What kinda worried me a little is that I get the distinct impression that for the BIG American names (and by that I mean Gibson, Fender and PRS), a lot of the money goes on the brand.
Don't get me wrong, I've played all three, and some have been amazing. I'm certainly not into bashing someone for their success, 'cos that's like Communism or something... But the idea of this thread was to open it up a little and get away from the traditional big three. Which is why Eastern brands such as Ibanez and Yamaha are interesting - I get the impression that the USA legacy doesn't apply, and that you may be paying for the guitar rather than the brand.
I may be hugely wrong about that though.
Eastern manufacture doesn't bother me - I've seen Chinese guitars that are superbly constructed. And of all the Telecasters that played recently in TPA, it was the Mexican 60's reissue that left all the others (includig the "North" American built models) for dead, in terms of its playability and sound.
So I guess that the £500 thing is more about value than anything else - it's an arbitrary figure - could have been 400, could have been 600. And as someone pointed out, factor in a set of Mules and pretty much any LP clone is going to kick some serious arse. But I want the best value guitar - that could be a £2000 PRS, or it could be the Squire that everyone raves on about.
Personally I think that I'm leaning towards a Swede with Mules... Or possibly drive to Croydon and go through Jonathans bins for some cast offs...
Mark.
-EDIT- "Ibanez" is a horrible word to type! And I'm a good typest!!!