Username: Password:

Author Topic: Multi FX comparison  (Read 26328 times)

sambo

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4519
Multi FX comparison
« Reply #15 on: April 09, 2006, 05:54:11 PM »
ah cool thanks guys....

£58 isnt bad...

but i think the third one (FX update) is included in all the XT Live's now..... at least thats what i think i remember seeing somewhere....

but yer £58 is pretty good on the whole

EDIT: nick- just looked at a musicians friend price.... NO *&^^ing WAY!??!?!!!!!!!!

$400!!!!!

that works out at £222..... thats at LEAST 80 quid cheaper... and by soundcontrols price thats OVER £100 CHEAPER...

DAMN DAMN DAMN DAMN

indysmith

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4713
    • Soundcloud
Multi FX comparison
« Reply #16 on: April 09, 2006, 07:08:34 PM »
omg i don't believe they charge you for "unlocking" them. i'd just find a key generator :P on th'interweb
LOVING the Mules!

sambo

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4519
Multi FX comparison
« Reply #17 on: April 09, 2006, 07:10:38 PM »
lol i doubt its as simple as that  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Muttley

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 795
    • http://www.muttleyville.org
Multi FX comparison
« Reply #18 on: April 09, 2006, 07:17:11 PM »
Quote from: indysmith
omg i don't believe they charge you for "unlocking" them. i'd just find a key generator :P on th'interweb


That'd be hard (as well as illegal of course).  You need to unlock it via an account you setup with Line6 when you buy them.

It's hardly a big deal TBH.  I mean, £58 is just one average night out after all.  ;)

Muttley

sambo

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4519
Multi FX comparison
« Reply #19 on: April 09, 2006, 07:35:00 PM »
lol!.... i wish my average night out was 58 quid.... haha

yeah but it isnt that big a deal.... if they;re good then the price isnt that important

Elliot

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2418
Multi FX comparison
« Reply #20 on: April 09, 2006, 08:12:16 PM »
I have all the packs on my Guitarport (and the XT pack) - they are not that bad - in all I would say the Metal one is the least useful because the modelling between say the Line 6 insane and the Soldano on the POD and the Diezel and the Engl on the Metal pack doesn't really sound that different (to my folkie ears at least).  The Classic amps has some great sounds on it and the FX pack (which is included in XT Live) has some crazy stuff on it too.
BKPS: Milks, P90s, Apaches, Mississippi Queens, Mules, PG Blues, BG FP 50s, e.60s strat custom set

badgermark

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
  • Mm-hai!
Multi FX comparison
« Reply #21 on: April 09, 2006, 08:19:27 PM »
Quote from: sambo
'badgermark' (what kind of a name is that anyway)-

couldnt you just shut the hell up???

its a new thread because its a new topic- if someones looking for a comparison of the units, theyre not gonna look in say the "wish me luck" thread are they?



i put badgermark as my name cos my name is mark, and the badger bit was something my friends added before my name, as there is 2 marks in our social group. though im getting sick of it, its better than nothing i suppose.

oh ooooh oh! faa faa faa fa faa faa fa faaaaaa
Mississippi Queens, Holydiver.

indysmith

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4713
    • Soundcloud
Multi FX comparison
« Reply #22 on: April 09, 2006, 08:26:03 PM »
ROFLMFAO
LOVING the Mules!

_tom_

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 8842
Multi FX comparison
« Reply #23 on: April 09, 2006, 08:42:55 PM »
Quote from: badgermark


i only said it cos there is so many topics, and they are all about the same thing. so stop being a little ####!!flap.


HAHAHA! PWNT sambo!  :lol:  :lol:

sambo

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4519
Multi FX comparison
« Reply #24 on: April 09, 2006, 10:36:58 PM »
theres only like 2 threads on the topic of multi-fx... but theyre not a direct comparison of the two units....

do i need to spell it out even more?

and does it really bother you that much?

P.S- get over it? get over yourself mate- its not like i actually give a shite about the nickname your boyfriends give you....

why badger anyway? do you live in a hole and smell like shite or something?

_tom_

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 8842
Multi FX comparison
« Reply #25 on: April 09, 2006, 10:41:55 PM »
Dont get offensive. These forums are nice  :)

schmendict

  • Guest
Multi FX comparison
« Reply #26 on: April 09, 2006, 10:50:03 PM »
Quote from: sambo
why badger anyway? do you live in a hole and smell like shitee or something?


HAHAHAHA.

Seriously though, Line6 are extortionate, ive got the Rifftracker, i thought i was entitled to the packs for free!
How wrong i was...

sambo

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4519
Multi FX comparison
« Reply #27 on: April 09, 2006, 10:51:40 PM »
they are a bit extortionate lol.... at least the XT live's come with the FX pack included....

dave_mc

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 9796
Multi FX comparison
« Reply #28 on: April 09, 2006, 11:01:47 PM »
wow, people are starting to get touchy...  :o

anyway, my two cents is (i've said it before and i'll say it again) that you have to try out everything (or at least as much as possible) in the one place, head to head, with the same guitar.

Unless something totally sucks so much that it's blatantly obvious, (with me at least) if something is even half-decent, i'll think it's better than it is, unless i get to compare it to something better.

even if an engl, or a laney, or whatever is out of your price range (if the guys in the shop will let you) try them out too, to see if they're worth saving up for, over the line 6, or whatever else you're looking at...

sambo

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4519
Multi FX comparison
« Reply #29 on: April 09, 2006, 11:04:11 PM »
cool thanks for the advice dave mate