Username: Password:

Author Topic: Bugera's next target  (Read 10263 times)

dave_mc

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 9796
Re: Bugera's next target
« Reply #30 on: March 30, 2010, 08:57:51 PM »
^ Yeah, I thought I'd better put that in before some smart-alec piped up to say, "But £727 (or whatever it is) is pretty much $1500", the prices don't need to be as low in Europe because Mesa prices are so much higher. Ditto the peaveys and bugera peavey models (presumably). Would also be very interesting if all those other companies you mentioned start appearing- especially if they have a better reliability record than bugera. What also might happen is that Mesa might try to undercut the copies with offshore models, like Fender and Gibson did with Squier and Epiphone (and which Soldano is doing now with Jet City). Any way you slice it, more choice is a good thing, if you ask me- take it (especially at the inflated European prices) or leave it isn't much of a choice. :lol:

going back to the peaveys, what worries me about the 6260 is (a) the digital reverb (not a major problem if it can be switched out of the circuit 100% if it sounds like ass, but spring would be better) and (b) the lack of the resonance knob, which is more problematic. Maybe it still sounds fairly close, but on the 5150 you can fine-tune the resonance. By the looks of things, the cleans are better too- bugera isn't really touting it as a 5150, but more as "an improved 5150"... and we all know what "improved" means. :lol:

though the mesa ones do seem to be closer copies, just by looking at the specs and knobs etc. (though obviously that's not foolproof, lol).
« Last Edit: March 30, 2010, 09:00:25 PM by dave_mc »

dheim

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1945
  • DON'TPANIC!
Re: Bugera's next target
« Reply #31 on: April 03, 2010, 07:21:43 PM »
^ Yeah, I thought I'd better put that in before some smart-alec piped up to say, "But £727 (or whatever it is) is pretty much $1500", the prices don't need to be as low in Europe because Mesa prices are so much higher. Ditto the peaveys and bugera peavey models (presumably). Would also be very interesting if all those other companies you mentioned start appearing- especially if they have a better reliability record than bugera. What also might happen is that Mesa might try to undercut the copies with offshore models, like Fender and Gibson did with Squier and Epiphone (and which Soldano is doing now with Jet City). Any way you slice it, more choice is a good thing, if you ask me- take it (especially at the inflated European prices) or leave it isn't much of a choice. :lol:

going back to the peaveys, what worries me about the 6260 is (a) the digital reverb (not a major problem if it can be switched out of the circuit 100% if it sounds like ass, but spring would be better) and (b) the lack of the resonance knob, which is more problematic. Maybe it still sounds fairly close, but on the 5150 you can fine-tune the resonance. By the looks of things, the cleans are better too- bugera isn't really touting it as a 5150, but more as "an improved 5150"... and we all know what "improved" means. :lol:

though the mesa ones do seem to be closer copies, just by looking at the specs and knobs etc. (though obviously that's not foolproof, lol).

reverb on the 333xl sounds GREAT. i didn't compare the 6260 and the 5150 side to side, but someone on the web did, and it actually seems an improved version, less fizzy and with more bass.
Mule, MQ, Stockholm, CS, RY, MM, PK, ANB, CNB, AWP, CWP, PiG90...

too many? ;)

dave_mc

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 9796
Re: Bugera's next target
« Reply #32 on: April 03, 2010, 10:38:15 PM »
thanks :)

gwEm

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 7456
    • http://www.preromanbritain.com/gwem
Re: Bugera's next target
« Reply #33 on: April 05, 2010, 09:47:59 PM »
^ Yeah, I thought I'd better put that in before some smart-alec piped up to say, "But £727 (or whatever it is) is pretty much $1500", the prices don't need to be as low in Europe because Mesa prices are so much higher. Ditto the peaveys and bugera peavey models (presumably). Would also be very interesting if all those other companies you mentioned start appearing- especially if they have a better reliability record than bugera. What also might happen is that Mesa might try to undercut the copies with offshore models, like Fender and Gibson did with Squier and Epiphone (and which Soldano is doing now with Jet City). Any way you slice it, more choice is a good thing, if you ask me- take it (especially at the inflated European prices) or leave it isn't much of a choice. :lol:

going back to the peaveys, what worries me about the 6260 is (a) the digital reverb (not a major problem if it can be switched out of the circuit 100% if it sounds like ass, but spring would be better) and (b) the lack of the resonance knob, which is more problematic. Maybe it still sounds fairly close, but on the 5150 you can fine-tune the resonance. By the looks of things, the cleans are better too- bugera isn't really touting it as a 5150, but more as "an improved 5150"... and we all know what "improved" means. :lol:

though the mesa ones do seem to be closer copies, just by looking at the specs and knobs etc. (though obviously that's not foolproof, lol).

reverb on the 333xl sounds GREAT. i didn't compare the 6260 and the 5150 side to side, but someone on the web did, and it actually seems an improved version, less fizzy and with more bass.

yeah, i saw that - was sorely tempted by a 6260 for a while, but i think i'm over it ;)
Quote from: AndyR
you wouldn't use the meat knife on crusty bread but, equally, the serrated knife and straight edge knife aren't going to go through raw meat as quickly