Username: Password:

Author Topic: Nailbomb muddy?  (Read 10715 times)

kartar

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: Nailbomb muddy?
« Reply #15 on: January 02, 2010, 08:26:21 AM »
I can definitely get a decent high gain tone from them, but It depends what you're after.
It's top-seller pickup, so obviously many people has found good tone from them, which is good thing!  :D

Nailbomb (A5) is for sure good "harder rock and metal all-rounder", because it has balanced eq-curve, great definition and enought output for most of stuff.

My problem with NB was that I didn't get tight enought sound out of it even with tubescreamer or eq-pedal (used as mid- and level-booster) and it was lacking compression to my taste too. Muddiness wasn't problem.


Whats your amp? did you tried the ceramic nailbomb?

My amps are modified Marshalls JCM800 and plexi heads. NB, I tried in KV-2, was A5-version. I had C-bomb in mahogany bodied Dinky and it was amazing. I sold that guitar and I have missed that pickup. To my ears it is real metal pick up: tight, evil, pretty much compression - quite lot difference to A5-bomb... maybe something like darker and hotter CS, something like Painkiller too, like somebody has described it. I chooce Painkiller to that KV-2, because I like PKs insane midrange punch so much.  

 
SL2H with HDs, Custom super-strat with VHIIs, Yngwie-strat with Sinners and KV-2 with PK/CS set

Zaned

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 497
Re: Nailbomb muddy?
« Reply #16 on: January 02, 2010, 09:30:20 AM »
Another post for defending the Nailbomb. Not a post against Kartar though; if it's not the right pickup for that guitar, then it isn't.

I've had first hand experience with the NB in two strats; one has an all-maple neck, and an alder body, the second has a maple-topped alder body and a rosewood/maple neck. The latter one is my own.

My guitar has less midrange (maple top has that effect on alder) and is brighter. The NB is not dark at all in that guitar. The guitar has a tight tone, so the full bottom of the NB stays very tight too, and the top end is articulate and biting. The other strat has more midrange and the tone is darker, less cut in the highs. Not muddy though, it's a raunchy hard rock sound; very much like Doug Aldrich's tone on the DIO dvd Evil or Divine, which was the tone reference.

I too find it a versatile pickup, in the right guitar of course. In a bottom-heavy and dark topped guitar it won't work, unless you're after that sort of tone. I'm not.

-Zaned
Paths are for followers.

dheim

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1945
  • DON'TPANIC!
Re: Nailbomb muddy?
« Reply #17 on: January 02, 2010, 11:06:31 AM »
simply NBs don't match with your guitar. sometimes it happens... i had a set of Holy Divers (that are said to kick major ass in alder guitars, by the way) in a mahogany guitar tha wasn't too bassy acoustically... what i got from them was just buzzing and muddy sounds. setting the height helped a bit but didn't solve it. now HDs work wonderfully in anothe rguitar and the other one rocks with Rebel Yells.
sometimes it happens.
Mule, MQ, Stockholm, CS, RY, MM, PK, ANB, CNB, AWP, CWP, PiG90...

too many? ;)

FELINEGUITARS

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6609
  • London & Southeast's Number 1 BKP stockist
    • http://www.felineguitars.com
Re: Nailbomb muddy?
« Reply #18 on: January 02, 2010, 01:18:26 PM »
I'm quite surprised that the Nailbomb is the top selling BKP - I'd have put money on the Mule then the Warpig.



I must try the Ceramic Nailbomb and try it up against a Cold Sweat, Painkiller and a Miracle Man to see how it compares to the other ceramic magnet options.

I have really liked the A5 Nailbomb in some guitars but have always opted for something with more treble for my own personal axes.

I think one of the things that shaped my opinion was hearing Steve Stevens playing live with Billy Idol 4 years ago and commenting later that a certain guitar (white LP as I recall) didn't have the same cut as other ones he used in the set. I found out that the white one had a Nailbomb set and the others had the newly developed Rebel Yell .
www.felineguitars.com - repairs & custom built
Great fretwork!
Buy your BKPs & Earvana from ME!

JMP2203

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 34
Re: Nailbomb muddy?
« Reply #19 on: January 02, 2010, 02:57:30 PM »

My amps are modified Marshalls JCM800 and plexi heads. NB, I tried in KV-2, was A5-version. I had C-bomb in mahogany bodied Dinky and it was amazing. I sold that guitar and I have missed that pickup. To my ears it is real metal pick up: tight, evil, pretty much compression - quite lot difference to A5-bomb... maybe something like darker and hotter CS, something like Painkiller too, like somebody has described it. I chooce Painkiller to that KV-2, because I like PKs insane midrange punch so much.  

 

cool, do you think the painkiller is more compressed than c-bomb?

kartar

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: Nailbomb muddy?
« Reply #20 on: January 02, 2010, 04:38:04 PM »

My amps are modified Marshalls JCM800 and plexi heads. NB, I tried in KV-2, was A5-version. I had C-bomb in mahogany bodied Dinky and it was amazing. I sold that guitar and I have missed that pickup. To my ears it is real metal pick up: tight, evil, pretty much compression - quite lot difference to A5-bomb... maybe something like darker and hotter CS, something like Painkiller too, like somebody has described it. I chooce Painkiller to that KV-2, because I like PKs insane midrange punch so much.  

 

cool, do you think the painkiller is more compressed than c-bomb?

Maybe main difference is amount of mid. C-bomb has quite a lot of mids but PK huge amount of them.

I think that HD is best "all-rounder" for heavy stuff - I have had many of them in alder-Jacksons and basswood-Ibanezs always with great results, but in my mahogany bodied dark sounding Dinky it was too dark, even muddy. Sometimes it happens...

