Username: Password:

Author Topic: Gibson Strat - no, really...  (Read 20023 times)

FernandoDuarte

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3978
Re: Gibson Strat - no, really...
« Reply #75 on: September 29, 2009, 07:33:52 PM »
I think a idea of a Strat with Jimmy Hendrix brand awesome!!! That signature on the headstock looks cool! But not made by Gibson and not as "start pack"


Ratrod

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5264
Re: Gibson Strat - no, really...
« Reply #76 on: September 30, 2009, 11:21:06 AM »
Like Juansolo already posted:

http://www.musicradar.com/news/guitars/gibson-launches-jimi-hendrix-piano-221720





Proof that the people at Gibson completely lost their mind.

 
BKP user since 2004: early 7K Blackguard 50

Will

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2599
Re: Gibson Strat - no, really...
« Reply #77 on: September 30, 2009, 12:01:31 PM »
I'll hold out for the Tom Murphy finished/relic piano

Prawnik

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 470
Re: Gibson Strat - no, really...
« Reply #78 on: September 30, 2009, 01:15:30 PM »
I think a idea of a Strat with Jimmy Hendrix brand awesome!!! That signature on the headstock looks cool! But not made by Gibson and not as "start pack"



I thought Fender had already released about 673.5 kinds of "Hendrix" Strats in every "voodoo" or "gypsy" and every other conceivable branding?

CaptainDesslock

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 554
Re: Gibson Strat - no, really...
« Reply #79 on: September 30, 2009, 03:48:47 PM »
Wow,

That guitar could've actually looked respectable if it wasn't for that stupid reversed bridge pickup! As for piano, well that's why you don't do drugs kids  :lol:
Rise above the crowds
Wade through toxic clouds
Breach the outer sphere
The edge of all our fears

FernandoDuarte

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3978
Re: Gibson Strat - no, really...
« Reply #80 on: September 30, 2009, 05:16:46 PM »
if it wasn't for that stupid reversed bridge pickup!

This is practically necessary a reverse bridge pickup on Hendrix signatures...

AndyR

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4715
  • Where's all the top end gone?
    • My Offerings
Re: Gibson Strat - no, really...
« Reply #81 on: September 30, 2009, 05:49:51 PM »
Yeah, I got no problems with a reverse bridge - I've never tried it, but I think I might get used to the tone, if it was good enough for Jimi, etc... :lol:

And think about it... no-one's gonna see it most of the time you're playing!

Years ago I used to have a hot-rails in a strat bridge position. Loved the sound for what I was playing at the time, but HATED what it looked like. One day my girlfriend at the time pointed out they couldn't see it when I was playing... and I was ok after that!
Play or Download AndyR Music at http://www.alonetone.com/andyr

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: Gibson Strat - no, really...
« Reply #82 on: September 30, 2009, 10:54:46 PM »
Robin Trower has used regular Strats with a reverse bridge pickup occasionally.  I'd like to try it.
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

PhilKing

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3655
Re: Gibson Strat - no, really...
« Reply #83 on: October 03, 2009, 09:39:58 AM »
I have an Irish Tour set with reverse magnet stagger and a reversed slant bridge pickup.  I also have a tele with a reverse slant bridge pickup.  It is a subtle change unless you reverse the magnet stagger (my tele is the 52 Blackguard set which has flat polepieces).   Obviously I have no problem with the look of it!
So many pickups, so little time

camf

  • Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 55
Re: Gibson Strat - no, really...
« Reply #84 on: October 04, 2009, 09:39:17 PM »
Pathetic Gibson... an all time low.