Bare Knuckle Pickups Forum
Forum Ringside => Pickups => Topic started by: CommonCourtesy on November 01, 2013, 01:25:31 PM
-
Hey guys, looking for some help and advice here.
I have a Gibson Les Paul Studio which I deploy in drop c tuning, and play post-hardcore/alternative rock, so lots of chugging, power chords on the bottom 3 strings and big guitars!
Looking to upgrade my stock bridge humbucker, and i have been looking at Nailbomb and the Aftermath in particular.
I want aggressive mids and that low end that will shake the floor, and the tightness of the chugs locking in with the kick drum.
I'm also hoping to get a Peavey 6505+ soon which will help.
The kinda bands that are similar to what I play and for reference are:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXSBvgOl0iM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXSBvgOl0iM)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7Z7kUBJ2hY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7Z7kUBJ2hY)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJHlnrRqUg0 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJHlnrRqUg0)
Which pickup do i go for?
Any recommendations appreciated!!
-
Regarding mids and fat and chunky chuggs I'd say either Alnico Nailbomb, Painkiller, Alnico Warpig.
If you want your chuggs to remain fat but with a little bit less mid emphasis the Miracle Man or the C-Bomb would do the job as well.
Just my first thoughts, I'm sure someone else will chime in soon :)
Cheers
-
Thanks for the reply,
Been talking to a mate and he recommended the Aftermath, he uses a Nailbomb though cos they're more metal than us.
Also the BK guys recommended an Aftermath too, what's the difference between an Alnico and Ceramic? And what one should i go for?
-
the Aftermath bridge is ceramic only. The neck is alnico only.
Cheers Stephan
-
Oh ok cool, you can get open and closed humbucker designs though? Closed ones have a higher output apparently but open has more clarity.
-
Alnico Blackhawk or alnico Nailbomb.
I hope your band doesn't use that horrid vocal effect used on that first clip! The guitar on the second clip might be closer to an Aftermath. I would think a Blackhawk would cover the middle ground between an A-bomb and an Aftermath. I don't think a Warpig would be a good choice for these styles, or at least not the alnico version (which I have, and sounds very Sabbathy in C# standard).
As far as I know all humbuckers are available closed or open except the Blackhawks, which are only open due to their 'blade' pole piece design
-
Definitely the black hawk for me. It will nail those brutal but polished modern metal tones.
It will make your nuts shake with massive bottom end and its very very tight.
I'd get the ceramic magnet to be safe but the alnico might work well too I just get nervous around low tunings not really my thing these days.
I dropped tuned one of my guitars with an alnico nailbomb in the other day to play some mastodon riffs like blood and thunder/the czar and I proper didnt like it.......might just be me though.
For this application I wouldnt even consider the nailbomb definitely black hawk, aftermath or even the juggernaught or maybe even the painkiller.
If I had to play in that low thing id definitely go for a painkiller but I have different tastes I guess I really wouldnt play that kinda stuff but can appreciate the tone of the riffs.
-
Alnico Blackhawk or alnico Nailbomb.
I hope your band doesn't use that horrid vocal effect used on that first clip! The guitar on the second clip might be closer to an Aftermath. I would think a Blackhawk would cover the middle ground between an A-bomb and an Aftermath. I don't think a Warpig would be a good choice for these styles, or at least not the alnico version (which I have, and sounds very Sabbathy in C# standard).
As far as I know all humbuckers are available closed or open except the Blackhawks, which are only open due to their 'blade' pole piece design
'horrid vocal effect'? What do you mean by this lol.
I know Lee Malia (Bring Me The Horizon's guitarist) uses a Warpig bridge pickup in his Les Paul standard but he tunes down to drop Bb and C standard, way lower than we do!
The Aftermath seems to be the popular choice but I can't help but be tempted by the Nailbomb, essentially we're not a metal band though.
-
Definitely the black hawk for me. It will nail those brutal but polished modern metal tones.
It will make your nuts shake with massive bottom end and its very very tight.
I'd get the ceramic magnet to be safe but the alnico might work well too I just get nervous around low tunings not really my thing these days.
I dropped tuned one of my guitars with an alnico nailbomb in the other day to play some mastodon riffs like blood and thunder/the czar and I proper didnt like it.......might just be me though.
For this application I wouldnt even consider the nailbomb definitely black hawk, aftermath or even the juggernaught or maybe even the painkiller.
If I had to play in that low thing id definitely go for a painkiller but I have different tastes I guess I really wouldnt play that kinda stuff but can appreciate the tone of the riffs.