Next week I'm going to order new pickup to my strat (alder, rosewood, OFH, 1 hum) and maybe it's going to be Rebel Yell in some nice '80-styled colouring (black/yellow-zebra maybe). It has great midrange cut and lot of presence, something like PKs "alnico little brother"...

SL2H with HDs, Custom super-strat with VHIIs, Yngwie-strat with Sinners and KV-2 with PK/CS set

pagan7

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 184
Re: Nailbomb muddy?
« Reply #21 on: January 02, 2010, 11:36:29 PM »



[/quote]

I must try the Ceramic Nailbomb and try it up against a Cold Sweat, Painkiller and a Miracle Man to see how it compares to the other ceramic magnet options.

I have really liked the A5 Nailbomb in some guitars but have always opted for something with more treble for my own personal axes.

 
[/quote]

I recently took a set of A5 Nailbombs out of an Ibanez RGT (mahogany through neck and body, locking nut and floyd) because they over emphasised the natural middyness of that guitar too much for my liking - and fitted a set of C Bombs and they are superb - can only describe the core tone in mahogany as somewhere between A5 Bombs and Painkillers....or like a more organic and breathy Painkiller.
(when I ordered them Tim said that with a calibrated set of C Bombs he usually puts an alnico magnet in the neck pup, but I asked for ceramic magnets all round so he fitted both pups with the same ceramic magnets he uses in Painkillers - I also asked for nickel allen bolt pole screws instead of the soft iron slot head types)
I put the A5 Nailbombs in another RG, this one with a basswood body and bolt on unbound all maple neck/board, with the pups mounted on the pickguard as per a Strat, and the true depth and versatilty of the Nailbombs  really shines through now - far from being a one trick pony they can handle anything from folk rock through jazz rock right up to drop tuned industrial thrash and shredding with aplomb - just remember why your guitar has tone and volume controls  :P
CERAMIC NAILBOMBS + Ibanez RGT42DX and PAINKILLERS + Ibanez RG321MH and A5 NAILBOMBS + Ibanez RG1550

ericsabbath

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4702
    • Colidium
Re: Nailbomb muddy?
« Reply #22 on: January 03, 2010, 09:11:55 AM »
I sold my nailbombs cause they were way too articulated and tight sounding
they sounded quite bright and focused in my '73 LP custom
not muddy at all
maybe I was actually looking for something "muddier"  :lol:
Riff Raff, Mules, Black Dog, VHII's, Cold Sweat

Dr. Vic

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 526
Re: Nailbomb muddy?
« Reply #23 on: January 03, 2010, 11:10:41 AM »
This Topic is really an interesting one !

I had a similar-ish question I put in one topic some time ago : The NB I tried didn't worked for me as well. It was too dark, too smooth, and not the "huge agressive assault" I was expecting from its description.
The RY, still alnico V, has to me far more presence and bite when I tried it in an SG type guitar. It was also tighter than the NB.

So I'd say now that the NB doesn't work in every guitar and doesn't match all tastes but on the other side it has that ability of being versatile while covering lots of music styles, from metal to blues, whereas the Crawler does it from blues to "metal" while being equally at ease in a strat or an LP, as it's description says...

That said, if your were looking for a passive humbucker to replace the EMG81 of your RR24, and expecting same kind of tightness and agressivity, you must - at least  - stay with a Ceramic magnet. I think that ANY alnico V magnet will be too warm and loose for you.

There an exchange policy at BKP, see with Tim with you still can benefit from it and go with what he and the other here said before : The painkiller !  :twisted:

Also ask Antag about his clips of the PK in his KV2 and also ask Gwem about his choice to replace the EMG81 of his RR24.

Note that the Miracle Man would also be one stunning option for the RR24, maybe less agressive and present than the PK, but with *maybe* more balls and thickness on the chuggy-palm-mute-works ! 

Good luck !   :!
 


 
   

ACHIEVE PERFECTION

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Nailbomb muddy?
« Reply #24 on: January 03, 2010, 10:42:14 PM »
Another post of defense for the nailbomb. I recently replaced a jb with the nailbomb in the bridge of my jackson dk2s (alder body, maple neck, rosewood) and it is fantastic. It is not as middy as the jb (which is good as the jb was too middy), it has great low end, it cleans up amazing and the lead tones are fantastic. I would never say the nb is muddy. On the other hand i have never played that guitar through a mk iii. But on every other tube amp i have played (about 9), it sounds exceptional.

Dreded

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: Nailbomb muddy?
« Reply #25 on: January 07, 2010, 01:41:34 AM »
Perhaps the solder joints are at fault. A good quality joint will definitely help. Also, the pots may a tad dark for your setup. Perhaps a 750k or a 1000k? Seeing as you've swapped all the active compatible electronics for some passive ones, maybe there's a slight muckup with the solder job? Could happen.  :)

_tom_

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 8842
Re: Nailbomb muddy?
« Reply #26 on: January 07, 2010, 11:46:04 AM »
Is the OP Spiritcrusher from HC/maplifiers? If so, your tone wasn't muddy in the clips you posted!

MDV

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
  • If it sounds good it IS good
Re: Nailbomb muddy?
« Reply #27 on: January 07, 2010, 03:05:13 PM »

My amps are modified Marshalls JCM800 and plexi heads. NB, I tried in KV-2, was A5-version. I had C-bomb in mahogany bodied Dinky and it was amazing. I sold that guitar and I have missed that pickup. To my ears it is real metal pick up: tight, evil, pretty much compression - quite lot difference to A5-bomb... maybe something like darker and hotter CS, something like Painkiller too, like somebody has described it. I chooce Painkiller to that KV-2, because I like PKs insane midrange punch so much. 

 

cool, do you think the painkiller is more compressed than c-bomb?

No. The c-bomb is the more compressed pickup.

Niether are very compressed though.