Username: Password:

Author Topic: NAD - Magnum 44  (Read 3454 times)

gwEm

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 7456
    • http://www.preromanbritain.com/gwem
NAD - Magnum 44
« on: December 11, 2016, 11:55:58 AM »
Some of you probably saw my other thread about me looking for a very small and light gigging amp. A little too late P'n'H warned me about the Magnum 44, but I'd ordered one anyway.

So what do I think?

First thing to say is that although the Magnum 44 is the size of a small/medium guitar pedal, it comes with a power supply that is twice as large. No matter, I expected that and it's still small.

Second thing to say is that the instructions state that the amp is 25 watts RMS into 8 ohms. Worth keeping in mind, it's not 44 watts.

Out the box I was very disappointed with the Magnum 44. There was a loud hum. I figured this might be a ground loop, so I switched to using pedals with batteries but it was still there. So probably, I thought it's the cr@ppy power block they supplied. One star out of five - unusable except for cleans.

Checking on google for Magnum 44 power supply showed me several forum threads with people reporting similar problems. The solution people reported was to ground the chassis of the pedal to earth. Actually, this is what most guitar amps do anyway.

I checked with my multimeter and indeed the chassis was not connected to earth. So I proceeded to open the power supply and I soldered a wire from earth to the DC ground, which is connected to the amp chassis.

This reduced the noise level greatly. Not completely, in fact it is still quite noisy compared to my valve amps, but it's not too bad and definitely usable.

The head is certainly loud, I don't doubt the 25w RMS rating. You could definitely do small gigs with it without micing it up.

Tonewise, the unit is rather dark. You need that bright switch on all the time. I have no idea why they have that normal mode. They should make bright the normal and add a brighter setting. 'Normal' is completely unusable unless you are running a bright strat into it clean. Anyway, with the bright switch on its fine.

P'n'H warned me the tone would be undefined without a couple of good pedals to make it acceptable. In fact, I see what he means. I would put it a bit differently though. The tone is definitely undefined unless you use the right pedals into it. It seems to be rather fussy in fact. Some of my favourite pedals and guitars sounded pretty bad through the Magnum 44. But I did find some combinations that really worked. My MI Audio Crunch box plus Cold Sweat loaded Fender Cyclone sounded really good through it for example. I found I had to set most distortions boxes to a bright setting. It refused to work well with my normal Sansamp pedal. It did work well with my Sabbra Cadabra pedal though.

I would definitely you can get good tones out of it, but it needs the right pedal(s) and some experimentation. Don't expect to plug your normal pedals into it, it won't necessarily work out.

Overall, once I finished building their power supply for them, I give the Magnum 44 three stars out of five.

The pedal will fit into a jeans pocket, though you have to have more space for the power supply. You can definitely put the whole setup into a gig bag though - which is good enough in my opinion! And it is loud enough for a small gig. You can get it to sound pretty good with some playing around.

But - I had to modify the power supply! That's really bad in my point of view. It should be earthed out the box like any guitar amp. And yes, it is a bit noisy and fussy about what you plug in.

No denying though - it's small loud and usable. So overall I am happy. But with some caveats.

Quote from: AndyR
you wouldn't use the meat knife on crusty bread but, equally, the serrated knife and straight edge knife aren't going to go through raw meat as quickly

Plenum n Heather

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 689
  • BKPs:
Re: NAD - Magnum 44
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2016, 11:27:53 PM »
Excellent, detailed review!

Glad you got it to where you like it, nothing is worse than buying a piece of kit an realizng it won't work for you.

The live band version of As Follows is almost ready to gig, but I think I will need something a bit more 'prog' (ie, over the top lol)  for those gigs.

Telerocker

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 7433
Re: NAD - Magnum 44
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2016, 12:19:06 AM »
Nice review. Apparently it is not a pedal that really saves a player when his amp dies on stage. Too much drawbacks: you need the right pedals...
Mules, VHII, Crawler, MM's, IT's, BG50's.

Dave Sloven

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4312
    • Get our album here (alnico Black Hawks)
Re: NAD - Magnum 44
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2016, 12:30:59 AM »
« Last Edit: December 12, 2016, 12:35:18 AM by Agent Orange »
BLACK HAWKS
IMPULSES
COBRA-T
WAR PIGS
STOCKHOLM
COLD SWEATS
MIRACLE MAN
TRUE GRIT

https://slovendoom.bandcamp.com/releases

gwEm

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 7456
    • http://www.preromanbritain.com/gwem
Re: NAD - Magnum 44
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2016, 11:23:34 PM »
I looked into one of those Piranha heads. I watched reviews from Chappers and also Fluff.

Chappers seemed out to put it down for some reason. I thought it sounded better than he was saying. Anyway, he said it was a bedroom/recording amp volume wise. Fluff also said it was more of a bedroom amp and not really giggable.

Now, the head is (I believe) 15w into 8ohms, 20w into 4ohms. From that it sounds like it could be giggable to me, especially with Philking gigging with a 5w solid state head and having no problems.

Anyway, with those guys saying the Piranha wasn't that loud I decided to leave it. I liked the sound of it in the demos I've seen. Didn't sound that bad to me!

Here's the Fluff video: https://youtu.be/heVFy-GcIX0
« Last Edit: December 12, 2016, 11:26:12 PM by gwEm »
Quote from: AndyR
you wouldn't use the meat knife on crusty bread but, equally, the serrated knife and straight edge knife aren't going to go through raw meat as quickly