Username: Password:

Author Topic: Pup for racer X tone  (Read 6771 times)

Tahoebrian5

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • BKPs:
Re: Pup for racer X tone
« Reply #15 on: October 01, 2015, 02:38:32 PM »
Well I just found a steal of a deal on a pain killer full set on reverb so I jumped on em. After reading the description, they do sound like the ticket, lots of pick attack and mids. Fingers crossed! Will report back.

I'll get a pic of that guitar for you guys. It might be a week or so before I'm back up to the studio though.

Tahoebrian5

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • BKPs:
Re: Pup for racer X tone
« Reply #16 on: October 01, 2015, 03:05:14 PM »
The pg guitar can be seen (and heard!)if you go to this Facebook page, then watch the children of the damned video. I think this is a public page so it should work.
https://www.facebook.com/Fortress1515

Kiichi

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2492
Re: Pup for racer X tone
« Reply #17 on: October 01, 2015, 03:20:54 PM »
A good deal on a Painkiller set is a great start I think, good you got that. Look into getting push pull pots though to have a series / parallel switch for the humbuckers. That should, as others noted, seriously help too.
BKPs in use: 10th set / RY set / Holy Diver b, Emerald n / Crawler bridge, Slowhand mid MQ neck/ Manhattan n
On the sidelines: Stockholm b / Suppermassive n, Mule n, AM set, IT mid

Tahoebrian5

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • BKPs:
Re: Pup for racer X tone
« Reply #18 on: October 01, 2015, 03:39:06 PM »
I'm interested in the parallel thing. Having a hard time finding any video  examples of what they sound like in parallel vs series. Got any go to vids?

darkbluemurder

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2246
Re: Pup for racer X tone
« Reply #19 on: October 02, 2015, 08:27:57 AM »
Second Heat isn't the best Racer X tone for me to be honest though ;)

I love the rhythm tones - they are so raw. The lead tones are a bit bitey indeed.

Kiichi

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2492
Re: Pup for racer X tone
« Reply #20 on: October 03, 2015, 11:53:48 PM »
I'm interested in the parallel thing. Having a hard time finding any video  examples of what they sound like in parallel vs series. Got any go to vids?
What it does is make it sound more like a single coil, which when Gilbert is involved is a good option to have. With a high output humbucker like the PK that should just be a great option to have. I do not have a video showcasing it with the PK, but I say definetly get it. Often holds up better than a split if you are not going for cleans with a comp.

If you were to go all out IŽd even say get a 3 way superswitch so that you can have the middle be an autosplit of bridge and neck, Petrucci style. Also a great SC sound, bit like a 2 or 4 on a strat.
BKPs in use: 10th set / RY set / Holy Diver b, Emerald n / Crawler bridge, Slowhand mid MQ neck/ Manhattan n
On the sidelines: Stockholm b / Suppermassive n, Mule n, AM set, IT mid

gwEm

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 7456
    • http://www.preromanbritain.com/gwem
Re: Pup for racer X tone
« Reply #21 on: October 05, 2015, 11:43:19 AM »
I love parallel wiring in the neck. All the guitars I use regularly on stage are wired like that permanently now.

As Kiichi says, it makes sound more like a single coil. Another key advantage of that wiring
is that it is hum cancelling.

I don't really like (full sized) serially wound neck humbuckers anymore live. I like their warm jazziness at home.. but on stage I find that position needs all the cut I can get.
« Last Edit: October 05, 2015, 11:59:24 AM by gwEm »
Quote from: AndyR
you wouldn't use the meat knife on crusty bread but, equally, the serrated knife and straight edge knife aren't going to go through raw meat as quickly