What I really meant was:
Does the wood of the centerpiece matters most, less, or just as much as the wings' wood? :)
Thanks for the replies so far.
About the MM: I thought it lacked crunch mostly.
.
Hi!
IMO it depends on the guitar.
I used a Jackson Kelly Custom Shop years back (explorer type body).
This guitar had a maple neck-through with mahogany wings.
The tone was HUGE, and I really heard more of the warmt from the mahogany than the snap and brittle tone from the maple.
This combination was just killer. I regret selling this guitar, it had tone in spades.
Compared to a long gone Jackson Custom Shop Soloist, same body woods, the Soloist sounded brighter and lacked the fullness of the Kelly. It was "small" by comparison.
These days I still have two Jacksons that sees much action (with my LP's).
These are a Rhoads "Original" PCS-USA and a King V Korina USA.
The Rhoads have a maple center and poplar wings. Again the more mass of the vings makes the maple center-block "melt" into the sound of the vings. Hehehehe, sounds of the wings, a good one. No thin, or britlle tones here (no Floyd either).
The Korina V is another story, this guitar is the best sounding Jackson I've ever used. It's just a monster.
I think an all mahogany (Korina is often called African mahogany) with more body mass makes better tone, compared to a maple center.
Even that the wood of the center neck-through is a minor issue with these type of guitars.
Btw, IMO a well built neck-through guitar do have better sustain compared to the best bolt-on You'll get.
The stings have better transf. through the body and neck of a neck-through, You get better sustain as the strings are in direct contact with the neck on the "body" as well.
What tone You prefer, is another issue. Many prefer the attach and punch of a bolt on neck guitar. The neck-through seems to be more smooth and even in a way.
:)
T.
www.trendkillerweb.com