Username: Password:

Author Topic: NAD  (Read 2266 times)

choucas09

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 672
NAD
« on: January 20, 2010, 10:03:00 PM »
Bogner Alchemist 1x12. £609 delivered from Soundslive.


Lew

  • Guest
Re: NAD
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2010, 10:14:47 PM »
Sweeet. Nice VHT guitar too  :-p
« Last Edit: January 21, 2010, 12:45:20 AM by Lew!! »

Ted 'N' Leo

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 670
Re: NAD
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2010, 10:59:11 PM »
I've heard good things about those Bogners! Nice one!

And awesome guitar!
Driving in my car, smoking my cigar, the only time i'm happys when i'm playing my guitar!

Johnny Mac

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5841
    • Ultimate Guitar Profile
Re: NAD
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2010, 10:59:46 PM »
Nice looking combo and guitar  8)
Warpig, MQ,
Miracle Man-Trilogy Suite, Cold Sweats, Black Guards, Rebel Yells & Irish Tours!

FernandoDuarte

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3978
Re: NAD
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2010, 11:17:51 PM »
Cool!

Andrew W

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1350
    • http://www.andrew-whitehurst.net
Re: NAD
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2010, 11:31:41 PM »
I am jealous of both the new amp and the guitar.  Very nice.

choucas09

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 672
Re: NAD
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2010, 01:34:13 AM »
The guitar cost £150 new. I'm planning a major overhaul when I sell my Taylor. Everything will be changed except the body.

38thBeatle

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6098
    • http://www.myspace.com/alteregoukband
Re: NAD
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2010, 06:18:31 AM »
Looks good to me.
Send three and fourpence we're going to a dance
BKP's: Apache, Country Boy, Slowhands.

exoslime

  • Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 59
Re: NAD
« Reply #8 on: January 21, 2010, 02:50:43 PM »
cool

Dr. Stein

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 239
Re: NAD
« Reply #9 on: January 21, 2010, 02:55:24 PM »
Personally, I hate the guitar, but congrats on the amp.

Denim n Leather

  • Guest
Re: NAD
« Reply #10 on: January 21, 2010, 03:05:22 PM »
Very nice amp, and very nice Linn Majik/Classik, too (can't tell in that photo).

choucas09

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 672
Re: NAD
« Reply #11 on: January 21, 2010, 03:49:54 PM »
Well spotted D&L it's the Classik.

I knew the guitar would excite a bit of interest. Acrylic is a surprisingly good tone "wood". Well worth hunting out for an unusual guitar project. Bloody heavy though, that thing weighs 12 pounds.

As for the amp I'm not sure I'm going to keep it (7 days approval). It's a pretty awesome amp, but it's too dark for my playing especially on the gain channel. However last night my nephew came round and played it for 3 hours and was absolutely blown away with it and is seriously considering getting one. He's got a handwired Marshall and a 74 Fender Twin been in loads of bands and lectures in electric guitar playing so his opinion carries some weight. I'll give it a couple of days then make my decision. Thanks for the comments. If I keep it I'll post some clips.

Herbie the Rad Dorklift

  • Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 71
    • Band
Re: NAD
« Reply #12 on: January 21, 2010, 04:07:12 PM »
Let us know how you get on, I personally think they're a blight on the Bogner name...

hunter

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5262
    • http://www.myspace.com/christophjaeger
Re: NAD
« Reply #13 on: January 21, 2010, 04:26:17 PM »
Looks sweet, gotta love Reinhold's amps, congrats!

Soundslive have some amazing deals these days, I also just bought an amp off them, a real steal!
Tweaker's Paradise - Player's nightmare.

Herbie the Rad Dorklift

  • Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 71
    • Band
Re: NAD
« Reply #14 on: January 21, 2010, 04:27:53 PM »
The clean channels are supposed to be nice, but I heard the drive channel was very thin and uninspiring... maybe it's because the bloke who reviewed it had an XTC 101b too :D