Will any of the bk tele pu's at least be as bright and sharp as the fender tele pu's. If they can be as trebly as the stock pu's in teles like the nocaster, 52 reissue, american standard tele, and mexican standard tele then that is good enough for me. I am definitely looking for a classic tele sound, but if none of the bk tele pu's are as bright and metallic as the fender tele pu's then IMO they are not authentic sounding tele pickups and are not capturing the true essence of a telecaster and rather they are going for their own sound, which is not a bad thing, but not what I'm looking for. I think that metallic sound in the bridge is as important to capturing the true tele sound as is that piercing treble. One of you said the BG's won't be as icepicky as the real tele pu's. I'm still not 100% sure what icepicky means, but if means what I think it does then I think the bk tele pu's should have because otherwise they really missed the mark in making vintage tele pu's, unless of course I have the wrong definition of icepicky. I don't mean to sound like I'm saying negative things about bk tele pu's because I have no idea since I have never played and even if they don't have that signature tele sound they still may be amazing pickups in their own way, so don't get the wrong idea. Thanks for the help. Also I don't think I need a treble because all the fender tele pickups I played had enough, only the non-fender boutique pickups I played lacked the treble, but they still were better quality pick ups and to me sounded much better, but just did not sound like a traditional tele to me.