Author Topic: Analog vs Digital recorders (Read 3873 times)

Ian Price · « **on:** March 15, 2008, 12:29:27 AM »

I'm stuck on what recording gear to go for. I used to have a computer interface but sold it as I didn't use it too much - I now want to start recording again but can't decide what to go for. Does anyone on here use any old analog reel to reel recording equipment? If so how do you get on with it, what have you got etc etc etc?

I will proably get something analog as I don't really want to have/need to have too many options on editing - would rather just get a nice tone and record!

maverickf1jockey · « **Reply #1 on:** March 15, 2008, 12:13:33 PM »

with reel to reel tape you'll probably have to restore the machine and set up the heads in the correct way. Unless you can find some really great bargain and nab yourself at least an 8-track recorder there is no way you'll get studio quality bar having a decent mixer and an excellent sound man.
as for editing you will need to do it at some point so try and get a splicing bay.
Digital has none of these troubles but it just isn't tape...

PhilKing · « **Reply #2 on:** March 15, 2008, 04:23:08 PM »

I have a ton of analog gear, but just set up a digital studio with Sonar because it is easier to edit and use. If you want a good analog deck try to find a tascam midistudio 688 or a 388 (though they weigh a ton!).

kevincurtis · « **Reply #3 on:** March 17, 2008, 10:33:13 AM »

I had a Revox C278 which was a great machine, but in this day and age, for simplicity in recording and mixing, digital is the best way IMHO. If you want to get a more 'analogue feel' get a tube pre-amp to go through.

MrBump · « **Reply #4 on:** March 17, 2008, 12:22:22 PM »

DAW all the way for me - you just can't beat the ease of use. Although it can be a real pain getting everything "just right"...