Not considered the Black hawk! As mentioned above I don't want a fizzy metal tone, more of a metalcore or post-hardcore brutal rhythm chugging sound. Something that'll make people go "phwooaarr!" Haha.
Most of my work involves 5th chords on the bottom 3 strings, chugging and squealies!
Ceramic i've read is the better one as its more punchy. But then an Aftermath only has ceramic anyway for a humbucker.
-
'horrid vocal effect'? What do you mean by this lol.
The pitch-shifting effect or 'auto-tune' - you can't hear it? It's to make people who can't sing sound kind of like they can sing. The only vocal effect that I hate more is the warbly vocoder robot vocal thing, which only Roger Troutman ever managed to make sound even remotely cool. There's a good reason why people seem to prefer the instrumental version of the Periphery album ...
Anyway, you probably hate the vocals of the punk, thrash, and grindcore stuff I listen to! One of my all-time favourite vocalists is Dean Jones from Extreme Noise Terror and Raw Noise, who basically bellows! It's an honest bellow though, and he always combines it with cliched punk fist-pumping, so it fits. ;)
I think there's a good chance you will be happy with either Nailbomb option. The alnico one is more middy, but a Les Paul has enough mahogany to tame that a bit, and it might give you that hardcore edge you seem to be looking for. The A-Bomb is the most hardcore sounding pickup in the BKP range I've heard, especially in an SG, and it retains something of that in a Les Paul but more toned-down and versatile. Do you like Sepultura at all? The A-Bomb has that kind of character, more or less pronounced depending on what you put it in.
There is a return policy with BKPs and if you live in the UK that is a realistic option.
-
This the ADTR link for the song "Dead and Buried?" Its all recording and production lol they can play live, honest!
What's an 'A-Bomb'? Is that a name of another pickup in the series?
I'm undecided between a Nailbomb or an Aftermath at the moment. I think the 3 youtube links i've posted gives you a good idea of the kinda sound i want. And i've detailed i plan to get an 6505+ head and use a LP studio in drop c!
We play more melodic sort of pop/punk/metalcore/post-hardcore whatever you want to call it. So i need my chords to sing out and the chugs to proper thunder out of the amp!
Sustain too on ringouts cos sometimes we finish songs on open string ringouts so i need it to scream!
-
Hm, I think one of the ceramic high ouput pickups would do better. Maybe the ceramic Nailbomb?
-
What's an 'A-Bomb'? Is that a name of another pickup in the series?
That's forum talk for 'alnico Nailbomb'. C-Bomb is 'ceramic Nailbomb'
There's also A-Pig and C-Pig for the two Warpig bridges, and A-Hawk and C-Hawk for the two Black Hawk options. The Black Hawk isn't mentioned as much on the board, but it could be a good option for you.
I tend to agree with Alex that the ceramic options are a safer bet. You might like the alnico versions, but you might hate them too. I found the low mids of the A-Bomb very difficult to dial out when I didn't want them for certain styles. The C-Bomb will have enough of that character but be more versatile.
-
Definitely the black hawk for me. It will nail those brutal but polished modern metal tones.
It will make your nuts shake with massive bottom end and its very very tight.
I'd get the ceramic magnet to be safe but the alnico might work well too I just get nervous around low tunings not really my thing these days.
I dropped tuned one of my guitars with an alnico nailbomb in the other day to play some mastodon riffs like blood and thunder/the czar and I proper didnt like it.......might just be me though.
For this application I wouldnt even consider the nailbomb definitely black hawk, aftermath or even the juggernaught or maybe even the painkiller.
If I had to play in that low thing id definitely go for a painkiller but I have different tastes I guess I really wouldnt play that kinda stuff but can appreciate the tone of the riffs.
Not considered the Black hawk! As mentioned above I don't want a fizzy metal tone, more of a metalcore or post-hardcore brutal rhythm chugging sound. Something that'll make people go "phwooaarr!" Haha.
Most of my work involves 5th chords on the bottom 3 strings, chugging and squealies!
Ceramic i've read is the better one as its more punchy. But then an Aftermath only has ceramic anyway for a humbucker.
Well im still thinking a ceramic black hawk set would be ideal but between the aftermath and the nailbomb I really think the aftermath will be more your thing but if youre really set on a nailbomb get one but id stick to ceramic pickups for this.
-
What's an 'A-Bomb'? Is that a name of another pickup in the series?
