Username: Password:

Author Topic: Les Paul Traditional?  (Read 2143 times)

Ian Price

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4571
Re: Les Paul Traditional?
« Reply #15 on: March 29, 2010, 12:07:19 PM »
Ah, I may be a non-laddish, two-pints-and-fall-asleep-in-a-corner little geek.... but I do know quite a bit about football.  :P

Mostly in a facts-and-figures kind of way, I must admit.  I follow the results, the transfers, the manager sackings.  I don't actually go to football matches, and I can't really see the tactical "shape" of a game when I watch it.  But I've spent 20+ years working with football fanatics and it's slowly rubbed off on me.

Fair noeugh. I do hope that you don't slowly rub off on them though  :?
I think I hate being indecisive.

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: Les Paul Traditional?
« Reply #16 on: March 29, 2010, 12:36:56 PM »
Ah, I may be a non-laddish, two-pints-and-fall-asleep-in-a-corner little geek.... but I do know quite a bit about football.  :P

Mostly in a facts-and-figures kind of way, I must admit.  I follow the results, the transfers, the manager sackings.  I don't actually go to football matches, and I can't really see the tactical "shape" of a game when I watch it.  But I've spent 20+ years working with football fanatics and it's slowly rubbed off on me.

Fair noeugh. I do hope that you don't slowly rub off on them though  :?

No, it's an open-plan office.
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM