Username: Password:

Author Topic: Ooh, the new PRS Private Stock "Signature" guitars are hitting the shelves!  (Read 37053 times)

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
I'm not saying PRS are overpriced everywhere. I'm saying they're overpriced in the UK.

Based on what exactly, Dave?  Neither you (nor nfe) have given any evidence to support this opinion.

dave_mc

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 9796
well nfe said that you could buy one retail in the US for less than a shop here could buy one wholesale...

I just mean compared to the prices they go for in the USA (and obviously factoring in stuff like VAT etc.). As far as I'm concerned, any product is (probably) going to be cheapest in the country in which it's produced. All those other things like postage, needing to set up distributor networks etc. cost money, but they don't really add any value for the customer.

That's all I mean- nothing more complicated than that. If a PRS costs the equivalent of £1500 in the US and costs £2500 here, then by my (layman's) definition, that means it's overpriced, because VAT and postage should only bring that up to ~£1900 or so.

MF has a 25th anniversary custom 24 for $2800, and the same guitar (i think) on dv247 is £2500... a swamp ash special is $2300 and £2200..

Funnily enough the discontinued mira and starla xes were (still are) incredibly cheap on dv247... actually cheaper than in the USA, I think. I was very close to buying one except i didn't think it was the best choice for the tones i wanted... :lol:

obviously there are other factors at play too, like if only PRS makes guitars the way you like them, then you sorta have to pay it, and that's fair enough, I would agree wholeheartedly that in that case you should just get the PRS if you won't be happy unless you do. but if (like me) you're pretty easy as long as it's a good guitar, then normally the stuff built closer to home is better value.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2011, 06:28:51 PM by dave_mc »

AndyR

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4715
  • Where's all the top end gone?
    • My Offerings
i think that depends on your definition of "profit". I don't really count your wage/salary as profit- if you do, then that changes things a bit.

I was kind of thinking "profit" in that bit as "wage/salary" for the day minus "running costs" to keep the body alive for the next day. I was thinking of the running costs as including taxes because they are required of the individual, commuting costs to get you to work and back, essential food, housing costs, water bill, energy bill for light and heat, basic clothes and hygiene.

Anything else - phones, tv licence, alcohol, music, books, fancy cosmetics, energy bills for running any of them, and then the things I did mention, I was ruling out as luxuries not essential to keep the "business" of a human being afloat and ready for trading the next day. These have to come out of the profit.

Not a perfect image, obviously, but that was how I was thinking. Partly because it illustrated to me how "huge" a profit I make everyday, and I usually regard myself as scr@ping along and not taking too much advantage of anyone else! :lol:

And this was just classic:

Oh and is this a bad time to say that I should maybe check what prs prices actually are in the US? :lol:

:lol:

I'm not even that familiar with UK prices! I think this thread is probably going to turn into a classic example of Internet-Knowledge. A bunch of idiots arguing a bunch of stuff based on hearsay and assumptions made about what other people have said.

NOTE TO INNOCENT PASSERS-BY READING THIS THREAD IN 2016: Some of the participants on this thread have no idea what they are talking about, do not accept anything you read as established fact... :lol:

And I reckon Dave might have you this one:

I'm not saying PRS are overpriced everywhere. I'm saying they're overpriced in the UK.

Based on what exactly, Dave?  Neither you (nor nfe) have given any evidence to support this opinion.

:lol:

I'm sure you'll find something to offer him though :lol:

EDIT: Oh bum! You have already :lol: (I'll read it now...)

EDIT2: No, fail, that's not good enough he's closing in on you... mate in four moves I reckon :lol:
« Last Edit: May 27, 2011, 06:32:06 PM by AndyR »
Play or Download AndyR Music at http://www.alonetone.com/andyr

dave_mc

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 9796
(a) I was kind of thinking "profit" in that bit as "wage/salary" for the day minus "running costs" to keep the body alive for the next day. I was thinking of the running costs as including taxes because they are required of the individual, commuting costs to get you to work and back, essential food, housing costs, water bill, energy bill for light and heat, basic clothes and hygiene.

Anything else - phones, tv licence, alcohol, music, books, fancy cosmetics, energy bills for running any of them, and then the things I did mention, I was ruling out as luxuries not essential to keep the "business" of a human being afloat and ready for trading the next day. These have to come out of the profit.

Not a perfect image, obviously, but that was how I was thinking. Partly because it illustrated to me how "huge" a profit I make everyday, and I usually regard myself as scr@ping along and not taking too much advantage of anyone else! :lol:

(b) And this was just classic:

Oh and is this a bad time to say that I should maybe check what prs prices actually are in the US? :lol:

:lol:

(c) I'm not even that familiar with UK prices! I think this thread is probably going to turn into a classic example of Internet-Knowledge. A bunch of idiots arguing a bunch of stuff based on hearsay and assumptions made about what other people have said.

NOTE TO INNOCENT PASSERS-BY READING THIS THREAD IN 2016: Some of the participants on this thread have no idea what they are talking about, do not accept anything you read as established fact... :lol:

And I reckon Dave might have you this one:

I'm not saying PRS are overpriced everywhere. I'm saying they're overpriced in the UK.

Based on what exactly, Dave?  Neither you (nor nfe) have given any evidence to support this opinion.

:lol:

I'm sure you'll find something to offer him though :lol:

(c) EDIT: Oh bum! You have already :lol: (I'll read it now...)

(d) EDIT2: No, fail, that's not good enough he's closing in on you... mate in four moves I reckon :lol:

(a) ah, that's pretty much why we're arguing, then :lol: I consider profit to be the bit that the owners/shareholders/partners in the business take out once they've paid all the costs required to keep the business running. the dividend that shares would pay you.

I think we're basically on the same page, just using different terminology/definitions :) I'm certainly not saying for a second that once you've covered your food and board that you should get no more pay :lol:

(b) yeah i thought you guys might like that. :lol: Problem is I checked all these prices ages ago, but prices change. But I think they're still in the same ballpark as what I originally though, so crisis averted :lol: With a quick calculation, and taking VAT and a rough postage assumption of ~£100, you'd be saving around £400-£500 on those PRSes I posted.

(c) :lol:

(d)  :x

nfe

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2510
I'm not saying PRS are overpriced everywhere. I'm saying they're overpriced in the UK.

Based on what exactly, Dave?  Neither you (nor nfe) have given any evidence to support this opinion.

As Dave has mentioned, I think my first post in this thread is evidence. If a punter in the UK can buy a PRS cheaper by importing it from the US cheaper than a retailer can buy one from their distributer here (even if it's by pennies), then they're overpriced here (or, you might argue, underpriced in the US).

AndyR

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4715
  • Where's all the top end gone?
    • My Offerings
Sorry, I wasn't clear again Dave (mc) - I was treating a human being like a business. Money In - Costs = Profit.

What I'm saying is, our disposable income is our profit. A business is the same, the profit is their disposable income. We see no reason (or I don't anyway :lol:) in limiting the disposable income an individual can aspire to, so why should we limit the same for a company?

I still reckon Dave (TF) is closing in on you - we might be more verbose and rattle off from the heart etc... but he always seems to have a bit more air of authority in his arguments... I reckon he's gonna trump you on what I've seen so far :lol:

(Not prepared to put money on it though!)
Play or Download AndyR Music at http://www.alonetone.com/andyr

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Crikey, there are some long posts in this thread!  :lol: :lol:

It may hold the prodigious posts record.
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Neither nfe or dave_mc have convinced me yet  :lol:

OK, so the prices aren't identical in the US vs UK, but with currency fluctuations and the increased cost of getting guitars over here that's never going to be the case.  Within a few hundred quid is pretty close, and maybe technically "overpriced", but close enough and reasonable in my eyes.  Remember my margins comment from earlier too - US dealers sell more units for a smaller profit on each item.  The reverse is true here in the UK.

nfe and dave_mc seem to be implying PRS' are up to £1000 over the US price here, which clearly isn't the case.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2011, 07:07:22 PM by Twinfan »

dave_mc

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 9796
(to andy) I dunno... I mean how do you argue against, "anything is worth what its purchaser will pay"?

I mean that's sort of circular logic, lol. While I'd agree that there's definitely some subjectivity in there, I would say there's also an objective component too. Much like music or food taste- while there's no accounting for taste, it wouldn't be too hard to make a dish or song that no-one liked, lol.

Maybe I'm not as authoritative because dave's coming from the more extreme "they're worth it if people will pay it" argument whereas I'm coming from the more compromised, "I agree with that to a certain extent, but taken to extremes that's silly, I think there's also an objective component to prices". I'm not saying Dave's wrong because his opinion is from one extreme of the argument (as the correct answer can be anywhere along the continuum from one extreme to the other, inclusive), but that could give rise to my appearing less "authoritative".

I mean, by saying "stuff is worth what people will pay", that means house prices were correct just before the boom went bust. That can't be right, surely?

^ (dave) they may have been last time I checked- prices in the US have gone up a fair bit recently because of the weak dollar. But there was about ~£500 difference after I'd taken VAT and postage into account- which is a fair enough thing to do, I'd agree. Comparing the actual price you'd pay in the US versus the price here, it's close to £1k.

I would say the margins thing could go either way- while I'd agree they sell more in america, they'd sell more here if they were cheaper. I accept jpf's point that some people are buying them precisely because they're expensive as a status symbol, but I don't think there are anywhere near as many people doing that as people who are not buying them because they can't afford them. Apart from anything, if that were true, their next move should be to instantly raise prices in the USA :lol:

I would have no problem agreeing that the difference in prices between the US and the UK falls within the range of subjectivity as to whether they're over-priced or not, if you have no problem agreeing to that. :)

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
^ (dave) they may have been last time I checked- prices in the US have gone up a fair bit recently because of the weak dollar. But there was about ~£500 difference after I'd taken VAT and postage into account- which is a fair enough thing to do, I'd agree. Comparing the actual price you'd pay in the US versus the price here, it's close to £1k.

I still don't think you're seeing the point Dave.  They can't actually sell them huge amounts cheaper as prices here in the UK at dealers include our 20% VAT and 3.7% import duty, plus the transport costs and administration fees.  You can't compare that to a price in the US that only includes an 8% or less sales tax.

If you want to buy in the US and bring it into the country illegally (avoiding taxes) to save money then that's your choice, but you can't use that as an argument to say that PRS or Gibson guitars here in the UK are seriously overpriced.

AndyR

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4715
  • Where's all the top end gone?
    • My Offerings
I've just realised, one of the reasons I joined the discussion is that I strongly believe the following:

- It's the right of a seller to ask whatever price they like
- It's the right of the buyer to walk away

and I haven't actually said that that clearly anywhere!

After that, I very much believe that a thing is only actually worth what someone will pay for it.

For example, there was talk a while back of second-hand PRSs (coincidentally) taking a nose-dive. A seller can sit on his concept of a book-price, what they were going for last week, as much as he likes, but if he can't shift it for that, the thing just ain't worth that much at the moment - you cannot convert it to that much cash. It's only worth what you can get for it.

By the same argument, the house prices were correct until all the prospective buyers went sod-off it's too much, I'm waiting until you drop your prices and I can afford them. House prices have to come down when that happens.

Now, if Mr Smith can't sell the guitars he needs to at the price he's going for now - he will need to drop his prices as well (simplified I know - another option is put them up). The price before the change is correct, and so is the price after.

And this thread has done one thing for me - I'm now convinced that we're being slightly premature in expecting the price in one marketplace to be comparable to that in another marketplace. Just because we can see the prices that Mr US is charged on the internet doesn't mean we can expect the same prices for Mr UK. They are completely different markets that do not operate together at the moment. There are too many factors involved including average disposable income, taxes and duties, demand and fashionability of the item in the territory, etc, etc...

When it comes down to it though, it's still the supplier's perogative (in my mind anyway) to run his business as he sees fit. He's probably watching stuff like this going "Jeez guys, I'm doing my best to get the thing to you at what I believe to be a fair price, if you want it, buy it, if not, don't..."
Play or Download AndyR Music at http://www.alonetone.com/andyr

nfe

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2510
^ (dave) they may have been last time I checked- prices in the US have gone up a fair bit recently because of the weak dollar. But there was about ~£500 difference after I'd taken VAT and postage into account- which is a fair enough thing to do, I'd agree. Comparing the actual price you'd pay in the US versus the price here, it's close to £1k.

I still don't think you're seeing the point Dave.  They can't actually sell them huge amounts cheaper as prices here in the UK at dealers include our 20% VAT and 3.7% import duty, plus the transport costs and administration fees.  You can't compare that to a price in the US that only includes an 8% or less sales tax.

If you want to buy in the US and bring it into the country illegally (avoiding taxes) to save money then that's your choice, but you can't use that as an argument to say that PRS or Gibson guitars here in the UK are seriously overpriced.

But the point was that it's possible to import a guitar to the UK (legally, paying all taxes) cheaper than a DEALER in the UK can buy one. Dealers in the UK don't make much markup, but either the distributor has a huge one, or PRS charge significantly higher prices to overseas distributors.

Or at least that was the case as of around March 2008, I haven't paid a great deal of attention since.

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
But the point was that it's possible to import a guitar to the UK (legally, paying all taxes) cheaper than a DEALER in the UK can buy one. Dealers in the UK don't make much markup, but either the distributor has a huge one, or PRS charge significantly higher prices to overseas distributors.

Or at least that was the case as of around March 2008, I haven't paid a great deal of attention since.

Not true any more, I don't think.

I haven't spent hours on calculations, but yes, I do believe you can currently import (including all taxes etc) for somewhat less than the UK selling price.  Twinfan did some numbers way back in the mists of time at the start of this thread.  But that can't be less than the dealer price, unless their markup is as tight as a gnat's chuff.

But again, this isn't unique to PRS.  For years, any (US-made) guitar that costs $1,000 in the US has cost £1,000 in the UK (give or take).  And that seems to be pretty constant despite some huge fluctuations in exchange rates.

Does that mean guitars are "overpriced" in the UK?  Or is it just the way the market works, and has for a very long time?
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

dave_mc

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 9796
^ I'm not sure, philly. I don't know about guitars, but for amps, there definitely are some differences between the brands. A mesa recto goes for around $1500 in the US (last time I checked, anyway- it's probably gone up a bit now but i doubt it's any more than $2k, it's very hard to find mesa prices online in the US). The price in the UK is more like £2k. If you then look at, say, a Fryette, a sig x in the UK is ~£1650, while in the USA it's $2249 (~£1350). I would also point out (I could be wrong) that I would have strong suspicions that Mesa sells a lot more amps in the UK than Fryette does, so the whole "smaller market" thing arguably doesn't apply either. Unless, I guess, Fryette expects to sell so few amps in the UK that it doesn't even really have a distribution thing set up and if something does go wrong it has to be sent back to the US....

I still don't think you're seeing the point Dave.  They can't actually sell them huge amounts cheaper as prices here in the UK at dealers include our 20% VAT and 3.7% import duty, plus the transport costs and administration fees.  You can't compare that to a price in the US that only includes an 8% or less sales tax.

If you want to buy in the US and bring it into the country illegally (avoiding taxes) to save money then that's your choice, but you can't use that as an argument to say that PRS or Gibson guitars here in the UK are seriously overpriced.

I never said I wanted to bring them in illegally. I said after taking VAT and postage (here) etc. into account they were about £500 cheaper in the US. That's still a fair whack, though admittedly not the ~£1k that my original posts may have implied. I only made mention of the US price, without VAT/customs/postage charges, as an interesting aside.

After that, I very much believe that a thing is only actually worth what someone will pay for it.

