Username: Password:

Author Topic: So, wireless systems again. Tone-suckers or true signal?  (Read 8566 times)

Telerocker

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 7433
Re: So, wireless systems again. Tone-suckers or true signal?
« Reply #15 on: November 09, 2013, 02:43:30 PM »
I prefer cables for maximum tone. I had a wireless system in the nineties (can't remember what brand), but it seem to eat some bass.
Mules, VHII, Crawler, MM's, IT's, BG50's.

Bob Gnarly

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 107
    • My tunes
Re: So, wireless systems again. Tone-suckers or true signal?
« Reply #16 on: November 09, 2013, 08:02:11 PM »
Another happy Line 6 G50 user here. I'd be interested in a blind test for those saying they prefer the sound of cables whilst playing with a band. I can't tell the difference.
Maybe my ears are painted on though.

Telerocker

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 7433
Re: So, wireless systems again. Tone-suckers or true signal?
« Reply #17 on: November 10, 2013, 12:19:29 AM »
Another happy Line 6 G50 user here. I'd be interested in a blind test for those saying they prefer the sound of cables whilst playing with a band. I can't tell the difference.
Maybe my ears are painted on though.

My preference is based on the early generation wireless systems. I haven't tried any the last 15 years. I'm sure they have improved. But I won't buy one as I like cables and I'm not running around that much anymore.
Mules, VHII, Crawler, MM's, IT's, BG50's.