Username: Password:

Author Topic: Damage control demonizer  (Read 3544 times)

MDV

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
  • If it sounds good it IS good
Damage control demonizer
« on: March 04, 2009, 02:34:29 PM »
Whats the crack with this thing?

The reviews are mostly honeymoon, and the blurb is the usual impenatrable uninformative shower of shite and buzzwords.

Real experiences? Good and bad!

Would be for DI recording. Reamping is King (!!!! do it! Do it NOW!), but its always nice to have more sounds. Would sit alongside a POD XT (stock), Tonelab LE, award session JD10 and seymour duncan twin tube mayhem, so comparisons with any of those would be helpfull.

exoslime

  • Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 59
Re: Damage control demonizer
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2009, 04:13:37 PM »
cheers,

i have a demonizer (and a womanizer too) since quite a while now, i purchased both after they came out..
and still, i´m quite happy with them... the direct out sounds fine, but need and extra eq afterwards (in my opionion).. and i have also a g-sharp as parallel effect to give it more room, sounds nicier when played with headphones or studio monitors.

what i like is the the direct playing response of both, i owned a pod shortly but returned within the first weeks because i didnt like the feeling for playing.
and compared to guitar sims like Guitar Rig, Revalver and Amplitube, you have much more sound possibillities in them, but the feeling when playing is complettly different, the demonizer feels much much better.

also you have a direct out, which you can use for impulses, there you can really create completly different types of sounds, the recabinet impulses for example works good with that, but you need alot of tweaking to do so, i experienced that all impulses sounds completly different then the direct recording out of the demonizer.

Its a shame that the demonizer cannot store settings :(

now, i bought a mesa boogie roadking II a few weeks ago, and compared to that, the demonizer sucks totally, you also cannot compare apples to oranges, but, i still use my demonizer, because with my roadking, i cannot play with headphones yet (waiting still for my weber mass), or playing at silent volume.
and for demo recording, the demonizer still cover my needs, no micing, no mics could ev. moved, etc. and the sound is always the same (you need to give em a few minutes to get warmed, because within the first minutes, the tone changes a bit)
I already recorded direct inputs of my guitar takes too so that then i can reamp through my roadking.. but before i could do that, i need a reamp box + ev. a new soundcard, since my compact mixer only got a stereo out..

ah yes, i owned a blackstar ht dual pedal too, and this was really a sucker compared to the damage controls... i returned that one shortly too :)

and again, an extra eq after the recording out is very important in my opinion.

exoslime


MDV

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
  • If it sounds good it IS good
Re: Damage control demonizer
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2009, 07:41:54 PM »
Thanks for the complete and frank reply.

Its on the backburner, I think. I have other stuff to buy first.

Johnny Mac

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5841
    • Ultimate Guitar Profile
Re: Damage control demonizer
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2009, 08:15:30 PM »
Mark!

So how's he Re-Amper? Is it good?
Warpig, MQ,
Miracle Man-Trilogy Suite, Cold Sweats, Black Guards, Rebel Yells & Irish Tours!

MDV

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
  • If it sounds good it IS good
Re: Damage control demonizer
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2009, 09:02:29 PM »
The reamper is great. Reamping in general is gods gift to recording.

It is a bit weird hearing your playing through an amp, indistiguishable from normal, without a guitar in your hands though.

But it really takes a lot of headache out of recording. You get a tone you can *tollerate* to record with (which is all I ever really did for finished stuff with the modeller clips I posted) and you focus on getting good takes, then you find a sound. Shear genius.

Oli

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 915
Re: Damage control demonizer
« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2009, 09:07:29 PM »
The reamper is great. Reamping in general is gods gift to recording.

It is a bit weird hearing your playing through an amp, indistiguishable from normal, without a guitar in your hands though.

But it really takes a lot of headache out of recording. You get a tone you can *tollerate* to record with (which is all I ever really did for finished stuff with the modeller clips I posted) and you focus on getting good takes, then you find a sound. Shear genius.

And it makes editing so much easier! Having some transients that you can see and work with is a godsend- much nicer than having a square wave of just distortion :)
Nailbomb, VHII, Warpig 7, MQ, Black Dog, 10th Anniversary

MDV

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
  • If it sounds good it IS good
Re: Damage control demonizer
« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2009, 09:17:36 PM »
The reamper is great. Reamping in general is gods gift to recording.

It is a bit weird hearing your playing through an amp, indistiguishable from normal, without a guitar in your hands though.

But it really takes a lot of headache out of recording. You get a tone you can *tollerate* to record with (which is all I ever really did for finished stuff with the modeller clips I posted) and you focus on getting good takes, then you find a sound. Shear genius.

And it makes editing so much easier! Having some transients that you can see and work with is a godsend- much nicer than having a square wave of just distortion :)

Oh, hell yes. When you have just a clean tone (not even "clean" - its the pickup, straight in, plus NOTHING) there, and you dont care about the distortion sound you recorded first (which is just for comfort/show) its totally and utterly ALL there, bare bones as you can get, for your analysis of your playing.

dheim

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1945
  • DON'TPANIC!
Re: Damage control demonizer
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2009, 11:28:30 AM »
i just tried the demonizer (on the clean channel of a tube amp) and found it weak and thin. as pedal distortions usually are... but my experience is very limited, i dropped it after 5 minutes of unsatisfactory testing...
Mule, MQ, Stockholm, CS, RY, MM, PK, ANB, CNB, AWP, CWP, PiG90...

too many? ;)

MDV

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
  • If it sounds good it IS good
Re: Damage control demonizer
« Reply #8 on: March 05, 2009, 12:28:14 PM »
Thanks Dheim

dheim

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1945
  • DON'TPANIC!
Re: Damage control demonizer
« Reply #9 on: March 05, 2009, 01:48:32 PM »
Thanks Dheim

it's alway a pleasure, sir...  :lol:
Mule, MQ, Stockholm, CS, RY, MM, PK, ANB, CNB, AWP, CWP, PiG90...

too many? ;)

Johnny Mac

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5841
    • Ultimate Guitar Profile
Re: Damage control demonizer
« Reply #10 on: March 08, 2009, 08:09:40 PM »
The reamper is great. Reamping in general is gods gift to recording.

It is a bit weird hearing your playing through an amp, indistiguishable from normal, without a guitar in your hands though.

But it really takes a lot of headache out of recording. You get a tone you can *tollerate* to record with (which is all I ever really did for finished stuff with the modeller clips I posted) and you focus on getting good takes, then you find a sound. Shear genius.

And it makes editing so much easier! Having some transients that you can see and work with is a godsend- much nicer than having a square wave of just distortion :)

Oh, hell yes. When you have just a clean tone (not even "clean" - its the pickup, straight in, plus NOTHING) there, and you dont care about the distortion sound you recorded first (which is just for comfort/show) its totally and utterly ALL there, bare bones as you can get, for your analysis of your playing.


 8) This sounds good! I'm gonna get one  :D

Warpig, MQ,
Miracle Man-Trilogy Suite, Cold Sweats, Black Guards, Rebel Yells & Irish Tours!