For example, there was talk a while back of second-hand PRSs (coincidentally) taking a nose-dive. A seller can sit on his concept of a book-price, what they were going for last week, as much as he likes, but if he can't shift it for that, the thing just ain't worth that much at the moment - you cannot convert it to that much cash. It's only worth what you can get for it.

By the same argument, the house prices were correct until all the prospective buyers went sod-off it's too much, I'm waiting until you drop your prices and I can afford them. House prices have to come down when that happens.

Now, if Mr Smith can't sell the guitars he needs to at the price he's going for now - he will need to drop his prices as well (simplified I know - another option is put them up). The price before the change is correct, and so is the price after.

And this thread has done one thing for me - I'm now convinced that we're being slightly premature in expecting the price in one marketplace to be comparable to that in another marketplace. Just because we can see the prices that Mr US is charged on the internet doesn't mean we can expect the same prices for Mr UK. They are completely different markets that do not operate together at the moment. There are too many factors involved including average disposable income, taxes and duties, demand and fashionability of the item in the territory, etc, etc...

When it comes down to it though, it's still the supplier's perogative (in my mind anyway) to run his business as he sees fit. He's probably watching stuff like this going "Jeez guys, I'm doing my best to get the thing to you at what I believe to be a fair price, if you want it, buy it, if not, don't..."

Oh, I agree that something's only worth what someone will pay for it- if you're talking about something having value on paper. If I have a guitar and claim it's worth £2k but no-one will actually give me £2k, then I agree that it's not worth £2k :lol: By that I mean that the minimum value of something is set by what someone will pay- if I claim something is worth a certain price yet can't find a buyer willing to pay that price then it probably isn't worth that.

But that's a bit different from what we're talking about in this thread- where you *can* find a buyer willing to pay it (for whatever reason), but where you (personally) are not convinced it's worth the price (again, for whatever reason).

Now, granted, we could all just say, "If you think it's worth it, pay it, and if you don't, don't." (I actually don't have a gigantic problem with that statement, FWIW) But that's no fun :lol:

[FWIW I don't think the housing market collapsed because the consumers suddenly became rational and sensible- credit dried up overnight. :lol: If there were easy credit and 125% mortgages like there were in 2007 I could easily see the housing market going back to the bubble it was. :lol: Again, if anything, that backs up my point where I said that higher prices would lead to decreased demand if that increased price led to lots of people simply being unable to afford the product, regardless of how much they actually wanted to buy it.]

My point is when something is going for a different price in a different territory, and where, legally, if the manufacturer would allow it, I could import it paying all applicable taxes and retail shipping rates for much less than I can buy it in my own country, that, to me, means that that product is very expensive in my own country.

You mentioned different supply and demand and fashionability in different territories- that's a good point. As jpf touched on much earlier in this thread, to me the fashionability/demand is too much tied up in the retail price to be really considered as a separate item... as I mentioned earlier in this thread, on the more UK-centric forums I post on, mesas are considered boutique, whereas on the US-centred forums I post on, they're not. Pretty much only due to the price and (imagined?) value or (imagined?) lack of value inferred by the customer in that territory because of the price.

My big problem about saying "Prices are right because the market price can't be wrong" is that it doesn't really tell you anything useful. To me a scientific theory doesn't really mean much unless it's fasifiable.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2011, 09:26:19 PM by dave_mc »

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Now we're getting somewhere  :)

Using my example from before, the difference on a new PRS Studio is:

UK = £2749
US (minus Kentucky sales tax, where Wilcutts is based) = ((1935/1.06 + 75(?) shipping)*1.037)*1.2 = £2365

A £384 difference, but I don't think the sales tax can be deducted in Kentucky?  Therefore it's probably:

UK = £2749
US = (£1935+£75)*1.037*1.2 = £2501

£248 difference

There's no way a UK shop pays £2500 for the Studio, as only taking the VAT off makes it £2291.

So nfe can't be right.  And £248 isn't that big of a difference in my eyes given the decreased risk of transporting it across the pond, and the ability to actually try the guitar before buying, which counters Dave's "very expensive in my country" statement.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2011, 09:31:23 PM by Twinfan »