Username: Password:

Author Topic: JET FRETZ  (Read 4075 times)

jibidy

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 595
Re: JET FRETZ
« Reply #15 on: February 06, 2009, 02:40:17 PM »
Load of cr@p.

Why would you just get one of those Exciters. Is it aphex that do them?

Save having huge ugly frets.

FELINEGUITARS

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6609
  • London & Southeast's Number 1 BKP stockist
    • http://www.felineguitars.com
Re: JET FRETZ
« Reply #16 on: February 06, 2009, 04:07:58 PM »
I dont think the guy marketing them is doing a very good job
There is something to be said for the frets and I am interested to check out the potential positives

Demoing them with such a shedload of gain and FX fails to get across what is going on - maybe the guy is even more stuck in a 1980s big hair timewarp than me (if such a thing were possible)

The old bar fretwire that Martin used  in the old days certainly had people saying it was good for tone , and the Chapman stick has huge wire buried into the fingerboard and seems to have a unique sustain that allows notes to be just tapped out

So I wont write it off even though I am sure it wont catch on in a big way

I am concerned about the serviceability of the neck from a tech's point of view as well, but more keen to see what positives it offers
www.felineguitars.com - repairs & custom built
Great fretwork!
Buy your BKPs & Earvana from ME!

MrBump

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3405
  • Essex! Home of the Brave!!!
    • This Is Essex
Re: JET FRETZ
« Reply #17 on: February 06, 2009, 05:57:14 PM »
... interesting stuff.

My brother in law has a theory that the neck of a guitar has far more to do with the tonal properties than the body...

I'll bet people will have an opinion on THAT one!
BKPs Past and Present - Nailbombs, Mules, Blackguard Flat 50's, VHII's & Trilogy Suite with Neck & Bridge Baseplates!

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: JET FRETZ
« Reply #18 on: February 06, 2009, 08:55:51 PM »
Demoing them with such a shedload of gain and FX fails to get across what is going on - maybe the guy is even more stuck in a 1980s big hair timewarp than me (if such a thing were possible)

At least you've got the big hair!  :lol:

He does come across as a complete tool.  It may be a good product, but his marketing approach is going to alienate a lot of people straight away.

« Last Edit: February 06, 2009, 08:57:45 PM by Philly Q »
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

Ratrod

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5264
Re: JET FRETZ
« Reply #19 on: February 07, 2009, 11:21:28 AM »
or swap your TOM for a bar bridge.

This one??


Direct retrofit to TOM??

Yes but not quite. I know a guy who makes bar bridges that follow the radius of your fretboard. Also as a direct replacement for TOM's,  including a slimmer one for LP's and SG's. You can also choose between brass, stainless and aluminium. Custom string spacing is also available.

here's a link: http://gretschpages.com/forum/other-equipment/introducing-tru-arc-bridges/12746/page1/


BKP user since 2004: early 7K Blackguard 50

FernandoDuarte

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3978
Re: JET FRETZ
« Reply #20 on: February 07, 2009, 12:20:15 PM »
Very interesting.... How does it sounds, tune-wise?

Ratrod

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5264
Re: JET FRETZ
« Reply #21 on: February 08, 2009, 12:07:24 PM »
Intonation will never be as perfect as a TOM. With a floating bridge you can get good enough intonation. With a fixed bridge you'll probably need 11's to get close to perfect intonation.

It's a compromise between tone/sustain and intonation. Players from the old days didn't have much problems with non-adjustable bridges. Same goes for acoustic players.
BKP user since 2004: early 7K Blackguard 50

FernandoDuarte

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3978
Re: JET FRETZ
« Reply #22 on: February 08, 2009, 04:10:42 PM »
No problem, I'm already on 11's :D Thinking slowly in going to 12's