Havent we been through the gear/player thing before?
Like, a meeeeeeeelion times?
yeah, definitely :lol:
it's certainly a bit of both, if you ask me. i just don't like the eejits (not that there are necessarily any here, i mean on other forums) who refuse to believe that either the player, or the gear (depending on their viewpoint) makes any diference AT ALL. :lol:
There's truth in this, but I think you have to get into really, really terrible gear before it starts to make a huge difference. A level of quality that virtually nothing you can buy in the current market new, obviously) falls below.
I've always kinda thought if you can't comfortably get through, say a wedding gig, with a bargain bucket squire and a cheap as chips transistor amp then you simply can't play guitar.
It's just the implied snobbery of the the more expensive the better opinion of a couple folk in this thread annoys me.
Being skint and getting on with what you've got does more for your tone than any amount of money will. Actually, I'm going to make that my mantra.
i disagree. there are plenty of new guitars and amps which i've tried which i wouldn't want to have to use. i could "get by" on them, but i don't see why i should have to. plus it depends on what i'm playing- if i'm just playing powerchords etc., i could get by on almost anything. if i'm trying to play a sweep-picked arpeggio at a million miles an hour, i need all the help i can get :lol: and seemingly minute differences in quality can make all the difference.
then there's the whole "personal preference" thing, where a neck shape isn't necessarily a measure of quality, but if it doesn't suit you, it can affect how well you play.