Username: Password:

Author Topic: Potted vs. Unpotted  (Read 8738 times)

CaffeineJunkie

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1306
Potted vs. Unpotted
« Reply #15 on: July 24, 2006, 03:56:04 PM »
especially not from a microphonic dimarzio :p
PRS Starla for sale, see Seconds out section...

deg0ey

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1083
Potted vs. Unpotted
« Reply #16 on: July 24, 2006, 03:57:14 PM »
Maybe the following sentence would work better:

"Your live sound is shitee. You're out of the band unless you buy BKPs and learn to EQ properly :drink: "

Ok, so that's a bit harsh - but it would work :P
Founding Member of the "Tim's Hair Fanclub" - PM to Join

Join us; or you shall be slain

carlaz

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1061
Potted vs. Unpotted
« Reply #17 on: July 24, 2006, 05:04:04 PM »
Tempting ;) but that would be a lot like work! :roll:
"Lords of rock ... grace us with your mighty love ...."
http://soundcloud.com/carledlundanderson
http://soundcloud.com/espada-negra

Fourth Feline

  • Guest
Potted vs. Unpotted
« Reply #18 on: July 24, 2006, 07:49:39 PM »
I love this forum;

it not only teaches pickup 'savvy' but also lessons in tact and diplomacy ...

 :lol:

Canadian Steve

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 356
Potted vs. Unpotted
« Reply #19 on: July 24, 2006, 10:15:09 PM »
Quote from: carlaz
I do remind him at every opportunity, though that said, I haven't yet succeeded in convincing him that scooping his mids so brutally doesn't sound as good in a mix as it does alone in his bedroom, either ;)


I used to always scoop my mids as well and wonder why I got lost in the mix!  Now I boost them and it works better in the mix! :band5:
BKPS: Cryogenic Apache set, Mule set, Riff Raff, Stormy Monday.