somewhere!  i'll see if i can find it.  i agree, it's a good idea, which is why i bought mine.  really must actaully install it sometime...

That rings a bell.  If I'm remembering right, does it have a row of about 10 really skinny little springs on the back?
Title: Re: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: JacksonRR on January 21, 2011, 03:22:43 AM
Yeah I've seen that one too somewhere. It did have a bunch of little springs. 10 springs, good memory sir! Here ya go:
(http://www.vintagekramer.com/parts/floydpaul1.jpg)
Title: Re: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: PhilKing on January 21, 2011, 01:59:11 PM
http://www.bestofnamm.com/products/view/les-paul-retro-fit-floyd-rose
Here is one hot off the presses, Floyd Rose has added a version of his double locking tremolo that is made to easily fit on a Les Paul. No drilling required. (http://www.bestofnamm.com/img/gallery_images/184_480_wide.jpg)
You still need to drill the headstock to clamp the strings.  It's not a 'no changes to the guitar' fix.
Title: Re: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: psy on January 21, 2011, 02:29:43 PM
Would teaming it up with locking tuners cure that problem?
Title: Re: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: James C on January 21, 2011, 02:48:07 PM
Would teaming it up with locking tuners cure that problem?

I think it would, would at least make it as stable as a PRS trem.

Really want one of these, and a les paul to put it on!
Title: Re: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: mikeluke on January 21, 2011, 04:02:07 PM
Sorry - just does not do it for me - LPs + any sort of trem = 'Yuk'!

Title: Re: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: blue on January 21, 2011, 04:10:40 PM
Philly and JacksonRR, that is the very one :)
Title: Re: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: Philly Q on January 21, 2011, 06:04:19 PM
Sorry - just does not do it for me - LPs + any sort of trem = 'Yuk'!

I'm not into LPs (except Juniors) or trems, especially Floyds.... but for some reason the Les Paul Axcess quite appeals to me.  I'm not saying I want to actually buy one or anything, but it's a rare case where Gibson have done something a bit different and not ruined it by adding Mickey Mouse inlays or a built-in digital tuner with multi-coloured LEDs....

(http://www.gibson.com/Files/AllAccess/2008/Feature_Images2/axcess.jpg)
Title: Re: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: FELINEGUITARS on January 21, 2011, 08:32:47 PM
Sorry - just does not do it for me - LPs + any sort of trem = 'Yuk'!

I'm not into LPs (except Juniors) or trems, especially Floyds.... but for some reason the Les Paul Axcess quite appeals to me.  I'm not saying I want to actually buy one or anything, but it's a rare case where Gibson have done something a bit different and not ruined it by adding Mickey Mouse inlays or a built-in digital tuner with multi-coloured LEDs....

(http://www.gibson.com/Files/AllAccess/2008/Feature_Images2/axcess.jpg)

And a neck joint with better access to the high frets
Title: Re: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: Philly Q on January 21, 2011, 10:31:11 PM
And a neck joint with better access to the high frets

And a thinner body, and a belly cut.... I think the neck is fairly thin, unfortunately, but that's personal preference.  They didn't actually get anything wrong for once.
Title: Re: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: WezV on January 21, 2011, 10:52:36 PM
its one of their ofset carves on the neck i think.  its a hell of a lot of features they should put in a standard LP without a floyd.

Title: Re: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: blue on January 22, 2011, 01:53:19 AM
they do the Axcess with a tunomatic as well.  the floyd rose version really appeals to me, the custom shop price doesn't!  like Wez says, it's what the Les Paul standard should be now.  call it the "Les Paul Modern" alongside the historically correct "traditional" model.

of course, they are all features available on a certain guitar named after a big African cat
Title: Re: NEW Les Paul Retro-Fit Floyd Rose!
Post by: HTH AMPS on January 26, 2011, 12:50:13 PM
for a dyed-in-the-wool Les Paul player like myself, I find it difficult to switch to anything other than a Les Paul when gigging, so a floyd on a LP is great for me. 

unfortunately, getting a decent LP with a floyd is expensive, hence my RAWK guitar is a BC Rich, which is a crackin guitar to play following a setup from Paul Richardson.