Username: Password:

Author Topic: Messing with vintage guitars  (Read 3204 times)

AndyR

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4715
  • Where's all the top end gone?
    • My Offerings
Messing with vintage guitars
« Reply #15 on: April 13, 2008, 12:28:19 PM »
That's exactly what I was doing when I modded my Squier! Trying to get a different sound on the cheap... I'd been a strat player fronting a 3-piece for years. Then I was fronting a 4-piece where we added a "lead" guitarist so that I could concentrate on front-man duties.

We were playing blues-country-pop-rock originals (think Tom Petty raised in Devon and living in Surrey!). The tele seemed the way to go initially - an electric I could strum like an accoustic, and I found this Squier real cheap 2nd hand. It was great.

So we had me on a tele, and the other guy on a strat. I started feeling we needed to warm the sound up a bit, and I thought "Keef Richards has a neck humbucker... that's the answer". So I got the chisel out, etc, etc...

The neck sounded great - a bit like a humbucking guitar! - and the bridge sounded great, but no way of using them in the same song (or at the time, even in the same gig! - being frontman, I couldn't keep running to the backline and fiddling).

We reached the conclusion that I ought to be playing a Gibson type guitar in this band, I acquired some Epi's second hand, and I never really used the Squier again!

Sounds like you're the same as me - a "fender" player wanting to move in to "gibson" territory as well. It also sounds like you've got another problem now though (reading the other thread as well) - you're after a nice warm humbucking tone, but falling for a PRS with soapbars in. It might be that the P90 sound is what you're actually after, but it also might be that that particular PRS is one of "your guitars" (ie you pick it up and it's "the one") and it's distracting you from the humbucker quest. Both routes are probably right, but, it's expensive to follow both!

(I really thought I had all this solved a year or two ago with a Line6 Variax, which does do what it says on the tin, but we've bought another 3 guitars and three sets of BKPs since then!)
Play or Download AndyR Music at http://www.alonetone.com/andyr

PhilKing

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3655
Messing with vintage guitars
« Reply #16 on: April 14, 2008, 12:37:54 PM »
Having lots of vintage guitars I would tell you that if it is original and you like it basically, then  leave it alone.  All of mine that are modified (usually just replacement pickups anyway), were missing the original parts when I got them.  If you still want to do it, then get an after market body that is already cut and swap the parts (then you can put yours back one day and sell on the other - or get a new neck for it!).

If you want a neck humbucker for a tele, then look at a mini-humbucker, they work great and march the bridge pickup realy well.
So many pickups, so little time

badgermark

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
  • Mm-hai!
Messing with vintage guitars
« Reply #17 on: April 14, 2008, 12:46:28 PM »
Could always get a MIM tele and whap a humbucker in the neck and a beefy single in the bridge. The MIMs come with a humbucker route (at least the newer ones do) and are pretty cheap.
Mississippi Queens, Holydiver.

Roobubba

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2786
Messing with vintage guitars
« Reply #18 on: April 14, 2008, 01:28:02 PM »
Quote from: Philly Q

Agreed, never hurts to have an extra Tele (or two).  



Ewww I feel dirty just reading those words :(

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Messing with vintage guitars
« Reply #19 on: April 14, 2008, 01:58:58 PM »
Quote from: Roobubba
Quote from: Philly Q

Agreed, never hurts to have an extra Tele (or two).  


Ewww I feel dirty just reading those words :(

You've been very subtle with your occasional hints, Roo, but I'm starting to get an inkling that maybe you don't like Teles.
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

Roobubba

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2786
Messing with vintage guitars
« Reply #20 on: April 14, 2008, 02:26:52 PM »
Why? Who could possibly not like that sleek, refined and completely not deviant-esque body shape?

:)

Zaned

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 497
Messing with vintage guitars
« Reply #21 on: April 14, 2008, 04:55:28 PM »
Well, if you just replace the pickup without doing any routing to the body / pickguard, the guitar can be returned to its original form.

You said you want a humbucker tone on the bridge? Well, then the only way to go would be something like this: http://www.seymourduncan.com/products/electric/telecaster/cutting-edge/little_59_for_t/

It sounds like a humbucker, not like a single coil.

On the other hand, if you just want to remove the single coil noise, I can recommend Kinman pickups. Without hesitation. I had Kinman's woodstock regular set in a strat that I've since sold to my father, and they were just great. Their slogan "vintage tone without the noise" actually holds water :)

I know this is a BKP forum, but I don't think BKP has a product that would suit the purposes here. Correct me if I'm wrong!

-Zaned
Paths are for followers.