Username: Password:

Poll

Which one would fit my needs more?

Stockholm
1 (11.1%)
Supermassive
6 (66.7%)
'Pig 90
2 (22.2%)

Total Members Voted: 9

Author Topic: Lollar vs Supermassive vs 'Pig 90  (Read 6867 times)

Telerocker

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 7433
Re: Lollar vs Supermassive vs 'Pig 90
« Reply #15 on: March 14, 2012, 11:25:46 PM »
Lollars have a lot of fans too. I have still a Suhr teleset lying around and those are nice pickups as well. It just depends on what kind of music you play and the tone you're after.
Mules, VHII, Crawler, MM's, IT's, BG50's.

Fowl2338

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Re: Lollar vs Supermassive vs 'Pig 90
« Reply #16 on: March 15, 2012, 03:02:59 PM »
I should have included the Stockholm in the poll as well.

Cool beans, so clearly the Lollar is not what I'm looking for.
Now if I could just decide between the 3 BKP's.


I initially really wanted the Pig 90, but I'm just apprehensive as to any lack of "crunch" or top end "bite".
"Too fat"?


Than I'm afraid that the Supermassive won't have enough "oomph" to push my preamps.


Which leads me to believe the the Stockholm might be the happy medium?

I emailed Tim, but never got a response.

Fowl2338

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Re: Lollar vs Supermassive vs 'Pig 90
« Reply #17 on: July 16, 2012, 04:17:14 PM »
Revisiting this topic as the Tele is just about to be finished (been really busy -- took longer than usual)


I decided I wanted a little more output than the Supermassive, so I'm now deciding between the Stockholm and Pig 90.


Of those who have experience, which one has more "crunch"?
I tend to prefer raunchy mids, like in a Duncan Distortion.

Fowl2338

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Re: Lollar vs Supermassive vs 'Pig 90
« Reply #18 on: July 24, 2012, 02:45:11 PM »
bump ^^