Username: Password:

Author Topic: Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o  (Read 4449 times)

Nadz1lla

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1465
    • Arcanum Plectra
Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o
« on: September 09, 2012, 11:48:48 PM »
Is there a point to these?

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S2Y6HH_VRklgueK0fnPuPMfi1pS2YCu6e2ARVOcaAb0/edit?pli=1

I mean if you want tube tone, you get a tube amp...or am I missing something?

I think they might be going for "sounds like a cranked tube at all volumes" kind of thing.

tekbow

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 613
Re: Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2012, 12:12:17 AM »
Have seen something similar, jet city has something like it. sceptical

Toe-Knee

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1162
    • DIY Audio
Re: Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2012, 12:18:12 AM »
These actually look really cool both visually and the idea.

Especially the tiny amount of heater current.

I've heard some clips of the jet city ones that were really impressive.

They were being used to add more gain though. Really got a stock jcm800 into modern metal territory without a boost using just two of the suckers.
Please visit and share my guitar gear & DIY Blog
http://WWW.BACKLINE.TK
Non Biased Guitar Forum
http://fret.boards.net

Dmoney

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3577
Re: Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2012, 08:54:42 AM »
Jet City's product is only a 12AX7 type preamp 'valve'. This is the first power valve I've seen, which makes it interesting, slightly.

The 12AX7 type things aren't new. Mesa used to use the Fetron in one of it's amps way back when. What annoys me about some the jargon surrounding things like this, is the emphasis on them being 'analog' devices. They aren't vacuum tubes, so they must be some kind of solid state device. That doesn't make them 'digital' though I guess the words 'solid state' would usually put most people off. Wattgrinder was a prime example of this... 'ok, honestly, this is what they are...' followed by what sounded like jibberish suggesting he'd found a "non-vacuum vacuum device" which wasn't solid state but wasn't in a vacuum.

I find these gizmos interesting, and they might sound ok, or at least be good as reliable spares for touring. I'd like to tear a few apart.

Frank

  • Guest
Re: Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2012, 11:06:30 AM »
Seems like a great way to convert any decent valve amp into a Valvestate.

TheyCallMeVolume

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1602
Re: Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o
« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2012, 02:54:25 PM »
Gotta admit, they look really cool.

richard

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 821
Re: Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o
« Reply #6 on: September 10, 2012, 06:48:26 PM »
If they work - great. Have a suspicion they don't.
PRS Bernie Marsden Abraxas set
PRS S2 Singlecut RY's
JV Strat  IT Bridge
Gibson SG JB bridge
Fender Mex Tele Thinline TV Jones Classics
Fender Bassbreaker 15
Yamaha THR 100 Dual
Quilter Aviator Cub

BigB

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1429
  • Let's rock !
Re: Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o
« Reply #7 on: September 10, 2012, 07:01:18 PM »
Seems like a great way to convert any decent valve amp into a Valvestate.

+1  :lol:
Have: Crawlers, BGF 50/52s, Mules, ABomb, RiffRaff
Had : Slowhands (n&m), Trilogy (b)

HTH AMPS

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5649
    • HTH AMPS
Re: Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o
« Reply #8 on: September 10, 2012, 07:52:52 PM »
Its easy to be a Luddite about this, but one day they will nail it and we'll all be chuffed to bits when we can have plugins that never wear out, go microphonic or cost a small fortune each - especially when they sound like Mullard ECC83s (we can wish, right?)

 PDT_003

richard

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 821
Re: Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o
« Reply #9 on: September 10, 2012, 08:35:38 PM »
No business makes a product that never wears out. As soon as everyone that wants one has bought one - no more business. I wonder what makes these things wear out ?
PRS Bernie Marsden Abraxas set
PRS S2 Singlecut RY's
JV Strat  IT Bridge
Gibson SG JB bridge
Fender Mex Tele Thinline TV Jones Classics
Fender Bassbreaker 15
Yamaha THR 100 Dual
Quilter Aviator Cub

MDV

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
  • If it sounds good it IS good
Re: Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o
« Reply #10 on: September 10, 2012, 09:31:06 PM »
I'm all for them working as advertised. Cant be a bad thing.

Will believe it when I hear it though.

MrBump

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3405
  • Essex! Home of the Brave!!!
    • This Is Essex
Re: Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o
« Reply #11 on: September 10, 2012, 09:33:02 PM »
Its easy to be a Luddite about this, but one day they will nail it and we'll all be chuffed to bits when we can have plugins that never wear out, go microphonic or cost a small fortune each - especially when they sound like Mullard ECC83s (we can wish, right?)

 PDT_003

I don't know.  I think that no matter how good stuff sounds (and lots of modelling stuff works brilliantly, and most of us would struggle to tell the difference from the amp that's being modelled), we would still cling to valves, analogue delays, germanium pedals.  And guitars...

 :D
BKPs Past and Present - Nailbombs, Mules, Blackguard Flat 50's, VHII's & Trilogy Suite with Neck & Bridge Baseplates!

Toe-Knee

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1162
    • DIY Audio
Re: Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o
« Reply #12 on: September 10, 2012, 09:36:47 PM »
This has just  made me realise that valves need kickass looking heatsinks!

I am definitely intrigued by these.
Please visit and share my guitar gear & DIY Blog
http://WWW.BACKLINE.TK
Non Biased Guitar Forum
http://fret.boards.net

jpfamps

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 767
    • http://www.jpfamps.com
Re: Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o
« Reply #13 on: September 10, 2012, 10:09:52 PM »
This has just  made me realise that valves need kickass looking heatsinks!

I am definitely intrigued by these.

These are quite cool.

http://www.pearl-hifi.com/03_Prod_Serv/Coolers/Coolers.html

jpfamps

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 767
    • http://www.jpfamps.com
Re: Solid State "Tubes"? 0_o
« Reply #14 on: September 10, 2012, 10:21:47 PM »
Look like interesting devices.

Certainly solid state pre-amp "valves" have been produced before (and not really set the world alight), but I've not seen a solid-state power "valve" before, although this of course could be due to ignorance on my behalf.

The filament current draw is intriguing, as is the maximum cathode/ heater voltage rating, as solid state devices (usually) don't have heaters.

The transfer characteristic of a MOSFET look not dissimilar to a power pentode/ beam tetrode, however there is no equivalent of the screen grid in a MOSFET, and the a key feature of these devices is that they seem to have a "screen grid". I can't think how this has been achieved, and will apply some thought to it.

It says it can take 800V on plate and screen and 50W dissipation, so the 6L6WS would have the potential to deliver much more power than a conventional 6L6, perhaps as much as 150W for a push pull pair.