It's one and the same point Philly.
You can't say you don't like Hiphop if you're totally ignorant of what it is.
And claiming that all hiphop sounds the same - Is exactly that.
Sorry, but noo. Because in saying that he doesn't like Hip hop, it is understood that he doesn't like what it represents to him, how it has shown itself to him, relating to his experiences with it, and more likely the mainstream parts of it.
Your statement kind of says "you couldn't be a vegetarian, you haven't seen how many different ways there are to eat meat / kill the aminal / different types of meat there are (depending on their reasons)" - You can't tell someone that they must eat meat because they haven't experienced all aspects of it
Its interpretation people...
+1. It's like me saying that I don't like mass murderers. Basically I don't like any of them and I don't even want to know what methods they use to kill! A bit extreme but I can totally understand what Johnny is saying.
It's not quite like that.
The conversion doesn't quite work, with murder how you do it makes no difference in terms of practical morality, but motive makes a huge difference. In music the same sort of thing doesn't quite apply. Truth of the matter is that it is foolish to claim to despise something which you have never heard, and as nobody has heard all music, it is foolish to claim that you hate a genre unless you have heard every example of the said genre.
That's the argument here. You can claim that you hate all examples of a given genre which you have heard, but to pass judgement on the rest of the genre isn't quite right. I thought I hated hardcore, and now I almost only listen to hardcore, since i have found the right bands.
Most people think they hate classical music, and its all boring nonsense, yadda yadda yadda, but then they go to see La Clamenza di Tito, and they're transformed into fanatics.