Username: Password:

Author Topic: low noise 12AX7's  (Read 5016 times)

Dmoney

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3577
low noise 12AX7's
« on: November 17, 2009, 11:46:15 PM »
yooo!
whats a good readily available low noise 12AX7.
lower the noise the better!

im after some spares for my sommatone. i usually use a mix of JJ 12AX7's.
some decent 6550's might be cool too



A friends of mine has an amp (not sure what) with a low frequency hum issue.
any causes of low freq hum you can think of? apparently its kinda loud.


EDIT: i usually get tubes from hotrox or watford valves.

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: low noise 12AX7's
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2009, 08:58:55 AM »
JJs work for me.

hunter

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5262
    • http://www.myspace.com/christophjaeger
Re: low noise 12AX7's
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2009, 10:13:06 AM »

With JJs I always feel a lack of openness and higher frequency content, but for noise they are good.

If I were you I'd look into TungSol 12AX7 as well as Ruby Highgrade (or TAD RT010). I also like the Penta Chinese that you can get from Dougstubes. A recent discovery I did was the Penta GT12AX7M, which is the GrooveTubes Mullard Reissue selected by Penta. Got a bunch of these cheap on ebay and like them for their meaty tone.

In the Steavens I now run a GT12AX7M in V1 and TungSols in the rest, a Chinese G9 in the Phase Driver.

I am also interested in 6550s and not sure which are best. They are freakin expensive though.
Tweaker's Paradise - Player's nightmare.

jpfamps

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 767
    • http://www.jpfamps.com
Re: low noise 12AX7's
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2009, 11:25:05 AM »
Noise will vary considerably in any batch of valves, so often vendors will select valves for low noise (at an extra charge!!), although it is very hard to find out how this is done, or whether this is relevant to guitar amps.

Practically this means that  there will be good and bad examples of all brands of valve.

Eg, until recently I've had very good results with EH-12AX7s, however latest batches of these valves have not been so good in terms of noise, and speaking to our vendor there seemed to be a problem with all of the Russian valves with a spiral filament (which includes the Sovtek 12AX7LPS and the Tungsol 12AX7), which makes me thing there was a QC problem which affected all these valves. Hopefully this will be sorted out.

As a result we've switched to using the JJ-ECC802S, which seems a good valve. We've had less good results in the past with the standard JJ-ECC83s, both in terms of noise and reliability, although this again could have been down to a bad batch.

Thus whilst it is possible to generalize about various valve brands, variation within batches can have a significant effect on your experience of that valve.








Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: low noise 12AX7's
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2009, 11:42:14 AM »
we've switched to using the JJ-ECC802S, which seems a good valve.

That's my default, the red label ones.  In some amps I have the gold pin versions.

Dmoney

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3577
Re: low noise 12AX7's
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2009, 12:04:32 PM »
i usually use gold pin JJ's in V1 and PI and the standard ecc83s' in the elsewhere.

i went for gold pin JJ for PI, red label ones for V3 and V2 and a tung sol gol pin for V1
got some winged C 6550's also.

HTH AMPS

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5649
    • HTH AMPS
Re: low noise 12AX7's
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2009, 08:28:48 PM »
i usually use gold pin JJ's in V1 and PI and the standard ecc83s' in the elsewhere.

i went for gold pin JJ for PI, red label ones for V3 and V2 and a tung sol gol pin for V1
got some winged C 6550's also.

Winged-C- 6550s are great for br00talz.  I put some in my mate's 2204 and he's been gigging them solid for a couple of years now.

Elliot

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2418
Re: low noise 12AX7's
« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2009, 10:27:43 PM »
I have had great luck with New Sensor 'Mullard' branded 12AX7s available on American Ebay and the EL84s in this series are by far the current production best EL84s I have used.
BKPS: Milks, P90s, Apaches, Mississippi Queens, Mules, PG Blues, BG FP 50s, e.60s strat custom set

Alex

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2004
Re: low noise 12AX7's
« Reply #8 on: November 19, 2009, 06:49:40 PM »
The Sovtek 12x7WA (the A means lowest power) is very quiet and low noise. It is also quite undynamic and sterile, but with highgain you might not care about this too much.

On my 5150 I simply went with a low noise JJ in the end. I also have that JJ803S  somewhere in there (5 preamp tubes after all) or whatever it is called, that tube is thicker and more compressed.
Current BKPs: Miracle Man, Nailbomb, Juggernaut, VHII
Past BKPS: Holy Diver, Trilogy Suite, Sinner, Black Dog

Dmoney

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3577
Re: low noise 12AX7's
« Reply #9 on: November 19, 2009, 08:03:55 PM »
i had a reissue mullard in V1 when i got the amp.
it was microphonic, which i guess may have been cause during shipping.

I'm going to stick with the JJ's. I got a gold pins for the PI and V1 because I want them balanced.
the input gain stage is a parallel triode stage a la matchless lightning. so i want a nice low noise balanced 12AX7 in there.

Pete24v

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 295
Re: low noise 12AX7's
« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2009, 08:45:48 AM »
a friend of mine has just put these in his Fender Deville and they sound great, low noise and more open sounding than JJ's, not he cheapest though!!

http://www.techtubevalves.com/valves/e813cc.php

Elliot

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2418
Re: low noise 12AX7's
« Reply #11 on: November 20, 2009, 09:40:58 AM »
How does a gold pin lead to balance?  I thought all gold did was to prevent oxidisation in the connection - so you could leave the tube/plug in the socket without feat of damage to the contacts.

(this is a genuine question not a rhetorical one btw)
BKPS: Milks, P90s, Apaches, Mississippi Queens, Mules, PG Blues, BG FP 50s, e.60s strat custom set

hunter

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5262
    • http://www.myspace.com/christophjaeger
Re: low noise 12AX7's
« Reply #12 on: November 20, 2009, 09:42:04 AM »
a friend of mine has just put these in his Fender Deville and they sound great, low noise and more open sounding than JJ's, not he cheapest though!!

http://www.techtubevalves.com/valves/e813cc.php

Did he put them in all stages? That must be expensive.

I'd love to hear some feedback from someone who tried one of these in e.g. V1 of a highgainer..
Tweaker's Paradise - Player's nightmare.

Pete24v

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 295
Re: low noise 12AX7's
« Reply #13 on: November 20, 2009, 12:17:09 PM »
yeah, there are only 3 pre amp tubes in the Deville, V1, V2 and PI. And the amp already had fitted some sort of rubber shock absorber around V1 & V2 (my old blues deluxe had it too)

hunter

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5262
    • http://www.myspace.com/christophjaeger
Re: low noise 12AX7's
« Reply #14 on: November 20, 2009, 12:32:16 PM »
yeah, there are only 3 pre amp tubes in the Deville, V1, V2 and PI. And the amp already had fitted some sort of rubber shock absorber around V1 & V2 (my old blues deluxe had it too)

So the British tubes need a damping ring to not become microphonic, is that so?
Tweaker's Paradise - Player's nightmare.