Username: Password:

Author Topic: NAD - 2204  (Read 7108 times)

hamfist

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1341
NAD - 2204
« on: October 04, 2008, 10:43:18 AM »
Well, I'd been patiently waiting for about 7 weeks when it finally arrived - my new Ceriatone JCM800 2204 clone.
  Extras are an FX loop and a PPIMV (as well as the standard pre-PI MV).

As usual from Ceriatone, the amp was packed superbly.

As usual, the build quality of the chassis, and soldering was superb.

As usual, the cab was merely OK, cheap, light, and bit of cracked ply if you look inside (but I'm not complaining, as they charge so little for the cab - it'll surely last for years, if I look after it, anyway).




It sounded unmistakably JCM800 as soon, as I plugged it in. Comparing it to a 1978 Marshall 2204 I owned earlier this year, I like the Ceriatone better. it's just tighter, less bright and with much, much less background noise - it really is a very quiet amp, even at full gain.

  Being a tinkerer, I had the beast open on the first day, and have been tweaking and modding the thing. I knew to start with that I like a much fuller, less bright tone than 800's standardly have.  With a few simple mods, the amp is now a chunky, beefy rock monster. Basically, I've added mids and bass, whilst cutting the harsh bright treble that 800's are famous/infamous for.  It still sounds unmistakably like a JCM800, but just nicer !

 I'll get round to doing some clips at some point, hopefully soon - just need to get my sh1t together !

The FX loop seems to play very well with my DD-20, even though the loop is not buffered at all. I certainly can't hear any tone loss using it.

I've found that the PPIMV is pretty useless with this circuit. It just makes the tone very harsh and bright when you use it (caused by the reduction in negative feedback as you turn down a PPIMV). The standard 800's pre-PIMV sounds much better.

 I'll keep the PPIMV installed though, as it doesn't seem to add noise, and I'll just leave it on full.   It'll be handy to have installed if I ever change the circuit to 1987 (50W plexi) spec.

So altogether I'm very pleased, and as I seem to be playing 70's/80's classic rock mostly these days, it fits me very well.

I still need to sort out what pedals I'm going to boost it with. My trusty Blue Boy Deluxe does a good job of upping up the gain to get a very full, saturated rhythm tone when I need it, but I'm still searching for a pedal to get those singing lead lines.

I'm thinking tube screamer, or tube-screamer-like pedal. Any suggestions ?

Edit - OK, got round to doing a soundclip. It's through a Marshall 412, with greenbacks. The Back in Black clip is the pre-amp dimed, the other bit is with it on about 8. Master is on about 0.5 - only just on really. I think this amp will be astounding when I get to open it up properly !!
 Here's the clip - http://www.box.net/shared/static/tazlev9ma4.wav .  (sorry its a wav - just sounds better than the mp3 conversion I did)
 
« Last Edit: October 04, 2008, 04:25:47 PM by hamfist »

hamfist

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1341
Re: NAD - 2204
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2008, 12:33:23 PM »
Soundclip now added to original post.

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: NAD - 2204
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2008, 01:57:03 PM »
Sounds nice!

sgmypod

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3765
  • Truly bad since 1972
Re: NAD - 2204
« Reply #3 on: October 04, 2008, 02:23:58 PM »
Nice
Autotune My Arse

Crawler,nailbomb & Ltd Ed Emeralds, apache, now riff raff..EX- N/bomb, IT, Mquee

dave_mc

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 9796
Re: NAD - 2204
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2008, 04:46:11 PM »
excellent, those ceriatones have a very good rep. :)

PhilKing

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3655
Re: NAD - 2204
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2008, 04:48:13 PM »
Sounds good, very like my Silver Jubilee (not really too much of a surprise I suppose!)
So many pickups, so little time

MrBump

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3405
  • Essex! Home of the Brave!!!
    • This Is Essex
Re: NAD - 2204
« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2008, 04:50:03 PM »
Just to pervert the thread a little, how are you finding the Laney 2x12?
BKPs Past and Present - Nailbombs, Mules, Blackguard Flat 50's, VHII's & Trilogy Suite with Neck & Bridge Baseplates!

Crazy_Joe

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3940
Re: NAD - 2204
« Reply #7 on: October 04, 2008, 05:28:33 PM »
Looks awesome!
Black Dogs

Previous BKP's: Riff Raff, Holy Divers, Painkillers, C. Warpig, Nailbomb, Miracle Man.

FernandoDuarte

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3978
Re: NAD - 2204
« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2008, 06:05:13 PM »
Sounds good, do you have a link of the modification you've done? :D

opprobrium_9

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 994
Re: NAD - 2204
« Reply #9 on: October 04, 2008, 06:16:12 PM »
Sounds Awesome!!!  Has a some nice open Bass Frequencies! :D  I am sure you could play some kick ass downtuned stuff on that!
BKPz: Nailbomb+VHII, more to come...

_tom_

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 8842
Re: NAD - 2204
« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2008, 06:25:05 PM »
Sounds a bit fizzy, probably the low volume though. I bet it sounds good in the room when its a bit louder :)

hamfist

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1341
Re: NAD - 2204
« Reply #11 on: October 04, 2008, 10:28:15 PM »
Just to pervert the thread a little, how are you finding the Laney 2x12?

The is good, but I have Scumback H75's in it now. THe 70/80's it came with are really not nice speakers IMO. Anyone buying this cab would be losing out on a lot if they didn't upgrade the speakers IMO.

hamfist

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1341
Re: NAD - 2204
« Reply #12 on: October 04, 2008, 10:29:32 PM »
Sounds good, do you have a link of the modification you've done? :D

Sure thing Fernando.

The mods were :-

- treble peaking circuit between low gain input and pre-amp gain dial replaced with a 68K resistor.(reduces treble)

- 10K resistor placed between the grounded tab of the mids pot and ground (more mids available)

- Bypassed V2a cathode resitor (820 ohm) with a 0.68 uF cap (more plexi-like mids)

- put a 0.0033 uF cap between the 4 ohm tap on the output selector and the negative feedback resistor (100K) (increases bass response)

- put a 330pF cap across the 68K input resistor of V1a (tweaks the mids a bit - in a nice way to my ear)

The Ceriatone 2204's come without a brite cap on the pre-amp gain pot. If there had been one, I would have removed it.

hamfist

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1341
Re: NAD - 2204
« Reply #13 on: October 04, 2008, 10:32:39 PM »
Sounds a bit fizzy, probably the low volume though. I bet it sounds good in the room when its a bit louder :)

I agree Tom, it is a bit fizzy, although I think that "fizz" would help it cut through with a band to a certain extent. In one way, I think that it's also part of the signature sound of a 800.
    I think it would definately get a bit "fuller" at a decent volume.   I daren't get this above 0.5 in the house though.    I've borrowed a friend's Hotplate this evening though, so it will be interesting to see what difference that makes.

horsehead

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1633
  • because the horsehead says so...
    • http://www.myspace.com/horseheadgary
Re: NAD - 2204
« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2008, 08:49:45 AM »
Glad some one asked about the 2 x 12". How does the amp sound through the laney? or are you running it through marshall?
"Praising Phil X for his enthusiasm seems a bit like praising Hitler for his ambition"