That's forum talk for 'alnico Nailbomb'. C-Bomb is 'ceramic Nailbomb'
There's also A-Pig and C-Pig for the two Warpig bridges, and A-Hawk and C-Hawk for the two Black Hawk options. The Black Hawk isn't mentioned as much on the board, but it could be a good option for you.
I tend to agree with Alex that the ceramic options are a safer bet. You might like the alnico versions, but you might hate them too. I found the low mids of the A-Bomb very difficult to dial out when I didn't want them for certain styles. The C-Bomb will have enough of that character but be more versatile.
Ah i see, i'm a newbie to all this forum terminology haha.
Warpig is too metally i'd suspect, i don't need a death metal tone, something with clarity.
Its either the Aftermath or Nailbomb i think, wish i could try a Blackhawk without installing it and then deciding i don't like it and sending it back, and all that hassle.
-
Definitely the black hawk for me. It will nail those brutal but polished modern metal tones.
It will make your nuts shake with massive bottom end and its very very tight.
I'd get the ceramic magnet to be safe but the alnico might work well too I just get nervous around low tunings not really my thing these days.
I dropped tuned one of my guitars with an alnico nailbomb in the other day to play some mastodon riffs like blood and thunder/the czar and I proper didnt like it.......might just be me though.
For this application I wouldnt even consider the nailbomb definitely black hawk, aftermath or even the juggernaught or maybe even the painkiller.
If I had to play in that low thing id definitely go for a painkiller but I have different tastes I guess I really wouldnt play that kinda stuff but can appreciate the tone of the riffs.
Not considered the Black hawk! As mentioned above I don't want a fizzy metal tone, more of a metalcore or post-hardcore brutal rhythm chugging sound. Something that'll make people go "phwooaarr!" Haha.
Most of my work involves 5th chords on the bottom 3 strings, chugging and squealies!
Ceramic i've read is the better one as its more punchy. But then an Aftermath only has ceramic anyway for a humbucker.
Well im still thinking a ceramic black hawk set would be ideal but between the aftermath and the nailbomb I really think the aftermath will be more your thing but if youre really set on a nailbomb get one but id stick to ceramic pickups for this.
Aftermath ceramic was first choice i think. Alnico Nailbomb backup option perhaps?
-
My first thought was an A-Bomb but when you mentioned that huge bottom end it made me think again as the A-Bomb has a lot of high mids and they tend to be the dominant aspect of the pickup. I've never tried an Aftermath myself so I'm wary of commenting. I'm surprised the Juggernaut hasn't been mentioned more as I suspect that would give you the middle ground you need between Aftermath and A-Bomb.
-
My first thought was an A-Bomb but when you mentioned that huge bottom end it made me think again as the A-Bomb has a lot of high mids and they tend to be the dominant aspect of the pickup.
not really, in my experience
I actually sold it cause it had far less upper mids than I was expecting
considerably less than both the holy diver and aftermath in the same guitar (the '73 lp custom in my avatar)
it had a lot of treble edge, lot of bass and low mids, but the center and upper mids felt quite flat
the aftermath suggestion sounds right at first, and will work for the stuff on the clips, but it's not I'd call a low end heavy pup
nailbomb and cold sweat had a lot more chug on the lower string
the aftermath has a more in your face response, but not the same depth
perhaps the painkiller might have more bass response, but I only tried it in a brazilian mahogany 7 string ibanez RG, so I can't make a direct comparison
from clips in les pauls, I wouldn't expect the PK to be much different from the aftermath, except that it sounds hairier and less "contained", but I'd take that over the aftermath in this case
the juggernaut seems to be a great option for a lot of people
still skeptical about its tone chart, but I might try it (not so) soon
the concept of having an underwound hybrid aftermath is amazing
-
I agree that the Painkiller Les Paul clips make it sound like a great choice for this application.
-
My first thought was an A-Bomb but when you mentioned that huge bottom end it made me think again as the A-Bomb has a lot of high mids and they tend to be the dominant aspect of the pickup.
not really, in my experience
I actually sold it cause it had far less upper mids than I was expecting
considerably less than both the holy diver and aftermath in the same guitar (the '73 lp custom in my avatar)
it had a lot of treble edge, lot of bass and low mids, but the center and upper mids felt quite flat
This is why I find it so difficult to assess the A-Bomb! In my guitar the bottom end was swamped by aggressive, tight, bright hairiness so whenever I think of it, I never think of it having a bottom end at all. Your comment is actually particularly interesting for something I'm currently considering but I'll elaborate on that in my own thread rather than hog this one.
-
My first thought was an A-Bomb but when you mentioned that huge bottom end it made me think again as the A-Bomb has a lot of high mids and they tend to be the dominant aspect of the pickup.
not really, in my experience
I actually sold it cause it had far less upper mids than I was expecting
considerably less than both the holy diver and aftermath in the same guitar (the '73 lp custom in my avatar)
it had a lot of treble edge, lot of bass and low mids, but the center and upper mids felt quite flat
This is why I find it so difficult to assess the A-Bomb! In my guitar the bottom end was swamped by aggressive, tight, bright hairiness so whenever I think of it, I never think of it having a bottom end at all. Your comment is actually particularly interesting for something I'm currently considering but I'll elaborate on that in my own thread rather than hog this one.
well, it was indeed all that, but quite bassy and not upper mid heavy
I even had to back it down quite a bit to tame the bass and output
most of the other pups I had in this guitar were set very close to strings
I was kinda disappointed cause I was expecting something like the holy diver, but with more aggressive upper mids
got more aggression than I actually wanted, but not the upper mids
probably should have gone with the rebel yell
replaced it with a mcp afwayu at the time, which had a fuller midrange, but it was even bassier and not as organic
my guitar is quite bass heavy, but the midrangy models like the diver, aftermath and black dog showed a more controlled low end (in amount of bass, not tightness) than the nailbomb, cold sweat or even the riff raff (mine has a thicker magnet, so it's probably a little bassier than usual)
the aftermath always felt like it was missing something in the low E string (actually tuned to Eb or C#), compared to the cold sweat and nailbomb, specially on non-muted single notes and heavy sliding riffs
the diver and dog had way less output and volume, but they sounded a little fuller and deeper, despite of having almost the same overall voicing (MIDS everywhere)
if you didn't like the nailbomb for particular guitar, it still might work for a different one
I had completely different experiences with the holy diver and cold sweat simply going between different gibson models (which changes mostly shape/size and top)
I didn't enjoy the NB in that particular les paul, but I'd probably love it in the '78 greco lp std I had, or maybe in the PRS CE-22 I had
or maybe even in my SG (that sounded amazing with VHII's, by the way)
-
This screams for a Juggernaugt ! I heard Misha Mansoor said it's kind of a compromise between the Black Hawks and the Aftermath (in terms of sound, not of output).
I'd say it's very broad sounding - much more than my holydiver in any case. The squealed harmonics scream. Oh yeah they do. And the bottom end is huge.
But hey, I have it on a superstrat guitar - maybe it would't go with you Les Paul.
-
I could install Aftermaths on my main guitar which is a les paul studio, i have an Epi les paul that i use as a backup that has a stock pickup, alnico something. Could stick a Nailbomb in that although i'd get a different sound. The Epi actually has a bit more sustain possibly cos of the heavier wood, but the Gibson is better to play, if i can install a better bridge pickup to make it scream i'll be happy!
Not focusing on bass frequencies too much, mids is important as i think guitar is always a mid instrument, but low end is still essential for this style, its not metal don't forget, so doesn't have that scooped mid tone, its just aggressive and chunky sounding.
-
*UPDATE*
So i've decided to put an Aftermath in the main guitar which is the LP studio and a Nailbomb in the back up which is an Epiphone LP standard. The backup has thinner strings (10-52's) so i thought a Nailbomb would give it a bit more beef.
Also installing Earvana nuts on both and an aluminium hard tail bridge piece, as apparently this increases the top end brightness. Will see how these go, I can always swap pickups around and stuff, but very excited to complete the work and hear how it sounds!
Thanks to everyone who's contributed and suggested recommendations.
-
Got my guitars back yesterday with the BK Aftermath and Nailbomb (alnico) installed.
Fook me both sound like a beast and now i get the gnarly bark, instead of a whimper with these pickups. The output is very very high and the amount of sustain on ring out chords is something else! Definitely worth the money and effort, i did find the Nailbomb in the Epi Les Paul Std sounds more zingy and brighter. Possibly due to lighter strings (10-52). Aftermath in the main guitar sounds very very beefy, and more low end and throaty.
Can't wait to air these live in a venue!
-
Great! Welcome to the BKP family ;)
-
Cheers! Played my first show last night with them teamed up with my newly purchased 6505+ head. Sounds brutal!
Only snag is a bit of feedback when doing stop/start riffing, so i had to control this by muting strings and stuff, really tricky. I whacked up the threshold on the ISP decimator i had to get but it only serves to kill sustain on certain parts of my playing.
Really annoying, do i have to put another suppressor now after my guitar?
-
I doubt it. The cause of the feedback is most likely in your guitar or your hands. Are you sure it's not just harmonics? Use both hands to mute if you want it completely quiet. If the feedback happens when you are near the amp rather than far away, then the issue is in the guitar. Check that there isn't some kind of ringing harmonic generated by that new tailpiece. Put some foam under the pickups to reduce vibrations of the pickup in the cavity. Some foam has reduced feedback from my Warpigs. I still get feedback from my Stockholm but I haven't put foam under that, and it also has a lot of single-coil hum that I might try to reduce in various ways, and just try to cut down on general environmental noise with some shielding
That said it is the Stockholm that blows my friend's minds when they hear it, despite the hum
-
I don't think its the harmonics, i'm pretty good at muting the strings cleanly. I did notice several times when i took my hands off the strings it would start squealing, but when i started playing a riff which had a rest in it there was slightly feedback.
I faced my speaker when i had both hands on and it was completely quiet with the volume turned all the way up.
When you mean under the pickup do you mean before the saddles or the actual inside?
Can't seem to find the sweet spot on the ISP to cut out the pre-amp noise AND any feedback from the pickup.
-
When you mean under the pickup do you mean before the saddles or the actual inside?
Can't seem to find the sweet spot on the ISP to cut out the pre-amp noise AND any feedback from the pickup.
Inside. Under the actual pickup. Just unscrew the pickups next time you change strings and put a piece of that thin foam that came in the bottom your BKP box under each pickup, making sure you don't obstruct the legs too much. It's just to dampen vibration, which can cause some feedback.
The ISP will only cut out preamp and pedal noise. It won't cut out feedback. Keep it around 11.30 or so on the dial, where you first had it. It only reduces a bit when you wind it up because it's killing everything. You have to locate the source of the problem.
If the problem is a ringing harmonic behind the bridge or between the nut and the tuners you can wedge some of the thicker foam from the box in there under the strings, that will act like someone muting the strings there. When you mute normally it only affects the length of string between the nut and the bridge saddles. Apparently on some guitars you can get it on other parts of the string. But if you can control it by muting the played length of the string I kind of doubt that's your issue
-
Funny enough I played again last night, and tried to control feedback by muting with both hands, 9/10 it worked and i think i may have it under control, however for say, the start of songs when i have the dirty channel kicked on sometimes it will squeal.
The threshold knob was on 11 o'clock all night. And i also took the gain down to 5 on the pre-amp. It was on 6 before. I backed off the gain on tubescreamer which seemed to reduce feedback.
I also noticed on the wireless receiver the signal light to detect there's audio coming from the guitar kept flashing red several times, whatever that means.
I prefer not to be messing about with foam and stuff, just hassle for me and knowing me i'll probably mess it up!
-
I have NO gain on the tubescreamer. Level boosted all the way up, tone where you want it (around 10 o'clock for me).
Around 5-6 on the lead channel pre gain.
If I want additional gain for a solo or something I kick in the MXR CAE Boost pedal, which I have ahead of the screamer (I actually use an MXR Custom Badass Modified O.D. these days, but I can get TS-9 or TS-808 sounds out of it depending on whether the bump is on or off).
I find this works for me.
With gain through the pedals - and especially if I used a 'distortion' pedal at all! - I got uncontrollable feedback when riffing. I can get controlled feedback when I kick in the boost, the rest of the time the overdrive is tightening up the base a little and boosting the preamp for more controllable gain.
-
The gain is the one on the left isn't it? That's all the way down. The one on the right is on 10 o'clock, with the tone in the middle.
We have songs with a lot of stop start chugging riffing and the majority of the time it was clean stops, just at the end of the songs where the stop is dead on the beat, there needs to be complete silence. If i can i'll turn the volume knob on the guitar down to zero or click off the dirty channel.
-
Don't be afraid to dime the level. Then reduce it on your amp if you need to.
I can't remember which knob is on which side but I think the level is on the right. The one on the right is either called 'gain' or 'drive'. Back that right off.
I like my pre gain on 6 on the lead channel with the screamer set as above. Like I said I can use the boost pedal when I want more gain, but for riffing that's too much. The Peavey preamps produce heaps of gain!!
-
Drive is on the left, which is at zero. Level is about 10 o'clock.
I find the tubescreamer tightens up the bass end and makes squealies scream a bit more. I've tried playing with and without it on the overdrive channel and it loses that thud i reckon.