Username: Password:

Author Topic: Covered or not (the difference)  (Read 2841 times)

Pale Rider

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 200
Re: Covered or not (the difference)
« Reply #15 on: January 19, 2011, 11:10:36 AM »
Every time I read a line like "Tim changes the wind" the picture coming to mind is Tim making some weird voodoo stuff and changing the direction the wind is blowing. lol

Anyway seriously now....the covers lower the resonance frequency of the pickup and weakens the amplitude in that frequecy. That can be compensated by the wind. If not exactly, closely enough.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2011, 11:12:41 AM by Nuke »
Painkiller :: Miracle Man :: Holydiver :: Trilogies

::::::::::::::: ME(N)TAL DISTORTION ::::::::::::::

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: Covered or not (the difference)
« Reply #16 on: January 19, 2011, 11:46:47 AM »
Nice response,thanks ,so would you say then that the covers are in a way a mild noisegate,ironing out a bit of string catching etc....when played.So without covers a tad more raw.

That's exactly my experience, yes  :)

St.James

  • Guest
Re: Covered or not (the difference)
« Reply #17 on: January 19, 2011, 04:18:27 PM »
.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2011, 10:29:04 AM by St.James »

giboovhull

  • Strawweight
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Covered or not (the difference)
« Reply #18 on: January 19, 2011, 06:11:03 PM »
Wow you know your stuff man,bet you play a mean fiddle too,Ive been playing acoustic a few years,and decided it was time for electric so bought prs tremonti se, nice guitar all in all ,I do like playing the blues ,and on the other hand Foo,s purple hendrix etc,,,,so I think my mind is set on covered mules good all rounder as told ,whats your take on this decision,this is my last post on the matter hopefully ,then its time to exchange my hard earned cash,thanks again :).

St.James

  • Guest
Re: Covered or not (the difference)
« Reply #19 on: March 05, 2011, 04:00:36 PM »
 8)
« Last Edit: April 23, 2011, 10:28:34 AM by St.James »

Afghan Dave

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3315
Re: Covered or not (the difference)
« Reply #20 on: March 05, 2011, 04:12:19 PM »
most of this has already been said

 PDT_038 PDT_039 PDT_040 PDT_043 PDT_045 PDT_046 PDT_047
"There's more knowledge on these boards than there are necks under PhillyQ's bed"

WezV

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5838
    • http://wezvenables.co.uk
Re: Covered or not (the difference)
« Reply #21 on: March 05, 2011, 04:34:49 PM »
lets have less talk of afgans 'senior member' ;)

Afghan Dave

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3315
Re: Covered or not (the difference)
« Reply #22 on: March 05, 2011, 04:37:07 PM »
"Dave Jr" is equally responsive covered or uncovered.
"There's more knowledge on these boards than there are necks under PhillyQ's bed"

Alex

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2004
Re: Covered or not (the difference)
« Reply #23 on: March 09, 2011, 02:42:07 PM »
So if I had the cover removed from my Nailbomb, would it become more responsive and somewhat brighter?
Current BKPs: Miracle Man, Nailbomb, Juggernaut, VHII
Past BKPS: Holy Diver, Trilogy Suite, Sinner, Black Dog

dheim

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1945
  • DON'TPANIC!
Re: Covered or not (the difference)
« Reply #24 on: March 09, 2011, 04:41:02 PM »
So if I had the cover removed from my Nailbomb, would it become more responsive and somewhat brighter?

i don't think the response is affected, but it will sound a tad brighter and more "open".
you can get the same effect deconnecting the tone pot and your NB will look just as good as it does now! ;)
Mule, MQ, Stockholm, CS, RY, MM, PK, ANB, CNB, AWP, CWP, PiG90...

too many? ;)