Username: Password:

Author Topic: Déa  (Read 26997 times)

FELINEGUITARS

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6609
  • London & Southeast's Number 1 BKP stockist
    • http://www.felineguitars.com
Déa
« Reply #15 on: September 06, 2005, 08:24:27 PM »
that's a pretty guitar and should sound wonderful - ENJOY!!
www.felineguitars.com - repairs & custom built
Great fretwork!
Buy your BKPs & Earvana from ME!

Bob Johnson

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 445
    • http://www.legraguitars.co.uk
Déa
« Reply #16 on: September 07, 2005, 05:25:25 PM »
That's really nice Peterku. You're gonna get attached to that.
Regards,
Bob Johnson
Legra Guitars

big steve

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 430
Déa
« Reply #17 on: September 07, 2005, 05:40:20 PM »
can you get a decent lead tone out of the bridge mule? i've been considering an emerald bridge, mule IV neck.
down from the glens came the marching men...

jt

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1575
Déa
« Reply #18 on: September 07, 2005, 09:05:53 PM »
:D Yep just to ad my two peneth worth i think that looks great !!
i hope she plays as well as she looks !

 :D  8)
God I could do with a Gin & Tonic !

_tom_

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 8842
Déa
« Reply #19 on: September 07, 2005, 09:09:29 PM »
Quote from: big steve
can you get a decent lead tone out of the bridge mule? i've been considering an emerald bridge, mule IV neck.


I like my Mule in my Epi LP for leads, if thats any help :lol:

Peterku

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
Déa
« Reply #20 on: September 07, 2005, 10:42:56 PM »
Quote from: big steve
can you get a decent lead tone out of the bridge mule?

Definitely. Much more than merely 'decent'.

A calibrated set might have an advantage over another combination: in the middle position of the switch I get a clean tone from my Mules that's pure quack. I can even play acoustic parts on my Artist now! But it's just my theory, and maybe the Mule+Emerald combo would also give a relatively nice quack tone. I don't know. Also note that I don't have any tone pots on my guitar, that might influence cleans.

Peterku

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
Déa
« Reply #21 on: September 07, 2005, 10:45:51 PM »
Thanks for the kind comments.

I only have one problem with the guitar: it really wants to be fitted with Dunlop 6000's! :wink:  :lol:

indysmith

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4713
    • Soundcloud
Déa
« Reply #22 on: September 10, 2005, 10:33:52 PM »
Totally loving that axe!!! i love the look of how its finished (or not finished?) bet she feels nice!  :lol:
LOVING the Mules!

Peterku

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
Déa
« Reply #23 on: September 10, 2005, 10:59:03 PM »
Quote from: indysmith
i love the look of how its finished (or not finished?) bet she feels nice!

Thanks. :) She has a satin finish. I don't know whether it's poly or nitro. It's enough to protect the wood but lets the body resonate freely. That's the concept of the guitar already: to be as natural as possible, to let the woods play the main role.

I didn't want wax or oil finish because I had seen some Framus guitars that only needed a few years to get REALLY dirty... :roll: On the other hand, those multi-layer glossy finishes found on PRS guitars felt like plastic to me. So the choice of natural satin finish was obvious. :)

WITH FULL DISTORTION

  • Guest
Déa
« Reply #24 on: September 11, 2005, 12:49:32 AM »
gorgeous gorgeous gorgeous
don´t you have any climatic problems with this natural finish of the guitar?!

38thBeatle

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6098
    • http://www.myspace.com/alteregoukband
Déa
« Reply #25 on: September 11, 2005, 01:18:31 AM »
Have you had a chance to have a good go at her?- If so, what do you think? Your forum Bro's need to know PeterKu.
Send three and fourpence we're going to a dance
BKP's: Apache, Country Boy, Slowhands.

Peterku

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
Déa
« Reply #26 on: September 11, 2005, 10:18:05 AM »
Quote from: WITH FULL DISTORTION
don´t you have any climatic problems with this natural finish of the guitar?!
I'll see it in winter. :lol: But honestly, I don't think so. Even with this finish, the pores of the wood are well sealed.

Peterku

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
Déa
« Reply #27 on: September 11, 2005, 11:09:13 AM »
Yesterday I had a rehearsal with my band. My amp's not ready yet, so I took my small hybrid practice combo (Kustom Tube12) to the place. I'm listing my impressions:

- That thick block of old mahogany sounds like thunder when played hard!!! 8) It's not the amount of mids or bass, but the feel of the sound. Very, very dense and heavy.

- The guitar's by far the heaviest axe I've ever played. By the end of the rehearsal my left arm got very tired at the shoulder, although I'm usually training every day. I'll need to switch between my Strat and this guitar at concerts.

- Despite the weight, the body resonates like mad, and has a strong clean acoustic sound I haven't heard from any LP before. Now I use Newtone 10-49's on the guitar, so it also has a nice tight feel.

- Now about the amplified sound: THE MULES ARE GREAT!!! :D They have lots of articulation and just the right amount of tightness for the music I play. At the rehearsal we played things ranging from funk to some heavy metal, and the three sounds I get from a set were just enough for that.

NECK: Surprisingly balanced. I was expecting to hear a bassy/slightly muddy sound (the sound I hear on LP's with different pickups), but I was wrong. Tim was right when he mentioned that as a LP player he knew how important it was for a neck pickup to sound clear and articulated. The neck Mule sounds clean and woooody. The sound of mahogany perfectly comes through, the sound reminds me of the acoustic sound of the guitar.

MIDDLE: My favourite... A clean quack sound with heaveny sparkle. That's the kind of sound I thought to be only possible with a Strat. But it's still different because it has the warmth of mahogany. The wound strings have that hollow metallic ring (not as much, though) as on a Strat in quack position, and the unwound strings are pure sparkle. Altogether, a nice acoustic type of sound.

BRIDGE: Again: balanced. 8) My practice combo has a range of gain more suited for classic rock, but still enough to make a Dimarzio Air Zone muddy. With the Mules I could max the gain and still hear individual notes in chords and things sounded bigger then ever! So low output doesn't necessarily mean you have to sacrifice definition, you have to work a lot more for it, though. Although perfectly balanced, the bridge Mule has a certain 'cut' I really like. It's kind of a singing quality with lots of attitude, which sounds good for blues. When chicken-picking some gritty bluesy licks, I could even hear some Tele character, but my ears might be wrong and I don't have a Tele either.

These Mules are cool pickups indeed, I'll make a more precise testing when my amp's ready at last. And some clips, of course. You must hear that quack sound... :D

willo

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1512
Déa
« Reply #28 on: September 11, 2005, 11:29:14 AM »
Sounds really nice, looks really nice...nice axe! :)

How much does she weigh, Peterku?
The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away...

Peterku

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
Déa
« Reply #29 on: September 11, 2005, 12:27:12 PM »
Quote from: willo
How much does she weigh, Peterku?

I don't know. I only got a rough minimal estimation with our weighing machine: around 6 kgs (13.2 pounds). So I guess it doesn't weigh more than 6.5 kgs (14.3 pounds).

I forgot to mention, the rehearsal was more than 3 hours long, and I forced standing most of the time to learn how much the guitar actually weighs. So the weight issue isn't really that bad. :)