Username: Password:

Author Topic: Opinions on 3-channel tube heads  (Read 9752 times)

dave_mc

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 9796
Opinions on 3-channel tube heads
« Reply #30 on: March 03, 2008, 08:37:35 PM »
Quote from: Slarty
Try a Bruentti if you can find one.  

I have the XL R Evo II which has three channels.  The clean is awesome and chimey but never harsh, even at maximum gain it just doesn't want to break up too much.  The other two channels (boost and lead) are awesome too.  Its a just an all round awesome amp, not over complicated like some deizel and bogner amps.

Try one and you'll like it :)


that's a very nice amp. if i hadn't got such a good deal on my engl, i'd probably have gone with that.

Dennis

  • Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 64
Opinions on 3-channel tube heads
« Reply #31 on: March 03, 2008, 09:06:30 PM »
Quote from: Slarty
Try a Bruentti if you can find one.  


I have tried several Brunetti's, and they are nice amps, but not for what I want to do with it for some reason :)

Quote from: HeavyAxes

Maybe the Cameron CCM-100 is another option: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QYNk30aycM&feature=related


Yeah! That baby seems to have a nice chugga-chugga rhythm tone, very curious about that one!

Quote from: horsehead
What about the Hughes & Kettner Tri-amp? From my little knowledge of playing one it sounds lovely


Yeah, it does :) I own a Triamp mkII, but it is kinda smooth you know...I want some more grit in the lead sound, and a smoother clean...I wish I could play as good as I want my sound to be  :lol:

Everyone thanks for the replys so far. I am still not "finished" testing finding my holy grail, but slowly I am thinking of going to get me a custom built amp, just for me. Actually, when you compare it to a Mesa Roadking, it isn't expensive actually  :lol:
Nailbombs, Irish Tours, C-Warpig7, Cold Sweat7, Apaches