Username: Password:

Author Topic: Pedal problem  (Read 9384 times)

Bradock PI

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 336
Re: Pedal problem
« Reply #15 on: May 15, 2009, 02:23:04 AM »
Yup if you are using your amp for distort instead of a pedal that can go after the chorus I believe it dont work well

You probably need something that does this job

http://www.ceriatone.com/Manuals/ceriatone%20klein-ulator%20manual%20072508.pdf

This device buffers the signal to the pedals so they see instrument level then feeds it back at line level, one of these would allow any standard pedals to be placed in the effects loop.

I was surprised when I looked to not find many of these!


hamfist

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1341
Re: Pedal problem
« Reply #16 on: May 15, 2009, 07:19:51 AM »
Isn't there an issue with putting time based effects in front of the amp, especially if I'm using preamp gain? Other than that, what on earth do I use for Delay, Chorus, Phaser and Flanger that will work in a loop like mine. All I know of is rack effects or a DD-20. Alternatively, which such effects would certainly work up front? I certainly use the gain channels on my amp if that's relevant.

If you use pre-amp distortion from your amp, you are absolutley right that one of your options is to get modulation and delay pedals that will work at line level in your loop. It will sound bad having delay especially before distortion.
  The dumble-ator (or Ceriatone's version the Kleinulator) is an option to get your FX loop down to instrument level. But I'll bet my life savings that using one that way would introduce a lot of hum/background noise, as the unit would have to boost the signal a lot again before it went back into the amp, to give the amp the right signal strength that it is looking for. You'd have so many gain stages in your whole pre-amp/ loop structure that the background noise would probably be unacceptable.
  Just for the record, I bought a Ceriatone Kleinulator once, and found it very noisy. Although I have heard other reports of them being good.

Another option for you, is to replace you amp's gain by a pedal(s). That way, you can have all you pedals in front of the amp (at instrument level), and play into the clean channel of your amp. This works really well if you can find dirt pedals that you really like, and is usually good for low levels of background noise.

Last option is to go the modelling route and do everything in one unit, and then plug into the FX loop return of your amp.

All are potentially good and bad options, depending on your personal tastes and what you choose to get. I've built up great rigs using all of those techniques.

Doadman

  • Guest
Re: Pedal problem
« Reply #17 on: May 15, 2009, 07:51:14 PM »
I've learned quite a bit through this, it's just a pity that I learned it right after I bought all these pedals and built my own pedal board! The problem appears to be the fact that the effects loop is set for line level power rather than instrument level. I can't fathom why pedal manufacturers don't take account of this when they produce time based effects! This wouldn't be a problem if I restricted myself to the clean channel as they could all then easily go in front of the amp but I also like to use the amps own gain channels. That being the case, it seems I have three main options on how to proceed and I'd be grateful for the thoughts of all you guys who know a lot more than me:

1) Buy time based pedals that WILL work at line level. The question is, what are the options as the only one I know of is the Boss DD-20?

2) Put something like a Ceriatone Kleinulator in the loop to get the power to the right level (is there something similar to this that will do the same thing but is easier and cheaper to get hold of?). My concern with this is that it would introduce a lot of hum/background noise, as the unit would have to boost the signal a lot again before it went back into the amp, to give the amp the right signal strength that it is looking for. I'd have so many gain stages in the whole pre-amp/ loop structure that the background noise would probably be unacceptable.

3) Give up on the whole individual pedal route, sell the lot and buy an RP1000

I'd be very grateful for anyones thoughts and advice.

hamfist

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1341
Re: Pedal problem
« Reply #18 on: May 15, 2009, 09:45:16 PM »
I think I've already given my opinion on most of what you ask, but other options to a DD-20 are the TC Electronics Nova series (delay and Moulation), and the Eventide Timefactor (don't even go there - mega expensive !)

There may well be others.

Bradock PI

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 336
Re: Pedal problem
« Reply #19 on: May 15, 2009, 10:34:03 PM »
There are amps that allow the loop level to be adjusted so that is another option.

The pedal manufacturers would anser don't use the amps gain channel buy one of our unbelievably amazing distort pedals and use that on your board.

Doadman

  • Guest
Re: Pedal problem
« Reply #20 on: May 16, 2009, 08:11:36 AM »
I feel a lot more positive about my pedal board now that's for sure as I seem to have at least four possible solutions available to me that are all reasonable.

It would appear that putting all of the effects up front is no great hardship even on the drive channels as a number of experienced musicians have told me they do that with good results. I can only assume that any difference between up front and in the loop is marginal.

As far as the Digitech pedals working in the loop are concerned, I'd better clarify exactly what Digitech said. They were only talking about the Hardwire pedals but they did say that they would work OK; their only concern was that when using a conventional pedal like theirs in a parrallel effects loop, there would always be some dry signal making it through as well as the wet and this would compromise the result. Once again, based what a few people have said to me regarding their Digitech pedals in a DSL401 loop, the problem must again be marginal as they certainly haven't noticed it.

I could also choose to invest in better quality effects as I believe that the TC Electronics Nova Series pedals should work OK on -10db. Expensive certainly but nevertheless, a viable solution.

