Username: Password:

Author Topic: Strats - anyone else not like them?  (Read 60350 times)

_tom_

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 8842
Re: Strats - anyone else not like them?
« Reply #180 on: November 07, 2008, 06:01:19 PM »
V is actually really comfy, which I found weird.

Crazy_Joe

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3940
Re: Strats - anyone else not like them?
« Reply #181 on: November 07, 2008, 06:16:23 PM »
Strange, will have to try it.

What's the opinions on the Lite Ash strat?
It has awesome specs and is a good price, comes in a great colour scheme (all black with all maple neck). Though i heard the quality was a bit hit and miss.
Black Dogs

Previous BKP's: Riff Raff, Holy Divers, Painkillers, C. Warpig, Nailbomb, Miracle Man.

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: Strats - anyone else not like them?
« Reply #182 on: November 07, 2008, 06:49:05 PM »
V is actually really comfy, which I found weird.

It's very much a personal thing though - I find a V really uncomfortable, unless it's a very "soft" V like the Baja Tele (which is really more like a U shape, IMO).

As usual, try before you buy.

The Lite Ash is great for the price, and the build quality seems pretty consistent from the few I've seen - Korean QC is usually good, isn't it?  Good pickups too (oops, I said something positive about Seymour Duncan, I'll get struck by lightning... ).  I'm just not keen on some of the cosmetic details - the abalone inlays and just a "Fender" logo on the headstock (no "Stratocaster").
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

_tom_

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 8842
Re: Strats - anyone else not like them?
« Reply #183 on: November 07, 2008, 06:51:53 PM »
I have no idea what kind of v the neck I bought off phil king had. It was a MIM '57 style I think. Would've been a great neck if I could get on with the 7.25" radius :(

FernandoDuarte

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3978
Re: Strats - anyone else not like them?
« Reply #184 on: November 07, 2008, 06:57:27 PM »
Looks like i want a C shape, V looks weird, i'll try one out though when i go to try some strats out.

I only know the Fender Eric Clapton signature has V neck, but I'm sure that has more guitars with it...

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: Strats - anyone else not like them?
« Reply #185 on: November 07, 2008, 07:19:48 PM »
Yeah, the '50s reissues and the '50s Classic Player have a "harder" (less rounded, more pointed) V shape than the Baja Tele.  I had a Jimmie Vaughan Signature which was also quite a hard V.  I've never tried a Clapton Strat but I believe it's a slightly softer, less bulky V and a bit shallower at the nut (a lot of V necks are pretty much the same depth for the whole length of the neck). 

It's not so much the V shape of the back that bothers me, it's the shape of the "shoulder" where the neck meets the fingerboard.  I prefer a more rounded shape like a Gibson '59.  The Fender C is a bit too slim, but still OK for me.
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

Crazy_Joe

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3940
Re: Strats - anyone else not like them?
« Reply #186 on: November 07, 2008, 07:25:40 PM »
The 50's Classic Player will be perfect for me as long as i get on with the neck. The specs look promising and it has the all maple neck.
Black Dogs

Previous BKP's: Riff Raff, Holy Divers, Painkillers, C. Warpig, Nailbomb, Miracle Man.

tomjackson

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
Re: Strats - anyone else not like them?
« Reply #187 on: November 07, 2008, 09:43:17 PM »
I really like the way Strats - anyone else not like them? has turned into a finer discussion on the relative advantages of various Stratocaster neck profiles :)


Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: Strats - anyone else not like them?
« Reply #188 on: November 07, 2008, 10:11:16 PM »
I really like the way Strats - anyone else not like them? has turned into a finer discussion on the relative advantages of various Stratocaster neck profiles :)

Yeah, we've bored the haters into submission...

Hopefully.
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

PhilKing

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3655
Re: Strats - anyone else not like them?
« Reply #189 on: November 07, 2008, 10:53:40 PM »
My 57 has the hardest V neck I ever played (John Elliott at Bravewood also said it was the sharpest V he had seen).  However it is really comfortable but a bit thin at the nut.  The story on V-Necks is that the original guy who had been making necks was suddenly taken ill or something and they put a new guy on the job and he didn't really know what he was doing.  By the time anyone noticed, he has made a lot of them and so they decided to keep the shape!  If this is true, mine might have been one of the first he made!!

However, I have a 1917 Washburn Acoustic which has a V-Neck and my Martin 000-28 also has a V shape, so V-necks have been around a long time.  The reissue V is softer than the originals, and the Warmoth Clapton shape is very comfy (I have that shape on one of my tele necks).
So many pickups, so little time

FernandoDuarte

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3978
Re: Strats - anyone else not like them?
« Reply #190 on: November 07, 2008, 11:54:25 PM »
The story on V-Necks is that the original guy who had been making necks was suddenly taken ill or something and they put a new guy on the job and he didn't really know what he was doing.  By the time anyone noticed, he has made a lot of them and so they decided to keep the shape!  If this is true, mine might have been one of the first he made!!

:lol:

WezV

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5838
    • http://wezvenables.co.uk
Re: Strats - anyone else not like them?
« Reply #191 on: November 07, 2008, 11:55:27 PM »
i think V might just be one of those shapes you would easily slip into if you were carving necks by hand all day... as a job, rather than a guitar player or luthier. i know V-shapes work, but i wouldnt ever have dreamt of doing one before trying one as guitar necks should clearly be a bit rounder!!! (not sure why, but thats what i was told to think at some point)  Its one of those things that has to occur because some guy in a factory wants to take his break a bit sooner ;)

they do feel great and phil's 57 V neck was particularly nice but it had that great worn in feel that really helps.. i would have liked to play it attached to a body to see how i got on with it.. but i did take measurements so may just try one at some point!

Ted 'N' Leo

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 670
Re: Strats - anyone else not like them?
« Reply #192 on: November 08, 2008, 03:23:14 PM »
I have a 1917 Washburn Acoustic which has a V-Neck...

God damn you.

Good story on the V neck by the way. I generally think that the best things in life tend to happen by accident.
Driving in my car, smoking my cigar, the only time i'm happys when i'm playing my guitar!

AndyG

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Strats - anyone else not like them?
« Reply #193 on: November 11, 2008, 03:52:09 PM »
I've probably owned, briefly, a dozen or so of the things and just can't get on with them at all; I hate the trem, the volume control gets in the way and I can't get them to sound anything other than weedy and thin. Teles, on the other hand-especially the Highway 1-I like a lot.
Life is not measured by how many breaths you take but by those moments which take your breath away.

Doctor X

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 130
Re: Strats - anyone else not like them?
« Reply #194 on: November 11, 2008, 05:10:34 PM »
what does the volume control get in the way of?
Gibson '58 VOS - PG Blues, Gibson SG Special - MQ's