^ Ah I suppose. I'd also agree that it sucks they were discontinued, but if they weren't making anything on them...
With those kind of prices (granted its been reduced but just proves deals are there to be the had for those who look) on a full fat 24, it's really a no brainer. especially comparing US hardware to the Offshore hardware that seems to be in use on the S2..
Yeah I think that's the thing. If you compare RRPs, then the S2s might seem to be a good deal. If you compare the prices that you'll actually end up paying if you have any sense at all (i.e. you have the wit to shop around), then not so much.
It's not just PRS who is guilty of this, though, to be fair- I frequently see people saying, "Such-and-such a guitar is a good deal, its RRP is whatever and better guitars' RRPs are way higher", but that's not really the point. It doesn't much matter what the RRP is if I can walk into a guitar shop (or order online) and buy the supposedly-much-dearer/better guitar for far less!
I'm with you and Dave in other words. I'm not really in any danger of buying a PRS, but if I were, I'd be looking at those custom 24s for only slightly more (comparatively) than the S2s. I remember at one point that X series was being blown out for like Ģ550 once it became apparent they weren't selling. I chickened out then, but if I did, I'm hardly gonna pay Ģ1250 for an S2, lol.
I'm also not overly suprised by the magazine reviews, for as long as I've been reading them most of them have been little more than glorified adverts. I know guitarist refused to mention japanese tokais (and similar japanese copies) when they reviewed gibsons, for example. Thinking they have our best interests at heart is possibly a little naive...