Finally I could add something into the effects loop to change the power flow into the pedals. I was never too keen on the Ceriatone Kleinulator as a solution because I couldn't find it in this country, didn't fancy the hassle of sending to America for it and then there was the noise issue. However, I have found an alternative in the Ebtech Line Level Shifter that I can buy here in the UK that should work so I have emailed the company for clarification. Here's a link to the details:

http://www.ebtechaudio.com/llsheinf.pdf

The advantage of this one seems to be that it has a hum eliminator built into it.

All in all, a good number of options that will allow me to keep both the homemade pedalboard I put so much effort into building and the amp that, other than the awkward effects loop, I love.

Alex

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2004
Re: Pedal problem
« Reply #21 on: May 16, 2009, 11:19:04 PM »
The effect loop should buffer the signal so ANY pedal should work in the effect loop. In case of the EHX - I had that clone pedal as well. It sounds really warm, but the bypass on that pedal is just incredibly bad IMO. I got rid of it in the end.
Current BKPs: Miracle Man, Nailbomb, Juggernaut, VHII
Past BKPS: Holy Diver, Trilogy Suite, Sinner, Black Dog

Bradock PI

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 336
Re: Pedal problem
« Reply #22 on: May 17, 2009, 12:09:54 AM »
I think PMT manchester have some TC electronics on a clearance table of pedals if you are anywhere near there, sorry I can't remember which ones.

hamfist

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1341
Re: Pedal problem
« Reply #23 on: May 17, 2009, 08:01:57 AM »
The effect loop should buffer the signal so ANY pedal should work in the effect loop.

FX loops can differ enormously in their circuit construction and capabilities. There is no such thing as a "standard" FX loop which behaves in a predictable way, in my experience.

AndyR

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4715
  • Where's all the top end gone?
    • My Offerings
Re: Pedal problem
« Reply #24 on: May 17, 2009, 10:24:55 AM »
I've never had an amp with an effects loop. When I was gigging I used to stick a delay/modulation pedal in front of my single channel valve amp that was kicking out my main tone. There was a boost in front of everything for solos, but at that time it was just a little graphic eq pedal, no dirt, that was coming from the preamp.

I used the pedal's delay for:
- crochet or minim delays for solos that needed it (we were a three-piece)
I used the pedal's modulation for:
- ripply chorus on on "clean parts", obtained by turning down the guitar's volume
- thickening up crunch rhythm parts when I wanted it

There's nothing drastically wrong with sticking delay/mod in front of a preamp - depending on what you want it to do... it's all personal taste - what does it sound like? What job does it do for you?

Nowadays, using modellors and having access to "after the event" processing in my recording kit I have choices.

For me personally, at the moment, these are my own "rules of thumb" (all designed to be broken if necessary):

- short slap-back echo, has to be applied after the amp (preferably "speakers" and all - I'm modelling remember), that's where it sounds best to me, just muddies things up without adding to the party if I stick it in front of the preamp.

- long (crochet or more) echo, doesn't make much difference either way once it's in the mix, I do tend to prefer reverb after delay, we perceive that as "more natural sounding", but adding echoes to an already reverbed signal can be useful when you want to be unnatural (or if you need the echo in the mix but don't have a dry signal to work with anymore :roll:)

- ripply chorus sounds (I don't use them much anymore anyway, I lived through the "chorused strat" 80s :lol:) these really only sound effective for me with "cleaner" tones and with careful use of reverb after... and the part really must end up stereo to really get much benefit at all - otherwise it's mud in the mix that isn't really adding value for me. Obviously this has to go after the "amp" for it to be possible.

- chorus/phase/flange to fatten up a guitar tone (not a guitar part) for me personally  still has to go in front of the amp, it just sounds like a studio effect otherwise... You've got to be real delicate with the amount/degree of effect otherwise an "over-complicated" signal into the amp's preamp will muddy up pretty damn quick - but sometimes that's what you want anyway :D

Those are my tastes at the moment... someone else's will be entirely different.

I'd say ask yourself what you want these effects to do for you? What do they sound like at the moment in front of the amp? If you go for a multi-effects unit in the FX loop - your "pedal effects" will no longer mess with your preamp - they won't do it in a bad way, but they won't do it in a good way either - you might end up with a more "sterile" sound. But if that's what your ears want, then it's a good thing :D

If an effect gives you something you like, that's great. You don't have to use effects the way everyone else does - you'll just find yourself sounding like everyone else. And as long as you don't start messing up the electricity in a dangerous way - you do not have to use a unit in exactly the way they designed it. Stick fuzz on the vocals, chorus on the drums, it all works!

Look at effects as creative tools where you can't break them - you can put screws in with a hammer if you like the effect it has and can use it :lol:

I hope that helps some. Good luck with sorting it out, you will get there :D
« Last Edit: May 17, 2009, 10:27:19 AM by AndyR »
Play or Download AndyR Music at http://www.alonetone.com/andyr

hamfist

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1341
Re: Pedal problem
« Reply #25 on: May 17, 2009, 04:56:10 PM »

There's nothing drastically wrong with sticking delay/mod in front of a preamp - depending on what you want it to do... it's all personal taste - what does it sound like? What job does it do for you?


I agree that it is down to personal taste.

However, you'll probably find that well over 90% of professional recordings in the last 30 years which have used delay on an overdriven/distorted guitar track, use the delay AFTER the distortion. Simply because to "most" people's tastes, it sounds nicer, and more musical.
  Professional producers do it like that because "people" like it better.