Bare Knuckle Pickups Forum

Forum Ringside => Guitars, Amps and Effects => Topic started by: Andrew W on May 01, 2011, 09:21:19 AM

Title: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: Andrew W on May 01, 2011, 09:21:19 AM: I think Gibson have done 7 string Vs before but this new one is quite interesting

(http://images.gibson.com.s3.amazonaws.com/Products/Electric-Guitars/Designer/Gibson-USA/Flying-V-7-String/Gallery-Images/DSV7EBGH1-Finish-Shot.jpg)

I like the black and gold and I think they've solved how to handle the tuners as elegantly as is possible. That said I still don't really want one but it's a sign of Gibson doing something a bit different without putting the entire design department on crystal meth (see Firebird X).

Clicky (http://www2.gibson.com/Products/Electric-Guitars/Flying-V/Gibson-USA/Flying-V-7-String.aspx).
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: WezV on May 01, 2011, 09:24:57 AM: change to black hardware and they might actually have something there
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: asianaxeman on May 01, 2011, 10:56:21 AM: it's bad ass. Should have had some fret markings tho and perhaps ebony board to look even more stealthy.
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: Stevepage on May 01, 2011, 11:41:03 AM: That's going to be a bitch to intonate. 24.75 inch scale length + TOM bridge + Big low B string = pain in the buttocks.

It does look cool but going from experience keeping that low string intonated is just so much hassle.
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: Philly Q on May 01, 2011, 12:16:18 PM: It's.... OK. The centre tuner looks "wrong" but it does sort of make sense.

I like the gold hardware, but it needs conventional pickups (how about some BKPs with gold covers?)

And please Gibson, if you're going to keep making black limited edition guitars, put ebony boards on them!!
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: Madsakre on May 01, 2011, 02:20:44 PM: Quote from: Stevepage on May 01, 2011, 11:41:03 AM
That's going to be a bitch to intonate. 24.75 inch scale length + TOM bridge + Big low B string = pain in the buttocks.

It does look cool but going from experience keeping that low string intonated is just so much hassle.

The bridge is angled :) but it will be a bitch to intonate below B
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: JacksonRR on May 01, 2011, 04:30:10 PM: 24.75 scale on a 7 stringer? Why? To keep in line with what they've always done? It doesn't make any sense. I think politicians work at Gibson. It's appears to be what you want, but doesn't function as it should.
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: Transcend on May 01, 2011, 04:46:52 PM: I think 7 strings should have at least a 26.5" scale minimum preferably 27"

all the 25.5" ones i've played have never been optimal imho

never played a 24.75" one but i imagine it would be a mess
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: FernandoDuarte on May 01, 2011, 10:50:12 PM: Quote from: JacksonRR on May 01, 2011, 04:30:10 PM
24.75 scale on a 7 stringer? Why? To keep in line with what they've always done? It doesn't make any sense. I think politicians work at Gibson. It's appears to be what you want, but doesn't function as it should.

The tone ZW have on the "BBBB" DVD on the "B tuned" songs are one of the best tones in low tunning I've heard... May be personal preference, tought... I really dislike MOST of 25.5" scale on metal

BTW, beside the tunning pegs, I like this V a lot!
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: Transcend on May 01, 2011, 10:51:34 PM: I do like the look of this V also.

if they got rid of the gold it would be 100% win visually for me
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: Keven on May 01, 2011, 11:02:33 PM: looks very cool! but alas in typical gibson fashion they managed to mess something up: the scale length
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: Alex on May 02, 2011, 12:51:44 AM: Quote from: Toe-Knee on May 01, 2011, 04:46:52 PM
I think 7 strings should have at least a 26.5" scale minimum preferably 27"

all the 25.5" ones i've played have never been optimal imho

never played a 24.75" one but i imagine it would be a mess

I couldn't agree more! I used to have an Ibanez RG for B standard tuning, but when I got my baritone (27") it just opened my eyes on what wonders a longer scale does.
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: Oli on May 02, 2011, 09:37:10 AM: Doesn't look right with EMGs in there, but with some normal covered pickups, it'd look great!
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: Zaned on May 03, 2011, 06:20:51 AM: Quote from: Toe-Knee on May 01, 2011, 04:46:52 PM
I think 7 strings should have at least a 26.5" scale minimum preferably 27"

all the 25.5" ones i've played have never been optimal imho

never played a 24.75" one but i imagine it would be a mess

Seems to work for Zakk Wylde though. Good quality woods and well made neck affect the attack and playability of course. Wylde's guitars have a maple+ebony neck though, so it's got a lot tighter and crisper attack than a mahogany+rosewood.

-Zaned
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: asianaxeman on May 03, 2011, 05:10:46 PM: string guage 11-70 for zakk or therabouts!
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: nfe on May 03, 2011, 05:14:53 PM: Real men have 14-70 on the Les Pauls 8)
Title: Re: Gibson 7 String Flying V
Post by: Nadz1lla on May 08, 2011, 12:33:37 AM: I think it looks absolutely gorgeous, but as has been previously mentioned, it is pure folly to have a 24.45 scale 7 string. That low B is going to be way too flabby to sound even halfway decent. I have no idea what monkey they have thinking these things up, but they need to learn a thing or two about string tensions. Shame, Gibson used to be good, and I dare say they used to know how to build guitars.