grrr, the quote thingy isn't working.
"That's about as roundabout an answer as you could have given. Do you mean that you're not well educated enough to do the job? Or that the public (ie, us) only vote for rich kids who went to Eaton?"
no, he means that in order to actually get put up for a seat (certainly for the tories, and it's probably not great for the other parties either) you have to have been from eton, or be from a political family. An odd one gets through with a more "normal" background, but generally you have to pretty much turn into a yah to get anywhere if that's the case. If I don't like the principle behind yahs, I'm not going to go fawning round them to get a few crumbs.
"a) Does anybody with half a brain? Fair reason though.
b) Why?
c) Nobody would get voted in if they said what they thought. The inherent problem with a democratic system is that everyone gets to vote on who they want to lead them.
d) Then why not be an independent candidate?
(e) Point is, if you're not interested in trying to make a positive difference yourself, it sounds a bit rich sitting at home and slagging off everyone else's attempts. There's nothing necessarily wrong with not trying, but surely that should give you a degree of respect for those who do?"
(a) :)
(b) cos i'm not, er, evil, and have no desire to be?
(c) yeah, but I'm not willing to lie or compromise on my principles to get in. that makes it pretty hard to compete with people who are.
(d) I don't want to be a politician, and independents generally get nowhere.
(e) are they trying to make a positive difference? cos if they are, I'm not seeing it. And it's extremely dangerous once you're willing to compromise on your ideals to get in, because once you're in then you can do what you want, so you justify it. I'm not a fan of the end justifying the means.