Username: Password:

Author Topic: Band recording with Nailbomb and CS  (Read 3667 times)

waves

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 187
Band recording with Nailbomb and CS
« on: March 20, 2008, 10:42:47 PM »
http://www.myspace.com/adapttosurvive

Ok so my band recorded some stuff in the christmas hols and i've just got round to doing the mixing.

It was a steep learning curve for us all being 17 and with no experience so we just experimented - fun! Oh and then my amp broke days before we were set to go in.

Sooo, don't pay much attention to the tone (its a demonizer through a £50 crate power block through my h&k vc412.)

But its bare knuckle pickupss in my ibanez s and i thought it would be some fresh music for your critical ears. Thanks x

Lazy_McDoesnothing

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 426
  • wi, usa
Band recording with Nailbomb and CS
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2008, 12:44:37 AM »
First off I have to say, nice playing!  The instruments sounded good to me too.  Everytime I try to record it sounds horrible.

Only thing I didn't really like was the vocals.  Especially on Infernal Existance.  I'm sorry but...they were not good.  Not saying I could do better since I'm amazingly bad, but If I could change anything it would be the voc's.

Keep it up, cheers!

waves

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 187
Band recording with Nailbomb and CS
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2008, 12:55:17 AM »
Yeah people keep mentioning how they dont like the singing lol its starting to worry me. Oh well. Thanks for the compliments though man :)

Scotty477

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 750
Band recording with Nailbomb and CS
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2008, 01:11:35 AM »
I like the songs and the playing and tone are very nice indeed.

The vocals could be stronger yeah but perhaps a bit of professional tuition could work wonders here - as well as more production on the vocals?

I'm first and foremost a guitarist but I did sing in a band for a year, doing live work. It took me a while to get used to learning to breath properly and project correctly but it does help. I would have loved to have taken singing tuition.

When we did get in a 'real' vocalist (who was vastly better than me) I was amazed at just how much he utilises breathing techniques and projection to do his stuff. As good as he is, he has taken singing tuition in the past, so don't think I'm putting your singer down by suggesting tuition please  :D

Anyway, keep it up. The fun is in the doing it and you will only get more experienced as you go along.

noodleplugerine

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3869
Band recording with Nailbomb and CS
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2008, 01:38:40 AM »
I think its more the production than the singer himself.

He's sat on top of the bandmix a bit too much - I know NOTHING about recording - But it does seem that the singer and the band are very much seperate in the recordings.
My last FM.
ESP Horizon NTII.
ESP Viper Camo.
ENGL Screamer.

opprobrium_9

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 994
Band recording with Nailbomb and CS
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2008, 04:37:47 AM »
The production on the instruments sounds pretty professional and the playing is real tight, which are the strongest points about the whole thing.

However, as has been mentioned the vocals, ahh the vocals.  I got halfway through "final picture" before i had to turn it off.  The vocals are really bad i have to say.  The screams are very weak and sound really amateur and the clean singing is really just a painful experience to say the least.  I have tried to tone down my criticisms here, i really have.

The other thing that contributes to the problem of the whole though definitely has to be some of the riffs.  Obviously this comes down to personal preference in the end, and i'll tell you the preference sure ain't mine.  However, with my objective side i would say that the kind of stuff you guys are playing has droned through the music world far too much for this to be "fresh" enough for a serious or even casual listening experience - we are wandering in, what i would say is, cliché territory... then again one could say this of many bands, and I damn sure would :wink: so it's nothing personal.

But namely we are here to discuss tone first and foremost.  The good news is YOU NAILED IT!  So be happy about that.  And, honestly, go on playing whatever the $%&# you like because my opinion probably isn't worth shitee in the brand of music you play  :P
BKPz: Nailbomb+VHII, more to come...

waves

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 187
Band recording with Nailbomb and CS
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2008, 08:38:19 AM »
Quote from: noodleplugerine
the singer and the band are very much seperate in the recordings.


i hear this aswell. does anyone have any knowledge or tips of how to make them sit better in the mix? as i said it was a completely ameteur effort and i knew nothing went i went in.

opprobrium_9

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 994
Band recording with Nailbomb and CS
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2008, 11:44:05 AM »
Quote from: waves
Quote from: noodleplugerine
the singer and the band are very much seperate in the recordings.


i hear this aswell. does anyone have any knowledge or tips of how to make them sit better in the mix? as i said it was a completely ameteur effort and i knew nothing went i went in.


There are several things you can do:

Solution 1 - EQ the vocal track to meld better with the instruments.  The vocal range lies in between roughly 200-350 Hz to 16 kHz.  This is the general model one should work with.  However, i will tell you right now, you will be doing very little to the vocal EQ before the 750-800 Hz mark.

100 and below - not really part of the natural vocal range, but it is important to roll this back because this effects plosives (the "pop" from b's and p's, d's and t's, etc), and you really don't want to be dealing with those unless you are obnoxious and don't care :wink:

200-350 Hz to give the vocals more low end and will "full out" a treble-heavy vocal track.  It is unlikely you will need to use this as this is just for serious doctoring purposes.

500-800 Hz this one will give a lot more "body" to the vocal track, just beef it up really, especially if it is too trebly.

800-1.5 kHz is where most of the good stuff is happening audibly such as the beginnings of the note and speech definition.  Do here as you will.

1.5-3 kHz more note definition and clarity for the voice exists here, do as you will.

3-7 kHz this can be dangerous territory and gold both at the same time.  First the gold: around the 3-4 kHz area you will get very sharp and cutting note and speech definition, use with caution but it is really essential.  This could be conflicting with a scooped upper mids guitar frequencies especially important for metal.  The 4-5 kHz range is really tiring on the ears so too much can make anything sound nasally, and especially with the guitar it becomes problematic.  So i would adjust accordingly to the guitar.  You can cut the 3 kHz range if you want to "cover up" out of tune vocals - something you should take into consideration :wink:  The other thing that exists in the 3-7 kHz range is sibilance (the s "pop" sound, this is what the pop filter is for), just note how much there is and adjust accordingly but don't adjust so you will lose all the work you have done - if there is too much the vox might have to be re-recorded with more processing in real time.

8-16 kHz i am not really gonna walk through eight more kHz of frequency stuff.  So, what you must remember about these frequencies is that the cymbals exist here and if you don't work with the EQ right you can really compromise the cymbal sounds.  I will say that this range, if boosted, will add considerable clarity to everything - a nice "chimy" clarity i like to think - but use with caution.  This range also constitutes the flesh and blood of distorted signals, too much and your whole track will distort.

Remember too that with any post production you are compromised by whatever threshold devices and other sonic modifiers were used in the studio.  Also remember that a 1 dB boost or cut IS A LOT!  Normally one shouldn't go above 3 dB, but sometimes things require extreme measures, i have personally done more than 3 dB boosts in places required.  It also does come down to just hearing it too, just screw around with the EQ and see what happens.  The EQ is by no means the end-all-be-all of problem solvers, it is a tool like anything else and can only do so much.

Solution 2 - Put the vox lower in the mix, this means lower the dB rating on the vocal track, that is, assuming you still have the tracks individually.  Lower it until it naturally "melts in" with the other instruments, this comes down to one's ear and no other real tips can't be given in this department.

Solution 3 - Listen and fvck around!  You could actually get something good without really knowing what you did.  Make sure you can walk back through your steps though as you should be able to recreate the same process.
BKPz: Nailbomb+VHII, more to come...

Scotty477

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 750
Band recording with Nailbomb and CS
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2008, 04:05:02 PM »
Wow

That was perhaps the most in depth explanation of recording vocals that I've ever read.

I dofeth my cap to you   :D

lifted

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 281
Band recording with Nailbomb and CS
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2008, 06:23:51 PM »
Quote from: Machinehead
Wow

That was perhaps the most in depth explanation of recording vocals that I've ever read.

I dofeth my cap to you   :D

  I second that dofeth,    and great job with the TONE  waves,  Cheers
Irish Tour/ Mule Set,    Apache Set... in Strats .... Nailbomb Bridge,Cold Sweat Neck in Ibanez S540