Username: Password:

Author Topic: Non-Shiney Guitars  (Read 3757 times)

Pauldem

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 137
Re: Non-Shiney Guitars
« Reply #15 on: February 11, 2009, 11:09:15 PM »
I was under the impression that they were, due to them having being bolt-on necks. That said I know very little about PRS and they seem to change there midrange guitar specs quite a bit. I know that the Hiland model does for sure and of course the satin types. Mine is a little odd as it has a one peice maple cap, but I've no idea why? :)

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: Non-Shiney Guitars
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2009, 07:35:54 AM »
Mine is a little odd as it has a one peice maple cap, but I've no idea why? :)

One of my McCartys does too.  It's unusual to have a one-piece top but it happens from time to time  :)

Pauldem

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 137
Re: Non-Shiney Guitars
« Reply #17 on: February 12, 2009, 12:36:16 PM »
Well after the possibility of the damage to the blue Mateo number I opted for this one. After Nolly's visit I think I'll go with some Cold Sweats in this one.


PPPMAT

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 272
Re: Non-Shiney Guitars
« Reply #18 on: February 12, 2009, 12:58:08 PM »
Wow what a great top  8)

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: Non-Shiney Guitars
« Reply #19 on: February 12, 2009, 07:28:58 PM »
Great choice!  Lovely!

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: Non-Shiney Guitars
« Reply #20 on: February 12, 2009, 09:14:00 PM »
That does look good!
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

Groove Cartel

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 42
    • Groove Cartel
Re: Non-Shiney Guitars
« Reply #21 on: February 12, 2009, 09:27:55 PM »
Oil and wax is the way forward. Its easily maintained and a complete refinish can be done if required. Why would you encapsulate something resonant in a coat of lacquer??

My guitar has been through four months of gigs and rehearsals and still looks mint, despite several very sweaty gigs. Plus any surface dings can be steamed out.

Its the way forward, check out my guitar on www.vanquishsounds.com

It's the Custom.


Pauldem

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 137
Re: Non-Shiney Guitars
« Reply #22 on: February 13, 2009, 08:31:01 AM »
Great choice!  Lovely!

Many thanks :D. Well I've seen a fair few of these and they really do seem to vary in terms of burst and the maple caps themselves. I found this one very reasonably priced and asked them to send me some pics as they also had the honeyburst. This one was so purty that I couldn't resist. Should go well with my other LP

Bob Johnson

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 445
    • http://www.legraguitars.co.uk
Re: Non-Shiney Guitars
« Reply #23 on: February 13, 2009, 08:46:27 AM »
I understand that without the laquer, that these guitars may damage a little easier. Other than that how have people found them or anything else satin/faded for that matter? I've tried the Gibson and found that it was a pleasure, but I have a PRS CE24 with a satin neck that I use all the time, so am tempted in that direction also.

Any help would be gratefully received.

Ta Paul

Actually thick polyester finishes chip much more easily than light satin / matt ones do.
Regards,
Bob Johnson
Legra Guitars

Nolly

  • Global Moderator
  • Welterweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 1837
Re: Non-Shiney Guitars
« Reply #24 on: February 13, 2009, 08:49:16 AM »
Well after the possibility of the damage to the blue Mateo number I opted for this one. After Nolly's visit I think I'll go with some Cold Sweats in this one.



Damn, missed that one when I was there! We should have extended the gear tour!