Bare Knuckle Pickups Forum
Forum Ringside => Pickups => Topic started by: Twinfan on January 15, 2006, 08:51:15 PM
-
OK, so if I order a set of Mules for my LP Standard, do I go for covers or not?
Apart from the looks, are there any other pros/cons for covers vs no covers???
Dave
-
I think tim adjusts the winding to minimise the difference in tone, but i think i saw him say in another thread that uncovered pickups are still a little treblier.
-
Covers will soften the treble slightly. I think the Mules sound better with covers personally.
-
If you're not sure, you could always get em without covers, then if you want to later on, you can send em back to be covered and potted I think.
-
Sounds like I'd prefer them with covers - I don't like too much treble.
Cheers!
-
^it'll depend on the pickup, too, remember...
-
Good point.
Has anyone tried uncovered Mules? Are they wound differently to compensate?
-
Tim's explorer has uncovered Mules.
-
Generally (IMO) uncovered pick-ups have a bit more open tone.
It's like they respond slightly more compared to covered pick-ups.
I've tested both Fralins and TomHolmes with covers, and then taken the covers off.
Anyway, I use several covered pick-ups and they sound great (of course).
I guess Tim has done something to add up for the loss of treble in covered pups. My HoldyDivers are with aged covers, and sounds awesome.
I would not change a bit on these.
T.
-
HOLY DIVERS (not Holdy D..., spelling errrrr...) :)