Username: Password:

Author Topic: P90s to replace my Riff Raffs  (Read 1217 times)

dano

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 17
P90s to replace my Riff Raffs
« on: September 01, 2009, 09:54:01 PM »
I've got a set of BKP Riff Raffs in my Epi SG, sound great and give me that Angus soudn I'd been after. I'm now more into a P90 sound, thinking of swapping them out a set of P90's - any recommendations ?

dave_mc

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 9796
Re: P90s to replace my Riff Raffs
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2009, 11:09:52 PM »
you realise p90s are a different size to humbuckers, right? you're going to have to go with humbucker-sized p90s, most likely (unless you've got one of the big pickguard models which covers the pickup routes, and in that case you'd have to get a new pickguard, plus it still might not work, i'm not sure, as i think most p90s are mounted to the body, not the pickguard), which means either the mississippi queen or the manhattan, i think. I haven't tried either of them, hopefully someone else can help with that. :)

dano

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: P90s to replace my Riff Raffs
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2009, 08:44:41 AM »
you realise p90s are a different size to humbuckers, right? you're going to have to go with humbucker-sized p90s, most likely (unless you've got one of the big pickguard models which covers the pickup routes, and in that case you'd have to get a new pickguard, plus it still might not work, i'm not sure, as i think most p90s are mounted to the body, not the pickguard), which means either the mississippi queen or the manhattan, i think. I haven't tried either of them, hopefully someone else can help with that. :)

Thanks for that, I was envisaging needimng to go with HB sized P90s. I'll check out teh Manhattans and Mississippi QUeens then.

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: P90s to replace my Riff Raffs
« Reply #3 on: September 02, 2009, 09:12:47 AM »
I found Mississippi Queens to be pretty hot, fat and warm.  I didn't think they had the high end detail of a true P90.  Just something to be aware of - they're not exactly the same as P90s, they're an approximation.

AndyR

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4715
  • Where's all the top end gone?
    • My Offerings
Re: P90s to replace my Riff Raffs
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2009, 10:25:33 AM »
I replaced Riff Raffs with MQs in an Epiphone SG - so I spose I better respond!

My Epi SG was very hard/bright sounding, and after the initial "oh yeah :D", I actually found the MQs "too much" in that guitar.

They did the same Angussy stuff as the RRs did, and they were "instant early Black Sabbath", they seemed a lot more versatile and responsive to pick attack and volume controls. But I had to turn down treble and gain on my amp models.

The Riff Raffs went into my, then new, Gibson Explorer. They sounded loads better in there than they had in the SG. Then a few string changes later, the pickups swapped again - RRs back to the SG, the MQs into the Explorer, just as an experiment. My MQ/Explorer combination turned out to be a marriage made in heaven for me - unlikely to change.

The SG (with RRs) went back in the attic!!!

Finally, a few weeks back, I gave in to the whisperings in my head and tracked down a decent, resonant, Gibson SG Faded. Put the RRs in her, and I've been playing little else since... :D

Comparison of RR and MQ?? (Bear in mind this is based on them both being in the Epi SG [hard/bright] and the Gibbo Explorer [dark/warm/resonant], over a year ago, before I fully conquered pickup height adjustment to my satisfaction).

I found the MQs possibly more powerful than the RRs - they push my amp models harder when in the same guitar.

The RRs are "tighter" sounding, I tend to describe the MQs as "hairy" in comparison - not sure if that'll help :lol:

In my Epi SG, the MQs were too bright, the RRs "ok".

In the Gibbo Explorer, the RRs were "nice" but actually a bit weedy, not a lot of distinctive character to the sounds coming out of the speakers - but I only found this out when I put the MQs in instead. The MQs in the Explorer sound "more", a lot more expressive.

.... I think, for me it would all depend on how does your SG sound accoustically? If it's quite bright/hard, "harsh" even, then the MQs are going to take all of that and stick it straight through your speakers - much more than the RRs do - that might be what you want? :lol:

It wasn't what I wanted, I was expecting bluesier, not more mellow maybe, but something along those lines. I didn't get it in my SG - I got blistering top end and upper mids... very nice, but a bit much for me all the time :lol:. But in the Explorer, boy-oh-boy, my MQs are just what I want - like Twinfan says, hot, fat and warm... but they have the bite to get through that massive lump of mahogany. The RRs only seemed to cut through with the top end, they seemed to leave the detail in the lower end and mids behind on my Explorer!


Sorry that rambles a bit... not sure it will help, but I hope it does a little.
« Last Edit: September 02, 2009, 10:27:42 AM by AndyR »
Play or Download AndyR Music at http://www.alonetone.com/andyr

dave_mc

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 9796
Re: P90s to replace my Riff Raffs
« Reply #5 on: September 02, 2009, 08:13:29 PM »
Thanks for that, I was envisaging needimng to go with HB sized P90s. I'll check out teh Manhattans and Mississippi QUeens then.

no problem, just making sure :)

syr2012

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 274
Re: P90s to replace my Riff Raffs
« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2009, 04:41:18 AM »
You want MQs. Manhattans are, IMO, quite calm and would be better suited in a jazzbox of sorts
BKP Team: Bridge MQ, Black. Bridge HD, Raw Nickel.
To Do: Bridge Nailbomb in chrome (?)