Username: Password:

Author Topic: New PU's for a Flying V?  (Read 2774 times)

mortenoppenheim

  • Strawweight
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • BKPs:
New PU's for a Flying V?
« on: April 30, 2018, 09:24:10 AM »
Hi guys. I want to change the stock Burstbucker pro's in my Flying V 120, to a set of BKP's. I am considering the Warpigs or the Painkillers. Both ceramic. Soundwise, I am going for old-shool deathmetal, and perhaps a little Slipknot chugging. Think Boss HM-2. What's your opinions? And are there any difference, soundwise, to the PU's being covered or uncovered?

Dave Sloven

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4312
    • Get our album here (alnico Black Hawks)
Re: New PU's for a Flying V?
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2018, 09:42:33 AM »
You'll have a hard time picking the difference through a HM-2!
BLACK HAWKS
IMPULSES
COBRA-T
WAR PIGS
STOCKHOLM
COLD SWEATS
MIRACLE MAN
TRUE GRIT

https://slovendoom.bandcamp.com/releases

mortenoppenheim

  • Strawweight
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • BKPs:
Re: New PU's for a Flying V?
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2018, 10:21:07 AM »
You'll have a hard time picking the difference through a HM-2!

Hehe, good point. I won't be using the Hm-2 exclusively. Just for the occational swedish deathmetal fix. For the other stuff, I will be playing through a Randall Thrasher or a Katana Head. Cab is a Randall RG412.

Dave Sloven

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4312
    • Get our album here (alnico Black Hawks)
Re: New PU's for a Flying V?
« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2018, 10:44:13 AM »
I still think the difference between covered and uncovered is pretty minimal.  Uncovered will be slightly brighter if there is any difference at all.  With the 120th model being a pickguard mount I would probably stick with covers.  All mahogany, set neck probably I would go for the Painkillers, Miracle Man, or Ragnarok.

Warpigs can sometimes be a bit too dark, certainly in Explorers, not sure about Vs.

BLACK HAWKS
IMPULSES
COBRA-T
WAR PIGS
STOCKHOLM
COLD SWEATS
MIRACLE MAN
TRUE GRIT

https://slovendoom.bandcamp.com/releases

mortenoppenheim

  • Strawweight
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • BKPs:
Re: New PU's for a Flying V?
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2018, 07:37:53 AM »
Yearh, Tim also recommended the Painkillers. Ceramic that is. But I'm a bit worried, that They will be to bright/harsh? BTW, should I choose long or short leg versions, for pickguard-mounting? I don't plan to coil-split, but should I go for the 4-conducters anyway?

timmy_pix

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 113
  • BKPs:
Re: New PU's for a Flying V?
« Reply #5 on: May 03, 2018, 11:06:09 AM »
Your guitar is (I assume) a big old lump of mahogany so I would imagine the Painkillers would take quite nicely to it. You may as well go 4-conductor just in case you want to try any wiring mods later on; better to have it and not need it, rather than want it and have to rewire them/order new pickups.
BKPs owned:
Stormy Mondays, Mules, Emeralds, 10ths, Mothers Milks, Nantucket, Black Dogs, Holydivers, A-bombs, Warpigs, Sinners, Cold Sweats

mortenoppenheim

  • Strawweight
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • BKPs:
Re: New PU's for a Flying V?
« Reply #6 on: May 03, 2018, 11:27:28 AM »
Your guitar is (I assume) a big old lump of mahogany so I would imagine the Painkillers would take quite nicely to it. You may as well go 4-conductor just in case you want to try any wiring mods later on; better to have it and not need it, rather than want it and have to rewire them/order new pickups.

Actually, I took the dive and went for a set of C-Pigs. The 120 V is not that big of a lump, compared to other V's. Thin C neck and not that dark sounding, I've got an Epi Brent Hinds too and that's one massive slab of wood!!