Username: Password:

Author Topic: Gibson Dark Fire  (Read 3960 times)

Sifu Ben

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1328
    • http://www.swindonkungfu.co.uk
Re: Gibson Dark Fire
« Reply #15 on: November 16, 2008, 10:52:10 AM »
What's strange is that when you get down to it this is Jonny Mac's guitar which everyone loved with an idea Jimmy Page has been using for decades.
 Guitarists do seem to be this weirdly orthodox bunch. Bassists seem to embrace technology much more readily.
Cold Sweat, Nailbomb 7b, Cold Sweat 7n

QS-Nalle

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 105
    • http://www.tubesound.fi
Re: Gibson Dark Fire
« Reply #16 on: November 16, 2008, 11:48:42 AM »
You may quote me on this:

That guitar will suck ass.....if it's anything like the robot guitar, as an instrument that is.
why can't they just make something that works on the most basic level a guitar should work on.
Overpriced cr@p! YUCK!

Matt77

  • Guest
Re: Gibson Dark Fire
« Reply #17 on: December 17, 2008, 05:31:25 PM »
http://www.musicradar.com/news/guitars/justin-hawkins-launches-gibsons-dark-fire-guitar-187432

I didn't think it looked good, but it looks better than Justin Hawkins. He looks ill, hope it's just his eye shadow

Jonny

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2890
  • Seven-String Financial Analyst in Training
Re: Gibson Dark Fire
« Reply #18 on: December 17, 2008, 07:15:40 PM »
Why don't they just make a quality guitar, not something with excessive wiring.
"Would you like some lemon oil?"
"Oh, no thanks, I don't eat fruit."