I completely disagree. If you market yourself as a political band (marketing your politics being disgusting in the first place) and say from the outset that it's the message that matters, then it's probably best not to exist in complete hypocrisy to the "message" your sloganeering buffoon of a vocalist is giving out.
What do you mean by marketing politics? And if you mean advertising and promoting, then why is that disgusting?
Of course it does no good to your cause if the way you live contradicts your message, but that's beside my point, which is that the music can be enjoyed regardless of the lyrical content.
If your music is political, then the politics comes first
Why? Maybe to YOU it does, but not necessarily for everyone else.
Music is rhythm and pitch, not literature. Personally I enjoy everything about RATM, (lyrics included) but that doesn't mean I agree with every, or even any of the messages in the songs.
Will:
No, I really don't!really pisses me off. In the context of a song, it kinda shows to me that they couldn't be bothered to think of a real word to express how they feel.
Read Steven Pinker's new book. There is a whole section on how swearing evokes emotion more powerfully than words that are less offensive. :)
