Username: Password:

Author Topic: Fuzz Vs Distortion/OD  (Read 2620 times)

mikey5

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 426
Fuzz Vs Distortion/OD
« on: September 16, 2009, 05:37:16 PM »
I heard this clip here from this Fuzz Pedal <which I think sounds very nice btw> and I was wondering what is the difference between a Fuzz pedal and a Distortion

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Af738CDwLeg

I think it sounds like an angry amp. I like that sound.

tomjackson

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
Re: Fuzz Vs Distortion/OD
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2009, 09:45:26 PM »
It's a fine line but to me:-

Overdrive - soft clipping, natural sounding gain increase giving a bigger sound that is smooth and sustaining.  original tone shines through but enhanced by the clipping and increased sustain.

Distortion - Harder sounding clipping, tight but sustaining, less transparent than overdrive, but still retaines some of the original tone.  Harmonics increase.

Fuzz - square wave clipping, fat sounding, loss of transparency and dynamics but masses of thick crunchy fun.  Turns your guitar into something else.

They are all very pleasing in their own way and overlap in a big crunchy Venn Diagram :D

dave_mc

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 9796
Re: Fuzz Vs Distortion/OD
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2009, 09:54:23 PM »
pretty much. fuzz is completely different, if you ask me, i'd only really use fuzz for very specific tones (but for those type of tones, they're virtually impossible to get without a fuzz).

camf

  • Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 55
Re: Fuzz Vs Distortion/OD
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2009, 10:30:17 PM »
Dinosaur Jr for fuzz masterclass. Fuzz from a pedal, Distortion/OD from the amp works best for me.

Spiteface

  • Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Re: Fuzz Vs Distortion/OD
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2009, 04:03:28 PM »
Seconded on the Dinosaur Jr, one of the reasons I prefer Fuzz, another being the Smashing Pumpkins' second album, Siamese Dream.

It's because of that I own more than one Big Muff (and the fact I've managed to break a couple over the years), trying to get close to the sound Billy Corgan got back then.  Then I stumbled across youtube demos of Pedals by Devi Ever,  Such as the Rocket.  That thing does a fuzz close to the Big Muff kinda stuff and more lo-fi/scrambled tones.  Tremendous stuff if you want some really "out there" fuzz.  Expensive, but you tend to pay more for hand made "boutique" stuff.

I think I like the Devi Ever stuff because, unlike other boutique pedals and such, these aren't "nice" sounds.  I find a lot of boutique fuzz pedals (especially Big Muff Clones and the like) are a bit too refined and almost made to sound more "tasteful", and thus take some of the character out of it.
Proud owner of a set of Riff Raffs and Emeralds.

HTH AMPS

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5649
    • HTH AMPS
Re: Fuzz Vs Distortion/OD
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2009, 05:53:58 PM »
Seconded on the Dinosaur Jr, one of the reasons I prefer Fuzz, another being the Smashing Pumpkins' second album, Siamese Dream.

It's because of that I own more than one Big Muff (and the fact I've managed to break a couple over the years), trying to get close to the sound Billy Corgan got back then.  Then I stumbled across youtube demos of Pedals by Devi Ever,  Such as the Rocket.  That thing does a fuzz close to the Big Muff kinda stuff and more lo-fi/scrambled tones.  Tremendous stuff if you want some really "out there" fuzz.  Expensive, but you tend to pay more for hand made "boutique" stuff.

I think I like the Devi Ever stuff because, unlike other boutique pedals and such, these aren't "nice" sounds.  I find a lot of boutique fuzz pedals (especially Big Muff Clones and the like) are a bit too refined and almost made to sound more "tasteful", and thus take some of the character out of it.

wow, someone that WANTS a more 'out there' Big Muff.  I'd say you're in the minority there mate, but if thats what floats yer boat, great.  looking at the schematic of a Big Muff, you'll see that its almost modular by design - they're just taken the same gain stage and put three (if memory serves me right) in series for mondo-fuzz.  If you wanted to go even more insane, you could build one with four or even five gain stages, though I'm not sure how useful that would be in practice.

shobet

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1582
  • Look into my eye...
    • http://www.dusksky.com
Re: Fuzz Vs Distortion/OD
« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2009, 07:25:53 PM »
Mark at Skreddy does some fantastic fuzzes. Pricey but worth it I've found. http://www.skreddypedals.com/
There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary.
Those who do and those who do not.

Spiteface

  • Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Re: Fuzz Vs Distortion/OD
« Reply #7 on: October 06, 2009, 02:15:03 PM »
Seconded on the Dinosaur Jr, one of the reasons I prefer Fuzz, another being the Smashing Pumpkins' second album, Siamese Dream.

It's because of that I own more than one Big Muff (and the fact I've managed to break a couple over the years), trying to get close to the sound Billy Corgan got back then.  Then I stumbled across youtube demos of Pedals by Devi Ever,  Such as the Rocket.  That thing does a fuzz close to the Big Muff kinda stuff and more lo-fi/scrambled tones.  Tremendous stuff if you want some really "out there" fuzz.  Expensive, but you tend to pay more for hand made "boutique" stuff.

I think I like the Devi Ever stuff because, unlike other boutique pedals and such, these aren't "nice" sounds.  I find a lot of boutique fuzz pedals (especially Big Muff Clones and the like) are a bit too refined and almost made to sound more "tasteful", and thus take some of the character out of it.

wow, someone that WANTS a more 'out there' Big Muff.  I'd say you're in the minority there mate, but if thats what floats yer boat, great.  looking at the schematic of a Big Muff, you'll see that its almost modular by design - they're just taken the same gain stage and put three (if memory serves me right) in series for mondo-fuzz.  If you wanted to go even more insane, you could build one with four or even five gain stages, though I'm not sure how useful that would be in practice.

Haha, in truth, I find most of the higher settings on the Rocket less usable, probably good for soloing.  The lower gain settings (which aren't particularly "low gain" it has to be said), make for great rhythm fuzz tones (good Siamese Dream style tones), and some cool ocatve stuff with the 2nd fuzz engaged (again, not really for chords, great for leads though).

Here's probably the most out there pedal Devi Ever's made: The Truly Beautiful Disaster:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnZ_pvI6590

Been discontinued a while, but there are a few more being made.  Expensive though, and not many song applications, I imagine.  Not for your more "trad" music styles, anyway.

I believe your right about the Big Muff circuit - 3 gain stages, been like that since the first "triangle" version, apart from the version 4 "Op Amp" version.
Proud owner of a set of Riff Raffs and Emeralds.

jibidy

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 595
Re: Fuzz Vs Distortion/OD
« Reply #8 on: October 08, 2009, 12:15:00 PM »
Fuzz= no chugg but huge gain

distortion and overdrive= chugg lots of gain and less gain respectively