Username: Password:

Author Topic: TSL 100 vs. JCM800 2203 metal clips  (Read 3487 times)

keano

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 129
TSL 100 vs. JCM800 2203 metal clips
« on: January 23, 2007, 07:02:59 AM »
Just wanted to compare TSL VPR against the 100 watts of each. What sucks is I am not making music any more all I f**king do is make clips lately and can't stop. Depressing seriously. Anyway playing is cr@p timing is off but I am burned out and one take is all I am gave it. So take a listen.

These are the high gain clips. Same thing blind test just your favorite out of the folder.

Thanks for feeding the obsession!

Each folder contains a similar riff. Out of those folder you pick the one you like best.
ex:
A - 4
B - 8 so on

http://media-creations.net/clips2.html

keano

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 129
TSL 100 vs. JCM800 2203 metal clips
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2007, 11:10:33 PM »
bump

gwEm

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 7456
    • http://www.preromanbritain.com/gwem
TSL 100 vs. JCM800 2203 metal clips
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2007, 01:59:41 PM »
more marked differences this time.

favourites are:

1 from group A
10 from group B
16 from group C
Quote from: AndyR
you wouldn't use the meat knife on crusty bread but, equally, the serrated knife and straight edge knife aren't going to go through raw meat as quickly

keano

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 129
TSL 100 vs. JCM800 2203 metal clips
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2007, 05:51:36 PM »
thanks. so far A is  clear winner from this and other forums. Debate on C still

genocidal tendencies

  • Guest
TSL 100 vs. JCM800 2203 metal clips
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2007, 06:40:48 PM »
I can't get the page to load, is that just me?

keano

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 129
TSL 100 vs. JCM800 2203 metal clips
« Reply #5 on: January 24, 2007, 07:02:18 PM »

genocidal tendencies

  • Guest
TSL 100 vs. JCM800 2203 metal clips
« Reply #6 on: January 24, 2007, 07:18:53 PM »
Me too now, how odd.

Peter Antal

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 438
TSL 100 vs. JCM800 2203 metal clips
« Reply #7 on: January 24, 2007, 07:43:17 PM »
A - 7
B - 10
C - 19

:)

Canadian Steve

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 356
TSL 100 vs. JCM800 2203 metal clips
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2007, 09:37:17 PM »
A - 1
B - 12
C - 17
BKPS: Cryogenic Apache set, Mule set, Riff Raff, Stormy Monday.

keano

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 129
TSL 100 vs. JCM800 2203 metal clips
« Reply #9 on: January 25, 2007, 03:07:43 AM »
Thanks guys answers are:

A.
1. JCM800 Hot Plate -4, Vol. 2.5 w/SD-1 Keeley 9-11-12
2. TSL in 25VPR mode, Vol.3, Gain 8
3. Same as 3 but with ZW-44 OD.
4. TSL full 100 watts. Gain 8 Vol 2 used clean boost on solo
7. Same as #1 but with HP-8 and vol. 3

B
8. Same as 3
9. Same as 2
10. Same as 1
11. Same as 4
12. Same 1 BUT using MXR EQ +6 +6

C
16. same as 3
17. same as 2
18. same as 4
19. same as 1

Peter Antal

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 438
TSL 100 vs. JCM800 2203 metal clips
« Reply #10 on: January 25, 2007, 10:08:02 AM »
Seems like people preferred the JCM800 this time. Nice thread! 8)

keano

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 129
TSL 100 vs. JCM800 2203 metal clips
« Reply #11 on: January 25, 2007, 04:43:01 PM »
Also posted this at MArshall amp forum and Seymour Duncan forum. and results were A-1, B-10, C-18 had edge and 19 close behind.