No no no
Maple through neck
Now, lets assume its a good piece of maple. Its gonna have a prominent top end, but maple has an understated but superbly tight low end and chimey mid too, and its very stiff wood, it transmits all frequencies pretty well, and through necks all things being equal allow more low modes in the sound (or them to be stronger, rather), add to that the fact that you'll likely be forced to use thinner strings which will have more high modes and you probably have a guitar thats gonna have a deep but not prominent low end and lots of attack and definition.
The wings are mahogany. Wings on a through neck have a slight effect. Theres a common wisdom, which is really just a widespread assumption based on the fact that the most wood is in there, that the body wood has a dominant effect on tone - no. What matters most is whats in the course of the vibration of the strings, i.e. whats right under the strings, wood wise and structurally. The rest just adds some colour, and in a bolt on or set neck the most important thing is usually the neck - thats what has the single biggest effect, through resonant feedback, on how the strings vibrate, and so what the pickups hear. A set neck or bolt on that is very well made will behave similarly to a though, but most of the time theres a degree of decoupling between the neck and body (in a bolt on) or a degree of dampening from glue. In a through neck the neck dominates, and this neck is maple, but on the other hand, its a through neck, so theres no decoupling or dampening between the neck and body so youre going to hear stronger low modes that you normally would in a bolt on maple neck, for example.
Que the boards luthiers (save one, I'm certain, whom I learned this from (mostly, the rest being my own experimentation and physicsy sense)) disagreeing with me :lol:
