Username: Password:

Author Topic: More Mule Mayhem!!  (Read 6110 times)

Tusko

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 37
More Mule Mayhem!!
« on: April 23, 2005, 01:44:15 PM »
Hey all,

I cannot begin to express how perfect The Mule is for my sound, so I thought I`d record a clip of some off the cuff riffs....please excuse the quality, its just done with the inbuilt mic of my MP3 recorder, but I think it gets the point across pretty well  :twisted:

Amp and guitar wise: it`s just plug n play...Schecter C7 with Mule bridge pu only into an Orange Rockerverb 100 head.

The sound may be a bit ropey but you gotta love the tone!!

Love any feeback as to peoples opinions...
- " The Power Of The Riff Compels Me..."

nuntius

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 236
More Mule Mayhem!!
« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2005, 05:45:05 PM »
Sounds cool man, but could you maybe cut the length of the track so you repost it in a higher bitrate?

64kbps is quite low quality

From what I can tell though, it sounds great

HJM

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2330
More Mule Mayhem!!
« Reply #2 on: April 23, 2005, 06:22:01 PM »
Quote from: nuntius
Sounds cool man, but could you maybe cut the length of the track so you repost it in a higher bitrate?

64kbps is quite low quality

From what I can tell though, it sounds great


Or is that how the MP3 player records??
Apache,VHII,Emerald,Nailbomb,MiracleMan,StormyMonday,BlackDog,Trilogy,Mothersmilk,Sultans+Sinner

Peterku

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
More Mule Mayhem!!
« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2005, 07:04:19 PM »
It's an interesting thing that even if the quality's low, the Mule's open top end shines through. It's the same openness I hear on Tim and HJM's Mule clip. Cool. :)

nuntius

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 236
More Mule Mayhem!!
« Reply #4 on: April 23, 2005, 07:45:23 PM »
Quote from: HJM
Quote from: nuntius
Sounds cool man, but could you maybe cut the length of the track so you repost it in a higher bitrate?

64kbps is quite low quality

From what I can tell though, it sounds great


Or is that how the MP3 player records??


Dunno..  

Actually looking at the size of the file, you could probably get it to 128kbps without editing, and still be under 2mb.

Tusko

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 37
More Mule Mayhem!!
« Reply #5 on: April 23, 2005, 10:31:07 PM »
The Mp3 recorder actually records at about 64 kps, and also to a .wav file...so I had to convert it.

Simply chopping the file and changing the bitrate would not improve the quality as 64 kps is the only setting for it, it was just a rough idea. Please scuse the `hum` in the backgroud as that is the PC fan!!

I`ll record something @ better quality soon as and post it.
- " The Power Of The Riff Compels Me..."

Leafy-dono

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 23
More Mule Mayhem!!
« Reply #6 on: June 04, 2005, 08:36:08 AM »
Woah, through an Orange, it sounds really Stoner Rock-ish!
Horrible low-quality his, but yes, it does get the point across.
(Then again, what other people own an Orange/Matamp :wink:)
Now I've pretty much made up my mind for my next Les Paul project.
Mule in the bridge, Stormy Monday in the neck.

By the way, what are you tuning to? It sounds really low, it sounds like C to me, if I had to guess without any tonal referance, am I right?
"Don't work for the man, if you can get down with Rock'n'Rol'e"

maliciousteve

  • Guest
More Mule Mayhem!!
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2005, 10:30:15 AM »
he's using a seven string dude.

Sounds very cool.

Leafy-dono

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 23
More Mule Mayhem!!
« Reply #8 on: June 04, 2005, 10:33:34 AM »
Quote from: maliciousteve
he's using a seven string dude.

Sounds very cool.


Ah, ok, cool! I missed the 'Schechter C7' Part. Missed a clear note about 7 strings.
"Don't work for the man, if you can get down with Rock'n'Rol'e"