Username: Password:

Author Topic: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)  (Read 30909 times)

sambo

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4519
Re: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)
« Reply #60 on: September 27, 2008, 04:20:05 PM »
^Yep- rosewood for the natural. But I much prefer the purple- looks awesome!

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)
« Reply #61 on: September 27, 2008, 04:31:20 PM »
OK, looks like the voters are preferring rosewood for the natural...

But definitely having a single-coil in the neck!
« Last Edit: September 27, 2008, 04:33:18 PM by Philly Q »
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

Ian Price

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4571
Re: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)
« Reply #62 on: September 27, 2008, 05:56:54 PM »
Philly - how much did the body and neck cost for the purple one? I couldn't see the prices on line for some reason!
I think I hate being indecisive.

38thBeatle

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6098
    • http://www.myspace.com/alteregoukband
Re: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)
« Reply #63 on: September 27, 2008, 06:08:53 PM »
Definately the natural with Rosewood I would say.
Send three and fourpence we're going to a dance
BKP's: Apache, Country Boy, Slowhands.

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)
« Reply #64 on: September 27, 2008, 07:02:47 PM »
Philly - how much did the body and neck cost for the purple one? I couldn't see the prices on line for some reason!

That body was $399, the natural one was $340 (they're both swamp ash, but the purple is one-piece).  Shipping was about $85 combined.  Then VAT and import duty of course!  In total the two bodies cost me about £580 - more than I was intending to spend (of course  :roll: ), but I've sold 3 guitars in the last few weeks so I'm not feeling too guilty.

The neck is a Fender Highway 1 which I got from eBay, but finished Warmoth Strat necks start at about $250 (then, of course, go up depending on the woods etc).  I haven't decided whether to get another Fender neck or a Warmoth one for the natural body.
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

Ian Price

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4571
Re: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)
« Reply #65 on: September 27, 2008, 07:07:50 PM »
Cheers Philly - just considering my options to fill my current strat GAS. I'm slowly coming to realise that I'm a fender man at heart. I do love the look and sound of others, and have owned 335s, LPs, PRSs, but for some reason have never got on with them.
I think I hate being indecisive.

HTH AMPS

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5649
    • HTH AMPS
Re: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)
« Reply #66 on: September 27, 2008, 11:27:38 PM »


I like the second one, the maple board just matches with the natural body better. 

Rosewood boards on natural guitars and maple boards on black guitars is just wrong (urgh!).

I'd also go with a SSS set, probably something in SRV territory to suit that look - Irish Tours perhaps?

Ian Price

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4571
Re: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)
« Reply #67 on: September 27, 2008, 11:37:19 PM »
I like the second one, the maple board just matches with the natural body better. 

? From where I'm sitting the 2nd one has the rosewood board. I'm pretty sure I'm not drunk!
I think I hate being indecisive.

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)
« Reply #68 on: September 27, 2008, 11:46:39 PM »
Rosewood boards on natural guitars and maple boards on black guitars is just wrong (urgh!).

Even Gilmour's Black Strat?  No, I much prefer maple boards on black guitars - unless the headstock is black too.

(Edit: Oh yeah, at least one of these Strats will be getting Irish Tours - in neck and middle positions, if not all three)
« Last Edit: September 27, 2008, 11:52:34 PM by Philly Q »
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

AndyR

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4715
  • Where's all the top end gone?
    • My Offerings
Re: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)
« Reply #69 on: September 28, 2008, 11:12:06 AM »
Looking good Philly.

Purple one's cute - probably looks better than the pic, I'm guessing.

Natural is looking better than I was expecting - for me natural strat bodies are either "oh yeah!!" or "I see what you were getting at, um...". But, on these pics, it falls into the first category :D

I'm coming down on the side of support for the rosewood board (and preferably the smaller headstock - is that the actual neck under consideration?) and I want to see a red tortoiseshell guard on it like that with cream knobs and covers.

On the HSS versus SSS - it's up to you, but I'd go for the 70s/HSS look on the purple. Then, if ITs are one of the things you're going for, I'd definitely put the ITs, SSS, on the natural. Then I'd want a decent rhythm section (what are Chris Layton and Tommy Shannon doing nowadays, anyway?) and I'd be off :D
Play or Download AndyR Music at http://www.alonetone.com/andyr

PhilKing

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3655
Re: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)
« Reply #70 on: September 28, 2008, 11:58:27 AM »
The purple looks great, for the natural I think a rosewood neck with a CBS headstock would be magic, but I don't know if you have that neck and so the second would have to be my choice (if you don't have the neck and end up getting a Warmoth one, then I might be tempted to get an ebony fingerboard with a goncalo alves neck!).
So many pickups, so little time

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)
« Reply #71 on: September 28, 2008, 12:00:33 PM »
 :D Cheers Andy!  Several very good points there, so rather than quoting your whole post:

1. Yes, the purple body looks much better in the flesh - it goes from a deep rose pink colour in the middle to actual purple on the edges, with the grain showing through even on the darkest parts.  None of which shows in the pics!  In fact on my computer here in work it looks almost black.  :?

2. The natural body looks absolutely mind-boggling!  That's just a clear finish, no tinting or filler to enhance the grain.  I've always loved the look of ash Strats, but the 2 and 3 piece bodies always seem to have really obvious, ugly joins.   This one is centre joined and the grain matches beautifully, in fact I think the two pieces are bookmatched.

3. Rosewood board is getting increasingly likely, but that's not the actual neck I'd be using.  I'd prefer another big CBS headstock, but although it's dead easy to get a nice maple H1 neck, they don't use such nice rosewood on the H1s as on the more upmarket Fenders (especially Deluxes).... 

3.5. .....Which leads me back to Warmoth, which also means small headstock (they do CBS, but it looks rubbish without the big Fender logo).  If I get a Warmoth neck, I may go for a kingwood or pau ferro fingerboard - I think the lighter colour would look nice with the body.

4. Tortoise (brown rather than red) and cream/aged white parts are a certainty - I tried lots of scratchplates (I have piles of old ones at home) and torty looked best.  I don't have an SSS torty scratchplate, but since I'm throwing all this money around I might as well just get one and keep my options open.  :lol:

5. I called Tommy and Chris - they seem up for it but I didn't think they realise what a shiteeeee guitar player "that little English guy" actually is yet (I keep telling them I'm Welsh, but they just don't get it :roll:).
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)
« Reply #72 on: September 28, 2008, 12:02:57 PM »
The purple looks great, for the natural I think a rosewood neck with a CBS headstock would be magic, but I don't know if you have that neck and so the second would have to be my choice (if you don't have the neck and end up getting a Warmoth one, then I might be tempted to get an ebony fingerboard with a goncalo alves neck!).

 :D Thanks Phil, saw your post just after I replied to Andy's.  As I mentioned, I'm considering kingwood or pau ferro if I can't find a nice Fender neck.  You have a kingwood board or two, don't you?
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

PhilKing

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3655
Re: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)
« Reply #73 on: September 28, 2008, 12:18:27 PM »
Hi Philly, I have Kingwood and Pau Ferro from Warmoth and the kingwood is really stunning, the attached pics don't do it justice.  If you want the big Fender Logo's, you can get them on ebay or from Glen Ellard [artyfarty1@blueyonder.co.uk], I only have a pic of a tele logo but the strats are just as good.
So many pickups, so little time

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: Strat bodies - how light is too light? (Update!)
« Reply #74 on: September 28, 2008, 12:56:01 PM »
Hi Philly, I have Kingwood and Pau Ferro from Warmoth and the kingwood is really stunning, the attached pics don't do it justice.  If you want the big Fender Logo's, you can get them on ebay or from Glen Ellard [artyfarty1@blueyonder.co.uk], I only have a pic of a tele logo but the strats are just as good.

Thanks Phil, the kingwood does look really good... and the Warmoth showcase has kingwood boards on my preferred neck shapes, '59 roundback or SRV... 

Does he also do the "transition" logo?  I'd go for that I was getting a small headstock.  Then again I don't want to get too period-correct, this'll be a modern 22-fretter as usual. 
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM